Hearing Re: Default Judgment.
Plaintiff filed an action against defendant asserting causes of action for motor vehicle negligence and loss of consortium. Defendant EAN Holdings, LLC was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on November 8, 2018. The complaint alleges that plaintiff sustained damages in an amount subject to proof. The proofs of service filed on December 19, 2018 declare that the summons, complaint, and a statement of damages were personally served on defendants Olson and Shoenfeld. Default was entered against defendants Olson and Shoenfeld on December 19, 2018.
Plaintiff Rhonda Hildebrand seeks entry of a default judgment against defendants in the following amounts for the following damages: past medical expenses - $4,756.65; loss of personal property - $24,000; loss of use - $4,500; pain and suffering - $35,000; and emotional distress - $15,000.
Plaintiff requests entry of judgment against defendants in the amount of $15,000 for loss of consortium.
The complaint alleg
Hearing Date
August 09, 2019
Type
AUTO TORT - UNLIMITED
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Hearing Re: Default Judgment.
Plaintiff filed an action against defendant asserting causes of action for motor vehicle negligence and loss of consortium. Defendant EAN Holdings, LLC was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on November 8, 2018. The complaint alleges that plaintiff sustained damages in an amount subject to proof. The proofs of service filed on December 19, 2018 declare that the summons, complaint, and a statement of damages were personally served on defendants Olson and Shoenfeld. Default was entered against defendants Olson and Shoenfeld on December 19, 2018.
Plaintiff Rhonda Hildebrand seeks entry of a default judgment against defendants in the following amounts for the following damages: past medical expenses - $4,756.65; loss of personal property - $24,000; loss of use - $4,500; pain and suffering - $35,000; and emotional distress - $15,000.
Plaintiff requests entry of judgment against defendants in the amount of $15,000 for loss of consortium.
The complaint alleg