Hazard v Burbank Auto Parts
Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict;
Motion for New Trial
Calendar: 09
Case No.: BC629772
Hearing Date: January 17, 2020
Action Filed: August 05, 2016
Judgment:
November 26, 2019
MP:
Defendants Vehicle Effects, Inc.; and Dennis McCarthy
RP:
Plaintiff Michael Hazard
ALLEGATIONS:
The instant action arises from personal injuries suffered by Plaintiff Michael Hazard (“Plaintiff”) alleges that he was injured when an ATP Z295 replacement flywheel that was installed onto a 1996 Chevrolet Chevelle V8-396 engine suddenly and unexpectedly shattered and disintegrated. Plaintiff alleges that the flywheel was designed and manufactured in China, sold to Defendant ATP, Inc. (“ATP”), who sold it to Defendant Hanson Distributing Company, Inc. (“Hanson”), who then sold the flywheel to Defendant Burbank Auto Parts, Inc. (“BAP”), who thereafter sold it to Plaintiff.
PRESENTATION:
On November 26, 2019, the Jury returned a special verdict, finding that
Hearing Date
January 17, 2020
Type
Prdct Liablty (not asbes,tox,envir (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Hazard v Burbank Auto Parts
Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict;
Motion for New Trial
Calendar: 09
Case No.: BC629772
Hearing Date: January 17, 2020
Action Filed: August 05, 2016
Judgment:
November 26, 2019
MP:
Defendants Vehicle Effects, Inc.; and Dennis McCarthy
RP:
Plaintiff Michael Hazard
ALLEGATIONS:
The instant action arises from personal injuries suffered by Plaintiff Michael Hazard (“Plaintiff”) alleges that he was injured when an ATP Z295 replacement flywheel that was installed onto a 1996 Chevrolet Chevelle V8-396 engine suddenly and unexpectedly shattered and disintegrated. Plaintiff alleges that the flywheel was designed and manufactured in China, sold to Defendant ATP, Inc. (“ATP”), who sold it to Defendant Hanson Distributing Company, Inc. (“Hanson”), who then sold the flywheel to Defendant Burbank Auto Parts, Inc. (“BAP”), who thereafter sold it to Plaintiff.
PRESENTATION:
On November 26, 2019, the Jury returned a special verdict, finding that