HEARING DATE: June 17, 2019

CASE NUMBER: BC662775

CASE NAME: Shi, et al. v. Lew, et al.

TRIAL DATE: September 24, 2019

SERVICE: OK

PROCEEDING: Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses

MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Shi

OPPOSING PARTY: Defendant Wolfsdorf Rosenthal, LLP

FILING DATE: May 21, 2019

OPPOSITION: Timely filed on June 4, 2019

REPLY: None filed as of June 13, 2019

PROCEEDING: Motion for Protective Order

MOVING PARTY: Defendant Wolfsdorf Rosenthal, LLP

OPPPOSING PARTY: Plaintiff Shi

FILING DATE: Originally filed on October 5, 2018 and amended on May 22, 2019

OPPOSITION: Timely filed on June 4, 2019

REPLY: Timely filed on June 10, 2019

TENTATIVE: Plaintiffs motion to compel further discovery responses is DENIED. Defendant Wolfsdorf Rosenthal’s motion for protective order excusing its responses to the Plaintiff’s discovery requests is therefore MOOT. Counsel for Defendant Wolfsdorf Rosenthal to give notice

This action arises out of an alleged conspiracy by Defendant