Case Name: AMANDA CAST v. NATHAN MUBASHER, et al.
Case No.: SC123740 Complaint Filed: 02/06/2015
Hearing: 03/19/2019 Motion C/O: 06/14/2019
Calendar #: 5 Discovery C/O: 05/31/2019
Notice: OK Trial Date: 07/01/2019
______________________________________________________________________________
SUBJECT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
MP: Defendant Nathan Mubasher
RP: Plaintiff Amanda Cast
BACKGROUND
Factual
Plaintiff Amanda Cast (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendant Nathan Mubasher (“Defendant Mubasher”) for damages based on allegations that, essentially, Defendant Mubasher did not properly represent her in an action against her former attorney who was defending her against a libel action.
Service/filing process
Plaintiff raised issues with service of the documentary exhibits served on her. However, Plaintiff, as a party in this action, already had these documents during the litigation and Plaintiff did not specify how the missing documents
Hearing Date
March 19, 2019
Type
Legal Malpractice (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Case Name: AMANDA CAST v. NATHAN MUBASHER, et al.
Case No.: SC123740 Complaint Filed: 02/06/2015
Hearing: 03/19/2019 Motion C/O: 06/14/2019
Calendar #: 5 Discovery C/O: 05/31/2019
Notice: OK Trial Date: 07/01/2019
______________________________________________________________________________
SUBJECT: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
MP: Defendant Nathan Mubasher
RP: Plaintiff Amanda Cast
BACKGROUND
Factual
Plaintiff Amanda Cast (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendant Nathan Mubasher (“Defendant Mubasher”) for damages based on allegations that, essentially, Defendant Mubasher did not properly represent her in an action against her former attorney who was defending her against a libel action.
Service/filing process
Plaintiff raised issues with service of the documentary exhibits served on her. However, Plaintiff, as a party in this action, already had these documents during the litigation and Plaintiff did not specify how the missing documents