Defendant’s (Isabella Chua) Ex Parte Application for an Order Admitting Jeffrey Gorcyca Counsel Pro Hac Vice (Application), filed on 2-24-21 under ROA No. 98, is DENIED without prejudice. Although the Moving Counsel’s (Jeffrey Gorcyca) declaration complies with California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(d), Defendant’s Notice of Continued Ex Parte Application (filed on 2-25-21 under ROA No. 108) does not show that the State Bar of California received notice of the 3-2-21 hearing as required by California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(c)(1). Therefore, the court DENIES the Application without prejudice.
Defendant is to give notice.
Hearing Date
March 02, 2021
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Defendant’s (Isabella Chua) Ex Parte Application for an Order Admitting Jeffrey Gorcyca Counsel Pro Hac Vice (Application), filed on 2-24-21 under ROA No. 98, is DENIED without prejudice. Although the Moving Counsel’s (Jeffrey Gorcyca) declaration complies with California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(d), Defendant’s Notice of Continued Ex Parte Application (filed on 2-25-21 under ROA No. 108) does not show that the State Bar of California received notice of the 3-2-21 hearing as required by California Rules of Court, rule 9.40(c)(1). Therefore, the court DENIES the Application without prejudice.
Defendant is to give notice.