August 10, 2010
40
Civil - Unlimited
PI/PD/WD - Auto
Amtrak (Defendant)
Track This PartyCal Trans (Defendant)
Track This PartyElizabeth Johansing Partne… (Defendant)
Track This PartyJ D Mc Grath Farms (Defendant)
Track This PartyJ.D. McGrath Farms LLC (Defendant), represented by JAMES N. II PROCTER
Track This PartyLongford Partners LP (Defendant)
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMcGrath Family Farms (Defendant)
Track This PartyState of California (Defendant)
Track This PartyUnion Pacfiic Corporation (Defendant)
Track This PartyWolf, Joseph (Defendant)
Track This PartyYoung, David Family Trust (Defendant)
Track This PartyNational Railroad Passenge… (Cross - Complainant)
Track This PartyUnion Pacific Railroad Com… (Cross - Complainant)
Track This PartyAggeler, Terence (Defendant), represented by DUSTIN WELLS
Track This PartyAmtrak (Defendant)
Track This PartyCal Trans (Defendant)
Track This PartyElizabeth M Johansing Partnership (Defendant), represented by TERRENCE J BONHAM
Track This PartyJ D Mc Grath Farms (Defendant)
Track This PartyJ.D. McGrath Farms LLC (Defendant), represented by JAMES N. II PROCTER
Track This PartyLongford Partners LP (Defendant)
Track This PartyM Johansing Partnership (Defendant)
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by WILLIAM WEILBACHER
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by WILLIAM WEILBACHER
Track This PartyMcGrath Family Farms (Defendant)
Track This PartyNational Railroad Passenger Corporation (Defendant), represented by Michael E Murphy
Track This PartyState of California (Defendant)
Track This PartyThe People of The State of California, acting by and through The Department of Transportation (Defendant), represented by Michael E Murphy
Track This PartyThe People of The State of California, acting by and through The Department of Transportation (Defendant), represented by Alexander Prieto
Track This PartyUnion Pacfiic Corporation (Defendant)
Track This PartyUnion Pacific Railroad Company (Defendant), represented by Michael E Murphy
Track This PartyWolf, Joseph (Defendant)
Track This PartyYoung, David Family Trust (Defendant)
Track This PartyHernandez, Gilbert Ronald (Cross - Defendant), represented by BENJAMIN F. COATS
Track This PartyHernandez, Jordan Michael (Cross - Defendant), represented by BENJAMIN F. COATS
Track This PartyJ.D. McGrath Farms LLC (Cross - Complainant), represented by JAMES N. II PROCTER
Track This PartyAggeler, Terence (Cross - Complainant), represented by DUSTIN WELLS
Track This PartyHernandez, Gilbert Ronald (Cross - Defendant), represented by BENJAMIN F. COATS
Track This PartyHernandez, Jordan Michael (Cross - Defendant), represented by BENJAMIN F. COATS
Track This PartyHernandez, Gilbert Ronald (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyHernandez, Jordan Michael (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyLongford Partners LP (Cross - Complainant), represented by LISA N SHYER
Track This PartyZoes 1 through 50 (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyAggeler, Terence (Cross - Defendant), represented by FRED KRAKAUER
Track This PartyDavid Young Family Trust (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyHernandez, Jordan (Cross - Complainant), represented by BRIAN A. OSBORNE
Track This PartyJ D Mc Grath Farms (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyJ.D. McGrath Farms LLC (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyJoseph Wolf Living Trust S… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyLongford Partners LLP (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyNational Railroad Passenge… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartySeries VI 4880 Colt Street… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyUnion Pacific Railroad Com… (Cross - Defendant)
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by WILLIAM WEILBACHER
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by WILLIAM WEILBACHER
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Desti (Plaintiff), represented by WILLIAM WEILBACHER
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by ALLEN R. BALL
Track This PartyMabee, Doug (Plaintiff), represented by WILLIAM WEILBACHER
Track This Party2011-02-04T08:30:00
2010-08-13T08:20:00
2010-07-12T08:30:00
2010-07-08T08:20:00
2010-07-01T08:20:00
2010-06-11T08:20:00
2010-06-08T08:20:00
2010-04-12T08:20:00
2010-03-23T08:30:00
2010-03-19T08:20:00
2010-03-10T08:20:00
2010-01-19T08:20:00
2009-12-02T08:20:00
2009-10-14T08:20:00
2009-08-07T08:20:00
2009-07-31T08:30:00
2009-07-30T08:20:00
2009-07-14T08:20:00
In the Matter of Jasper Williams
In Re: George R. Ryan, III Trust
In The Matter Of Sue Ellen Driver
In the Matter of The James Kolling Trust, Dtd. March 17, 2005
In the Matter of The George F. Ryan, III Trust
The Matter of The Holly A Tanner Revocable Trust
In the Matter of Gwyneth M. Bealer
In the Matter of The Kenneth Thomaier Trust Dtd. June 3, 2015
JENNA MICHELLE PREWITT LITIGATION TRUST
In The Matter of Joshua Isaac Telson
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Please wait a moment while we load this page.
Ds J.D. McGrath Farms and Longford Partners (collectively "McGrath Ds") move for SJ. The motion is based upon the declaration of a professional surveyor, who has mapped boundary lines (McKellar decl., at ex. "D"); and a series of initially unauthenticated and unhighlighted (C.f., CRC 3.1116(c)) deposition transcripts (McGrath Ds' "Index", at exs. "E"-"H"), including its own principal and its employee, in lieu of their own declarations. The McGrath Ds contend that they are shielded by the "recreational use" immunity of Civil Code § 846; that the McGrath Ds could not have added safety features to the railroad crossing even if they wanted to; and that they have no duty to protect people from injury on another property.
After the Court issued its tentative ruling, the McGrath defendants submitted a timely reply which shored up the deficiencies of its evidence and formatting. The Court is obligated to consider these (Villa v. McFerren (1995) 35 Cal. App. 4th 733, 751), and deems them suffic