TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 1
Date: 5/31/19
Case No: 18 GDCV00110 Trial Date: April 20, 2020
Case Name: Valle Lindo School District v. Los Angeles SMSA Limited
Partnership dba Verizon Wireless
DEMURRER
MOTION TO STRIKE
[CCP §430.10 et. seq.]
Moving Party: Defendant Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership dba Verizon Wireless
Responding Party: Plaintiff Valle Lindo School District
RULING:
Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is OVERRULED for the reasons stated in the opposition. All elements of the second cause of action for private nuisance and third cause of action for trespass are sufficiently alleged.
Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is DENIED for the reasons stated in the opposition. The request for punitive damages is sufficiently alleged. Corporate ratification is sufficiently alleged at paragraph 18.
UNOPPOSED Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Demu
Hearing Date
May 31, 2019
Type
Quiet Title (General Jurisdiction)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
TENTATIVE RULING
Calendar: 1
Date: 5/31/19
Case No: 18 GDCV00110 Trial Date: April 20, 2020
Case Name: Valle Lindo School District v. Los Angeles SMSA Limited
Partnership dba Verizon Wireless
DEMURRER
MOTION TO STRIKE
[CCP §430.10 et. seq.]
Moving Party: Defendant Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership dba Verizon Wireless
Responding Party: Plaintiff Valle Lindo School District
RULING:
Demurrer to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is OVERRULED for the reasons stated in the opposition. All elements of the second cause of action for private nuisance and third cause of action for trespass are sufficiently alleged.
Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is DENIED for the reasons stated in the opposition. The request for punitive damages is sufficiently alleged. Corporate ratification is sufficiently alleged at paragraph 18.
UNOPPOSED Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Demu