RONALD LOWE, JR., Plaintiff, vs. R-3 CONTRACTORS, et al., Defendants.
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Plaintiff Lowe’s Petition for Order Terminating Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem is GRANTED.
The Court considered the moving papers. No opposition was filed.
BACKGROUND
On August 5, 2016, Ronald Lowe, Jr., by and through his guardian ad litem, Stormy Lowe-Kinney, filed a complaint against R-3 Contractors and R3 Contractors Inc. for motor vehicle negligence based on an incident that occurred on July 6, 2016 in Playa Vista.
On August 22, 2016, the court granted applicant Stormy Lowe-Kinney’s application for appointment of guardian ad litem.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff requests an order terminating the appointment of Stormy Lowe-Kinney as guardian ad litem and order and declare that plaintiff is a competent adult and may proceed on his own behalf as plaintiff in this action as though he had originally filed as such.
The decision
Hearing Date
December 02, 2016
Type
Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
RONALD LOWE, JR., Plaintiff, vs. R-3 CONTRACTORS, et al., Defendants.
[TENTATIVE] ORDER RE:
PETITION FOR ORDER TERMINATING APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM
Plaintiff Lowe’s Petition for Order Terminating Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem is GRANTED.
The Court considered the moving papers. No opposition was filed.
BACKGROUND
On August 5, 2016, Ronald Lowe, Jr., by and through his guardian ad litem, Stormy Lowe-Kinney, filed a complaint against R-3 Contractors and R3 Contractors Inc. for motor vehicle negligence based on an incident that occurred on July 6, 2016 in Playa Vista.
On August 22, 2016, the court granted applicant Stormy Lowe-Kinney’s application for appointment of guardian ad litem.
DISCUSSION
Plaintiff requests an order terminating the appointment of Stormy Lowe-Kinney as guardian ad litem and order and declare that plaintiff is a competent adult and may proceed on his own behalf as plaintiff in this action as though he had originally filed as such.
The decision