Search anything: judges, parties, opposing counsel, motion types, legal issues
(Subscribe to View)
Track This Case
September 28, 2020
Orange County, CA
Oct 19, 2020
Oct 14, 2020
Sep 21, 2020
Aug 17, 2020
Aug 03, 2020
Mar 25, 2019
Bellino Vs. Judge
Cooper Vs. Millcreek Farming Associates, Llc
P.D. Electric Inc. Vs. Via Socorro Estates, Llc
Godinez Vs. Universal Building Maintenance, Llc
Clark Vs. Clark
Walters Wholesale Electric Co. Vs. P.D. Electric, Inc
Wesco Insurance Company Vs. D&T Global Communications Inc.
Torres Vs. Brown
S.B. Vs. Ocean View School District
1. Motion for Preference Moving Party: Plaintiff Victor Partaker Responding Party: Defendant Hyundai Motor America Ruling: Ruling: Plaintiff’s motion for trial preference pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 36 is denied without prejudice. Code of Civil Procedure section 36(a) states that a party to a civil action who is over 70 years of age may petition the court for a preference, which the court “shall grant” if the court makes both of the following findings: (1) the party has a substantial interest in the action as a whole and (2) the health of the party is such that a preference is necessary to prevent prejudicing the party’s interest in the litigation. Upon the granting of a preference motion, the court “shall set” the matter for trial not more than 120 days from that date. (Id. § 36(f).) The clear intent of the Legislature is to safeguard litigants who qualify under section 36(a) against the acknowledged risk that death or incapacity might depriv........
Your alert tracking was succesfully added. We will email you
when new changes related to are available.
You can see and mange all your Tracking alerts under Alert Settings
Add to your subscription and access more dockets and more documents!
Your subscription was successfully upgraded
Please wait a moment while we load this page.