HEARING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED BY GREYSTONE HOMES,

INC

* TENTATIVE RULING: *

The facts relevant to the motion for summary judgment, or, in the alternative, summary adjudication (“MSJ”) brought by defendant Greystone Homes, Inc. (“Greystone”) are not in dispute. Plaintiff Mohammed Danesh-Bahreini (“Danesh”) closed escrow on his home on May 31, 2006. (Greystone UMF No. 1.) In November 2008, Danesh hired a civil engineer to inspect the foundation at his home. (Greystone UMF No. 22.) The engineer prepared a report which was sent to Danesh on December 5, 2008, and which found, in summary, that there were problems with the foundation at Danesh’s home. (Greystone UMF No. 22; Ex. 9.) This action was filed on December 20, 2012, more than four years after Danesh received the engineer’s report identifying problems with the foundation at his home. The question presented by the MSJ is whether the action (or any of its causes of action) is time-barred. The remaining causes of action