On October 02, 2020 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Cerda Trujillo, Abraham,
and
Benitez Jr., Alex John,
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. Registered Owner,
for Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
SUPERIOR
F l LEE L
coum 0.: c QLIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN BERNAnojwn
SAN BERNARDINO D STRIC I.
P‘
SUPERIOR COURT AP“ t .
9 7 20 21
coUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO
247 West Third Street, Departmen.
S an B ema rd! no
Ca Hf0r nl a 92415
.
BY (W m U,
AMIE ARROY 3, dEPUTY
II
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ij f9 (7"
RU Y \ \U '
cC 3
Plfaintifi Case No: Q\\} ‘03) O 90x) 1
>
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY
10 CONFERENCE
-V
1'1
12 (flkm x M. ?v
‘13 Defendant
~14
THE COURT‘ORDERS THE FOLLOWING:
15
Prior toany party filing any discovery motioh in this action, the moving party must
16
.schedule and complete a tglephonic discovery conference with allparties and the Court. Failure“
1T
for theopposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order.
1B Ii
The purpose of the discovery conference isto tryand resolve the discovery issues without the
19
necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute
willbe discussed
20
’as well as potential referral of the
case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code.
21
Referral to JR Is relatlvely rare but nonetheless, is-
a_ possibility afterthis'conference. The time
22
for bringing any discovery motion necessary, be
if will tolled by any delay caused by the
23
telephonic conference.
24
Failure to this Order will result in Sanctions.
qge‘f
25
Dated this day 9f _W_ 2
26
27
28
ORDER
-1-
Document Filed Date
April 07, 2021
Case Filing Date
October 02, 2020
Category
Personal Injury Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR F l LEE L coum 0.: c QLIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNAnojwn SAN BERNARDINO D STRIC I. P‘ SUPERIOR COURT AP“ t . 9 7 20 21 coUNTY 0F SAN BERNARDINO 247 West Third Street, Departmen. S an B ema rd! no Ca Hf0r nl a 92415 . BY (W m U, AMIE ARROY 3, dEPUTY II IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ij f9 (7" RU Y \ \U ' cC 3 Plfaintifi Case No: Q\\} ‘03) O 90x) 1 > ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 10 CONFERENCE -V 1'1 12 (flkm x M. ?v ‘13 Defendant ~14 THE COURT‘ORDERS THE FOLLOWING: 15 Prior toany party filing any discovery motioh in this action, the moving party must 16 .schedule and complete a tglephonic discovery conference with allparties and the Court. Failure“ 1T for theopposing party to cooperate does not constitute reason not to comply with this order. 1B Ii The purpose of the discovery conference isto tryand resolve the discovery issues without the 19 necessity of a motion. At the conference, the issues of the discovery dispute willbe discussed 20 ’as well as potential referral of the case out to Judicial Reference (JR) pursuant to code. 21 Referral to JR Is relatlvely rare but nonetheless, is- a_ possibility afterthis'conference. The time 22 for bringing any discovery motion necessary, be if will tolled by any delay caused by the 23 telephonic conference. 24 Failure to this Order will result in Sanctions. qge‘f 25 Dated this day 9f _W_ 2 26 27 28 ORDER -1-