On January 27, 2020 a
Miscellaneous
was filed
involving a dispute between
Hardy, Illya,
Hardy, Johanna Barlund,
Topline K9 Services,
and
Animal Emergency Clinic,
Rios, Dvm, Grace,
for Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
in the District Court of San Bernardino County.
Preview
C
FCkt COi1RT tiSE ONLY
ATTORNEY OR F TY WITHOUT ATTqRNEY Narne Ststa 8arntanbar a sd edrhsxsl
JTLL L RY H R SNB 266Q 1
RY IEiER I AW GROUP t LP
PCa BUX 8fi3
IL YLLWTI D CA 92549
Y rtokF vo 951 6 4t 4S ac a 3 l 0 7 9192
C
Arro Fo r
Ill a H rd Jo ann Barlund Hard T a line K9 S rvices
A i
t r ro s
TRl T
r
San Bernadinc
UPERlOR COURT QF CAUFQRNIA C lNTY OF c p
a
szr s Roos ss 2 W 3rd St n
i J
MAILiNG ADDRESS L YY 2d C A Iy
CRY ANO 21P CQDE
sr c E C unt G vernrn nt C ffice
x r3 1
GASE NAME Y
I SRNDRla OATEGPIJDEPUlY
H fC VS R10S t r
cns r unaa R
CiVt CASE GOVER SH ET Cotnptex Gase Ctes gna ion
Uniimited E im ed
Caunter Joind r
Amaun Amount
demanded demanded is Fil d with firs ap arance by def ndant
EPr
exaeeds 25 000 25 D00 ar less Cal Fiules af Court rule 3 4Q2
ttems i 8 helow musl be campfeted s e fnstructtat s an a s 2
1 Checic one box be ow or the case type that best describes this case
Auta 7ort Gcrr ct Provislonally Cvmp x Civii Lltlgation
Cal Rufes of Court rules 3 4qt1 3 4D3
ty t
C a eo z Breach ot cantracV x rrar
0
C3ther PUPDMIt3
Uninsured rrwtaelst
Peraona lnJuryfP roperty
46
0
Ruf
Oth
3 74Q cait
zr coileckians
ctions
OS
09
0t AtftiErustlTrade regutation
Construction defect 1p
Q3
DamagelV1 olt gful D ath Tork Q Insurance cvverage 18
tt JI1 Mass tc rt 4Q
t S S OS 1
a 14 t COfi2f8C 37 l J BGU 1 tL S Ilt 8 t1t1
Praduct liability 24 pr y EnvironmentaU oxic taK 30
y
Medical m alpradice 45
a Ern r ent dom inllrrverse 0 insurance coverage Gaims arising from the
condemnation f4 above iisted provisionaiiy camptex case
Ottrer PUPDlW 23
types 41
Wrongfu e icUon 33
No P1tPtltWCi C the Tart
Business tartlunfai busirtess p actice 07 0 r real praperty 26 Er fsrrcement af Judgment
Civi rights d8 Unta wrftt Detain r 0 Enfarcement of judgmen 2p
Commercisi 31 t 9tscetlaneous Giuii Cvmplaint
Refama on 13
t t
Frauc 16 Res deratiai j32 t RICO 27
I
D ugs 3
Inteilectuai P Pe Y 19 i Qther tomplaint not sp cifred a ve 42
25 u dl Review
Professiatra negtfgence
Jr Asset fprf iture
A laceitaneous CiWi Pe itloa
Other P1fPDNVU tcut 35 LJ t 5
Y E r an Partnership and corporate gavernance 21
Erre lvyment Petition re arbitrat3an award 11
Other petition nat s sc rfied above 43
Wrongtui terminatiAn 36 Wr Of mandate t2
0 c3ther empioyment 15 C the udicia review 39
2 This case is is not complex under rule 3 4QQ of fhe Califamia F2ules af Court If the case is camp ex mark th
factars requiring exceptional judicial managemeni
a Large numb er of separa e y representsd parties d arge numt er o wRnesses
b 0 Eattensive mt tion pract3ce raising dif cult ar nov l e Q aordination with relat d actions pending in ons or more courts
issues thai wi i be time ctsnsurr irtg to resotve in ather countiss s ates or caun ri s or in a federal cou t
c Substantiai amounf at documenkary evidence i Subsiantlal pc s udgment judlcisl sup rvision
3 Remsdies saught eheck aJJ that tpplY a rrtan tary b Q nonmanetary declatalary ar inju ctive relief C 7UttI IYS
4 Nttmber of causes of actlan speclfy Nt g CanversiQn Breach ConCract Unfair bus Breach Iiailrnent IIED
5 This case Q is is r ot a ciass acti n suit
Yau m use iorm CM 015
6 IP th re are sny known refated eases file nd serve a nafice o related case
E7ate 1 J 2 20
TILL L YTHER
TYP OR Pf21NT NRME tC3 OF PARTY OFi AT7QRNEY FOI FARTY
Plai tifE musi file this caver shee wi h the ftrst paper fil d in the action or proceeding except sma0 ciaims eases or cases filed
under ths Probate Code Family Code ar Weifare nd Instikutions Code Cai F2ules of Cnurt rule 3 220 Failure to file may re utt
in sanctions
ile this covef sheet in adc itio a any cover sheet requited by lacal court rule
I this case is complex under rule 3 40fl e seq of the Catitomia Rules of Caurt You must serve a capy of this cov shee on all
ather parties to the actian ar proceeding
Un4sss this is a collectit ns case under ruie 3 740 oe a complsx cas this eover sheei wip be used for st tist cal purposes onl 1 af 2
r zw s wc a a s xzsr a aao aos s ao
F4 sao
r a ea y u a
GIV1L GAS C if R FIE T
Jutiiaial Caura l ot CePfinrnie Cai St G ds af Judica A fmin tration aW 3 iG
www courikrla ca gov
CM Q50 Rev July 1 2U07J
Document Filed Date
January 27, 2020
Case Filing Date
January 27, 2020
Category
Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
C FCkt COi1RT tiSE ONLY ATTORNEY OR F TY WITHOUT ATTqRNEY Narne Ststa 8arntanbar a sd edrhsxsl JTLL L RY H R SNB 266Q 1 RY IEiER I AW GROUP t LP PCa BUX 8fi3 IL YLLWTI D CA 92549 Y rtokF vo 951 6 4t 4S ac a 3 l 0 7 9192 C Arro Fo r Ill a H rd Jo ann Barlund Hard T a line K9 S rvices A i t r ro s TRl T r San Bernadinc UPERlOR COURT QF CAUFQRNIA C lNTY OF c p a szr s Roos ss 2 W 3rd St n i J MAILiNG ADDRESS L YY 2d C A Iy CRY ANO 21P CQDE sr c E C unt G vernrn nt C ffice x r3 1 GASE NAME Y I SRNDRla OATEGPIJDEPUlY H fC VS R10S t r cns r unaa R CiVt CASE GOVER SH ET Cotnptex Gase Ctes gna ion Uniimited E im ed Caunter Joind r Amaun Amount demanded demanded is Fil d with firs ap arance by def ndant EPr exaeeds 25 000 25 D00 ar less Cal Fiules af Court rule 3 4Q2 ttems i 8 helow musl be campfeted s e fnstructtat s an a s 2 1 Checic one box be ow or the case type that best describes this case Auta 7ort Gcrr ct Provislonally Cvmp x Civii Lltlgation Cal Rufes of Court rules 3 4qt1 3 4D3 ty t C a eo z Breach ot cantracV x rrar 0 C3ther PUPDMIt3 Uninsured rrwtaelst Peraona lnJuryfP roperty 46 0 Ruf Oth 3 74Q cait zr coileckians ctions OS 09 0t AtftiErustlTrade regutation Construction defect 1p Q3 DamagelV1 olt gful D ath Tork Q Insurance cvverage 18 tt JI1 Mass tc rt 4Q t S S OS 1 a 14 t COfi2f8C 37 l J BGU 1 tL S Ilt 8 t1t1 Praduct liability 24 pr y EnvironmentaU oxic taK 30 y Medical m alpradice 45 a Ern r ent dom inllrrverse 0 insurance coverage Gaims arising from the condemnation f4 above iisted provisionaiiy camptex case Ottrer PUPDlW 23 types 41 Wrongfu e icUon 33 No P1tPtltWCi C the Tart Business tartlunfai busirtess p actice 07 0 r real praperty 26 Er fsrrcement af Judgment Civi rights d8 Unta wrftt Detain r 0 Enfarcement of judgmen 2p Commercisi 31 t 9tscetlaneous Giuii Cvmplaint Refama on 13 t t Frauc 16 Res deratiai j32 t RICO 27 I D ugs 3 Inteilectuai P Pe Y 19 i Qther tomplaint not sp cifred a ve 42 25 u dl Review Professiatra negtfgence Jr Asset fprf iture A laceitaneous CiWi Pe itloa Other P1fPDNVU tcut 35 LJ t 5 Y E r an Partnership and corporate gavernance 21 Erre lvyment Petition re arbitrat3an award 11 Other petition nat s sc rfied above 43 Wrongtui terminatiAn 36 Wr Of mandate t2 0 c3ther empioyment 15 C the udicia review 39 2 This case is is not complex under rule 3 4QQ of fhe Califamia F2ules af Court If the case is camp ex mark th factars requiring exceptional judicial managemeni a Large numb er of separa e y representsd parties d arge numt er o wRnesses b 0 Eattensive mt tion pract3ce raising dif cult ar nov l e Q aordination with relat d actions pending in ons or more courts issues thai wi i be time ctsnsurr irtg to resotve in ather countiss s ates or caun ri s or in a federal cou t c Substantiai amounf at documenkary evidence i Subsiantlal pc s udgment judlcisl sup rvision 3 Remsdies saught eheck aJJ that tpplY a rrtan tary b Q nonmanetary declatalary ar inju ctive relief C 7UttI IYS 4 Nttmber of causes of actlan speclfy Nt g CanversiQn Breach ConCract Unfair bus Breach Iiailrnent IIED 5 This case Q is is r ot a ciass acti n suit Yau m use iorm CM 015 6 IP th re are sny known refated eases file nd serve a nafice o related case E7ate 1 J 2 20 TILL L YTHER TYP OR Pf21NT NRME tC3 OF PARTY OFi AT7QRNEY FOI FARTY Plai tifE musi file this caver shee wi h the ftrst paper fil d in the action or proceeding except sma0 ciaims eases or cases filed under ths Probate Code Family Code ar Weifare nd Instikutions Code Cai F2ules of Cnurt rule 3 220 Failure to file may re utt in sanctions ile this covef sheet in adc itio a any cover sheet requited by lacal court rule I this case is complex under rule 3 40fl e seq of the Catitomia Rules of Caurt You must serve a capy of this cov shee on all ather parties to the actian ar proceeding Un4sss this is a collectit ns case under ruie 3 740 oe a complsx cas this eover sheei wip be used for st tist cal purposes onl 1 af 2 r zw s wc a a s xzsr a aao aos s ao F4 sao r a ea y u a GIV1L GAS C if R FIE T Jutiiaial Caura l ot CePfinrnie Cai St G ds af Judica A fmin tration aW 3 iG www courikrla ca gov CM Q50 Rev July 1 2U07J