Background
This action involves claims by a deceased entertainer’s business entity for breach of a nondisclosure agreement by the entertainer’s former manager, interfering with that agreement by television producers, and related claims.
This proceeding concerns plaintiff JRE’s application for a preliminary injunction against defendant Salgado. The Court considered the moving papers, Salgado’s response, and JRE’s reply, and rules as follows.
Preliminary Injunction Standard
Preliminary injunctions can be granted only after the moving party shows there is no adequate remedy at law. Wilkison v. Wiederkehr (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 822, 832. A preliminary injunction’s main purpose is to preserve the status quo pending trial. Continental Baking Co. v. Katz (1968) 68 Cal.2d 512, 528.
“The trial court’s decision rests on the consideration of two interrelated factors: (1) the likelihood that [moving party] will prevail on the merits at trial and (2) the interim harm that [moving party] i
Hearing Date
February 27, 2017
Type
Othr Breach Contr/Warr-not Fraud (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Background
This action involves claims by a deceased entertainer’s business entity for breach of a nondisclosure agreement by the entertainer’s former manager, interfering with that agreement by television producers, and related claims.
This proceeding concerns plaintiff JRE’s application for a preliminary injunction against defendant Salgado. The Court considered the moving papers, Salgado’s response, and JRE’s reply, and rules as follows.
Preliminary Injunction Standard
Preliminary injunctions can be granted only after the moving party shows there is no adequate remedy at law. Wilkison v. Wiederkehr (2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 822, 832. A preliminary injunction’s main purpose is to preserve the status quo pending trial. Continental Baking Co. v. Katz (1968) 68 Cal.2d 512, 528.
“The trial court’s decision rests on the consideration of two interrelated factors: (1) the likelihood that [moving party] will prevail on the merits at trial and (2) the interim harm that [moving party] i