The demurrer of Cross-Defendants Julie Dahl, Lori Thompson, Mary Dippel and Bill Dippel to Tiffany Edwards' Cross-Complaint is sustained in part and overruled in part. On Cross-Defendants Dahl, Thompson, Dippel and Dippel's demurrer to all causes of action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the demurrer to the first, second and third causes of action is sustained without leave to amend. The demurrer to the fourth cause of action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is overruled on the grounds that a wrongful discharge claim is not subject to an exhaustion requirement. Rojo v. Kliger (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 65. On Cross-Defendants Dahl, Thompson, Dippel and Dippel's demurrer to all causes of action for failure to state a cause of action on the grounds of sham pleading, the demurrer is overruled. On Cross-Defendants Dahl and Thompson's demurrer to the second, third and fourth causes of action for failure to state a cause of action on the grounds that Dahl and Thompson ar
Hearing Date
August 14, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
The demurrer of Cross-Defendants Julie Dahl, Lori Thompson, Mary Dippel and Bill Dippel to Tiffany Edwards' Cross-Complaint is sustained in part and overruled in part. On Cross-Defendants Dahl, Thompson, Dippel and Dippel's demurrer to all causes of action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the demurrer to the first, second and third causes of action is sustained without leave to amend. The demurrer to the fourth cause of action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is overruled on the grounds that a wrongful discharge claim is not subject to an exhaustion requirement. Rojo v. Kliger (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 65. On Cross-Defendants Dahl, Thompson, Dippel and Dippel's demurrer to all causes of action for failure to state a cause of action on the grounds of sham pleading, the demurrer is overruled. On Cross-Defendants Dahl and Thompson's demurrer to the second, third and fourth causes of action for failure to state a cause of action on the grounds that Dahl and Thompson ar