SUBJECT: Application for Order Sealing Portions of Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash
Moving Party: Plaintiff Martha Sillman
Resp. Party: None
Plaintiff’s application for an order sealing portions of Plaintiff’s motion to quash is GRANTED.
PRELIMINARY COMMENT:
It appears that Plaintiff’s counsel may have copied and pasted a portion of another client’s pleadings within this instant application. For example, the memorandum of points and authorities discusses a Motion in Limine No. 2 and “highly sensitive personal information relating to Plaintiff’s minor child, who is not a party to this action.” (Application, p. 2:13-15.) Plaintiff also cites to the declaration of counsel Carney R. Shegarian; however, the declaration attached to the Application is from Plaintiff’s other counsel, Aaron G. Gbewonyo. (Id. at p. 2:11-15; Gbewonyo Decl.) Further, despite a lack of opposition, Plaintiff filed a reply. Although the two-page Reply is directed to this case, the caption of the pleading states: “Pla
Hearing Date
October 21, 2020
Type
Wrongful Termination (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
SUBJECT: Application for Order Sealing Portions of Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash
Moving Party: Plaintiff Martha Sillman
Resp. Party: None
Plaintiff’s application for an order sealing portions of Plaintiff’s motion to quash is GRANTED.
PRELIMINARY COMMENT:
It appears that Plaintiff’s counsel may have copied and pasted a portion of another client’s pleadings within this instant application. For example, the memorandum of points and authorities discusses a Motion in Limine No. 2 and “highly sensitive personal information relating to Plaintiff’s minor child, who is not a party to this action.” (Application, p. 2:13-15.) Plaintiff also cites to the declaration of counsel Carney R. Shegarian; however, the declaration attached to the Application is from Plaintiff’s other counsel, Aaron G. Gbewonyo. (Id. at p. 2:11-15; Gbewonyo Decl.) Further, despite a lack of opposition, Plaintiff filed a reply. Although the two-page Reply is directed to this case, the caption of the pleading states: “Pla