HEARING DATE: October 13, 2020
CASE NUMBER: BC720198
CASE NAME: Jesus Mancilla v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., et al.
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Jesus Mancilla
RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., et al.
TRIAL DATE: None
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of Representative Action Settlement
OPPOSITION: None, Notice of Non-Opposition August 6, 2020
REPLY: No opposition filed.
TENTATIVE: The court wants to hear from counsel before he motion to approve the PAGA settlement is rule on.
Background
This is a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action arising out of Plaintiff, Jesus Mancilla’s (“Plaintiff”) employment with Defendant, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant”). Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Defendant. Plaintiff alleges that during his employment with Defendant, Defendant engaged in various employment practices in violation of the Cal
Hearing Date
October 13, 2020
Type
Other Employment Complaint Case (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
HEARING DATE: October 13, 2020
CASE NUMBER: BC720198
CASE NAME: Jesus Mancilla v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., et al.
MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Jesus Mancilla
RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., et al.
TRIAL DATE: None
PROOF OF SERVICE: OK
MOTION: Plaintiff’s Motion for Approval of Representative Action Settlement
OPPOSITION: None, Notice of Non-Opposition August 6, 2020
REPLY: No opposition filed.
TENTATIVE: The court wants to hear from counsel before he motion to approve the PAGA settlement is rule on.
Background
This is a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) action arising out of Plaintiff, Jesus Mancilla’s (“Plaintiff”) employment with Defendant, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. (“Defendant”). Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of himself and on behalf of all other similarly situated current and former employees of Defendant. Plaintiff alleges that during his employment with Defendant, Defendant engaged in various employment practices in violation of the Cal