SUBJECT: Motion to Quash Subpoena of Employment Records
Moving Party: Plaintiff Steve Snoeck
Resp. Party: Defendant ExakTime Innovations, Inc.
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is GRANTED and awards Plaintiff sanctions of $1,360.00.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff Steve Snoeck commenced this action on June 6, 2018 against Defendant ExakTime Innovations, Inc. for (1) failure to reasonably accommodate disability; (2) failure to engage in good faith interactive process; (3) disability discrimination; (4) failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation; (5) retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act; and (6) wrongful termination in violation of public policy.
Plaintiff alleges that his employer, Defendant, terminated his employment as an Account Executive after he took an approved medical leave for his disability of sleep apnea, high blood pressure, and hypothyroidism. (Complaint, ¶¶ 8-15.)
On May 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed his motion to quash Defendant’s subpoena seeking
Hearing Date
June 04, 2019
Type
Other Breach of Contract/Warranty (not fraud or negligence) (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUBJECT: Motion to Quash Subpoena of Employment Records
Moving Party: Plaintiff Steve Snoeck
Resp. Party: Defendant ExakTime Innovations, Inc.
Plaintiff’s request for sanctions is GRANTED and awards Plaintiff sanctions of $1,360.00.
BACKGROUND:
Plaintiff Steve Snoeck commenced this action on June 6, 2018 against Defendant ExakTime Innovations, Inc. for (1) failure to reasonably accommodate disability; (2) failure to engage in good faith interactive process; (3) disability discrimination; (4) failure to prevent discrimination and retaliation; (5) retaliation in violation of the Fair Employment and Housing Act; and (6) wrongful termination in violation of public policy.
Plaintiff alleges that his employer, Defendant, terminated his employment as an Account Executive after he took an approved medical leave for his disability of sleep apnea, high blood pressure, and hypothyroidism. (Complaint, ¶¶ 8-15.)
On May 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed his motion to quash Defendant’s subpoena seeking