SUBJECT: Demurrer to Complaint
Moving Party: Defendants Robert Holtzman and Sarah Holtzman
Resp. Party: Plaintiff Dana Cisneros
The demurrer is OVERRULED.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff commenced this action on 12/07/17 against defendants for:
(1) sex/gender discrimination in violation of FEHA;
(2) race/color/national origin/ ancestry discrimination in violation of FEHA;
(3) disability discrimination in violation of FEHA;
(4) failure to accommodate/engage in an interactive process in violation of FEHA;
(5) retaliation for requesting accommodation in violation of FEHA;
(6) hostile work environment in violation of FEHA;
(7) failure to prevent discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in violation of FEHA;
(8) wrongful termination in violation of public policy;
(9) negligent hiring and retention;
(10) non-payment of wages in violation of DLSE;
(11) failure to pay all money owed at time of termination;
(12) violation of business and professions code section 17200; and
(13) inten
Hearing Date
June 22, 2018
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUBJECT: Demurrer to Complaint
Moving Party: Defendants Robert Holtzman and Sarah Holtzman
Resp. Party: Plaintiff Dana Cisneros
The demurrer is OVERRULED.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff commenced this action on 12/07/17 against defendants for:
(1) sex/gender discrimination in violation of FEHA;
(2) race/color/national origin/ ancestry discrimination in violation of FEHA;
(3) disability discrimination in violation of FEHA;
(4) failure to accommodate/engage in an interactive process in violation of FEHA;
(5) retaliation for requesting accommodation in violation of FEHA;
(6) hostile work environment in violation of FEHA;
(7) failure to prevent discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in violation of FEHA;
(8) wrongful termination in violation of public policy;
(9) negligent hiring and retention;
(10) non-payment of wages in violation of DLSE;
(11) failure to pay all money owed at time of termination;
(12) violation of business and professions code section 17200; and
(13) inten