Defendants’ (Michael Raymond Perry and The Perry Law Firm) Motion to Strike (Anti-SLAPP) Plaintiff’s Complaint (Motion), filed on 1-2-20 under ROA No. 12, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth below.
Defendants’ Objections filed on 3-30-20 under ROA No. 38: The court SUSTAINS Objection Nos. 21, 23, 24, 38, 43, 46, 49, 50, 53, 54, 60, and 61. The court OVERRULES the remaining objections.
Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, subdivision (b), states, in part, “(1) A cause of action against a person arising from any act of that person in furtherance of the person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States Constitution or the California Constitution in connection with a public issue shall be subject to a special motion to strike, unless the court determines that the plaintiff has established that there is a probability that the plaintiff will prevail on the claim. [¶] (2) In making its determination, the court shall consider the pleadings, and supporting and