1/11/19 Dept. 73 Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding SUHAILY HAMM v. CONDENSER & CHILLER SERVICES, INC, et al. (BC719746) Counsel for plaintiff/opposing party: David Denis; Timothy Kearns; Michael Yellin (Law offices of David Denis) Counsel for defendants/moving parties Mistras Group, Inc., Don Spence, and Chris Byrner: Christina Tellado; Daisy Castro; Samuel Stone (Holland & Knight) DEFENDANTS’ PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND APPLICATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS (filed 11/20/18) TENTATIVE RULING None at this time. Defendants’ reply (filed 1/7/19) indicates that Case No. BC719711, Nancy Hammond v. Condenser & Chiller Services, Inc., et al., is a complaint “alleging substantially similar allegations as those contained in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).” (See Reply, p. 3, fn. 3.) Indeed, Plaintiff Hamm claims harassment associated with Plaintiff Hammond’s own harassment claims. For reasons indicated below, on its own motion, pursuant to CRC 3.300 and Local Rule 3.3(f), the court o
Hearing Date
January 11, 2019
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
1/11/19 Dept. 73 Rafael Ongkeko, Judge presiding SUHAILY HAMM v. CONDENSER & CHILLER SERVICES, INC, et al. (BC719746) Counsel for plaintiff/opposing party: David Denis; Timothy Kearns; Michael Yellin (Law offices of David Denis) Counsel for defendants/moving parties Mistras Group, Inc., Don Spence, and Chris Byrner: Christina Tellado; Daisy Castro; Samuel Stone (Holland & Knight) DEFENDANTS’ PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND APPLICATION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS (filed 11/20/18) TENTATIVE RULING None at this time. Defendants’ reply (filed 1/7/19) indicates that Case No. BC719711, Nancy Hammond v. Condenser & Chiller Services, Inc., et al., is a complaint “alleging substantially similar allegations as those contained in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).” (See Reply, p. 3, fn. 3.) Indeed, Plaintiff Hamm claims harassment associated with Plaintiff Hammond’s own harassment claims. For reasons indicated below, on its own motion, pursuant to CRC 3.300 and Local Rule 3.3(f), the court o