elizabeth stern, Plaintiff, vs. weston smith manville , Defendants.
Case No.: BC617648
Hearing Date: May 2, 2017
Time: 1:30 p.m.
[Tentative] Order RE:
MOTION TO STRIKE Portions of First amended complaint
MOVING PARTY: Defendants Weston Smith Manville and Lawrence Reed Manville
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Elizabeth Stern
Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint
The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
Background
On April 20, 2015, plaintiff Elizabeth Stern filed a complaint against defendants Weston Smith Manville, Lawrence Reed Manville, and Lawrence Reed Manville 1st for motor vehicle negligence based on an incident that occurred on August 23, 2014, near Riverside Drive and Camarillo Street in Los Angeles.
On July 28, 2016, the court granted defendant Weston Smith Manville and Lawrence Reed Manville’s motion to strike portions of plaintiff’s complaint. The court struck plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages without leave to ame
Hearing Date
May 02, 2017
Type
Motor Vehicle - PI/PD/WD (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
elizabeth stern, Plaintiff, vs. weston smith manville , Defendants.
Case No.: BC617648
Hearing Date: May 2, 2017
Time: 1:30 p.m.
[Tentative] Order RE:
MOTION TO STRIKE Portions of First amended complaint
MOVING PARTY: Defendants Weston Smith Manville and Lawrence Reed Manville
RESPONDING PARTY: Plaintiff Elizabeth Stern
Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint
The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers.
Background
On April 20, 2015, plaintiff Elizabeth Stern filed a complaint against defendants Weston Smith Manville, Lawrence Reed Manville, and Lawrence Reed Manville 1st for motor vehicle negligence based on an incident that occurred on August 23, 2014, near Riverside Drive and Camarillo Street in Los Angeles.
On July 28, 2016, the court granted defendant Weston Smith Manville and Lawrence Reed Manville’s motion to strike portions of plaintiff’s complaint. The court struck plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages without leave to ame