Clerk Notice: Bank of America, N.A. -v- Gonzales et al Print

On July 02, 2021 a Clerk Notice was filed involving a dispute between Bank Of America, N.A., and Does 1-5, Gonzales, Doreen Amelia, for Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited in the District Court of San Bernardino County.

Preview
DocuSign EnvelopeID:61BEE1 F7-2A01-4ADC-BBSF-F8ACE‘ )EOE
‘

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNSA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

Bank of America, N.A.
Cas€N.SB_u_L9_1_9_8_
vs‘ CERTIFICATE OF ASSIGNMENT
DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES

A civii action or proceeding presented for filing must be accompanied by this Certiﬁcate. the ground
If
isthe residence of a party, name and residence shall be stated.

The undersigned declares that the above-entitled matter is filed for proceedings in the
SAN BERNARD'NO District of the Superior Court under Ruie131 and General Order
of this court for the checked reason:
D General E Collection
Nature of Action Ground
D 1. Adoption Petitioner resides within the district
D
.

2. Conservator Petitioner or conservatee resides within the district.
3, Contract Performance inthe district isexpressly provided for.
D 4. Equity The cause of action arose within the district.
D 5. Eminent Domain The property is iocated within the district.
D 6. Family Law defendant, petitioner or respondent resides within the district.
Plaintiff,

D 7. Guardianship Petitioner orward resides within the district or has property within the district.
D 8. Harassment defendant, petitioner or respondent resides within the
Plaintiff, district.
D 9. Mandate The defendant functions whoﬂy within the district.
D 10. Name Change The petitioner resides within the district.
D 11. Personal Injury The injury occurred within the district.
D 12. Personal Property The property is iomted within the district.
D 13. Probate Decedent resided or resides within or had property within the district.
D 14. Prohibition The defendant functions wholly within the district.
D 15. Review The defendant functions wholly within the district.
[j 16. Title to Real Property The property is located within the district.
D 17. Transferred Action The lower court is located withiri the district.
D 18. Unlawful Detainer The property is located within the district.
D 19. Domestic Violence The petitioner, defendant, plaintiff or respondent resides within the district.
20. Other DEBT COLLECTION
D 21. THIS FILING WOULD NORMALLY FALL WITHIN JURISDICTION OF SUPERIOR COURT
The address of the accident, performance, party, detention. place of business, or other factor which qualiﬁes this
case for ﬁling in theabove-designed district is:

“mmmmmvme
DOREEN AMELIA GONZALES
FACTOR
14588 OSAGE RD
ADDRESS

APPLE VALLEY CA 92307-4003
ClTY STATE ZIPCODE
Ideciare, under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct and that this deciaration was

w
executed on 06/24/2021 at SOUTH PASADENA
California.

o! Attomsy/Party
FLINT C. ZIDE
Form 1346503460
43
CERTIFlCATE OF ASSIGNMENT Rev, June 2019
Mandatory Use
‘. Iv. l .5;-
'
.

_ y x3 ,

Case Info

Judge

Ronald J Gilbert Track Judge’s New Case

Case No.

(Subscribe to View)

Document Filed Date

July 02, 2021

Case Filing Date

July 02, 2021

County

Parties

Related Content in San Bernardino County

Case

Jul 15, 2024 | Wilfred J Schneider, Jr. | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422674

Case

TD Bank USA, N.A. -v- CALA et al Print

Jul 12, 2024 | Michael A Sachs | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422552

Case

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. -v- Ruiz Print

Jul 16, 2024 | Nicole Quintana Winter | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422855

Case

Capital One N.a. -v- Verdin Print

Jul 16, 2024 | . TBD | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422834

Case

OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print

Jul 12, 2024 | Charlie L Hill, Jr. | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422560

Case

Jpmorgan Chase Bank N.a. -v- Schumacher Print

Jul 15, 2024 | Stephanie Thornton-Harris | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000.01 - $35,000 Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000.01 - $35,000 Limited | CIVSB2422566

Case

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC -v- Luis M Valdezaguilar et al Print

Jul 17, 2024 | Carlos Cabrera | Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections -Reduced Filing Fee Limited | CIVSB2422928

Case

SYNCHRONY BANK -v- SANCHEZ et al Print

Jul 16, 2024 | Corey G Lee | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422799

Case

Discover Bank -v- Santana Print

Jul 12, 2024 | Jeffrey R Erickson | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422601

Ruling

Synchrony Bank vs Dianna Rodriguez

Jul 24, 2024 | 23CV-03604

23CV-03604 Synchrony Bank v. Dianna Rodriguez Motion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admitted Appearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the court at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.

Ruling

JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K

Aug 05, 2024 | S-CV-0051944

S-CV-0051944 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K ** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouraged Appearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading, default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K

Ruling

PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC VS. CHRISTINA RANGEL ET AL

Jul 23, 2024 | CGC17559532

Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 1. PLAINTIFF PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC's HEARING ON CLAIM OF EXEMPTION. Continued to August 6, 2024 on the court's motion. =(302/CK)

Ruling

DISCOVER BANK vs CERVANTES

Jul 27, 2024 | Frank Anthony Moschetti | CVCO2300997

DISCOVER BANK VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL CVCO2300997 CERVANTES FOR CAROLINA CERVANTES Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.

Ruling

DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL

Jul 25, 2024 | CV-23-006622

CV-23-006622 – DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL – Plaintiff Discover Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings – GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and unopposed. The Court GRANTS the request to take judicial notice of the answer and complaint filed in this case. The answer admits all allegations in the complaint as true and does not assert any affirmative defenses. Based on the pleadings, the Court finds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against the defendant, and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1)(A).) Defendant, who did not oppose this motion, has not given the Court any reason to grant leave to amend. (Cf. Today's IV, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 1137, 1176, reh'g denied (Oct. 25, 2022), review denied (Jan. 18, 2023).) Consequently, the unopposed motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court will sign the proposed order and the proposed judgment submitted by Plaintiff. Court trial date to be vacated. Due to the interruption of telephone service as a result of an outage, any party requesting a hearing must make the request via email to the court clerk. If V-Court is not available and an in-person appearance is not possible, appearance must be via Zoom. Sign-up information for Zoom will be available on the court’s website.

Ruling

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc., vs. Castro

Jul 24, 2024 | 23CVG-00362

CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., VS. CASTRO Case Number: 23CVG-00362 Tentative Ruling on Motion for Terminating Sanctions: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. moves for terminating sanctions by striking Defendant Vincent Castro’s answer. Plaintiff also requests sanctions in the amount of $1,572.75 for each motion. Procedural Defect: As a procedural matter, this motion was served both via mail and email on May 9, 2024, and set for a hearing date of June 7, 2024. CCP § 1005(b) requires all moving papers be served 16 court days before the hearing. This notice period is extended by five calendar days if the motion is served by mail. Id. For service by email, the notice period is extended by two court days. CCP § 1010.6(a)(3). This timeframe is calculated by counting backwards from the hearing date but excluding the hearing date. CCP § 12c. Starting with the June 7, 2024, hearing date and counting backwards 16 court days (excluding the Court holiday of May 27, 2024) then five calendar days for out of state mailing this matter should have been served by mail no later than, May 4, 2024. For email the last day to serve the motion was April 24, 2024. The motion was served on May 7, 2024, and was untimely under either calculation. Based on insufficient statutory notice, the motion is denied. Merits of Motion: Even if the motion had been timely noticed, terminating sanctions are not warranted. Terminating sanctions are a “drastic penalty and should be used sparingly.” Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 604. A terminating sanction should not generally be imposed by the court until less severe sanctions have been attempted and were unsuccessful. Id. No justification has been provided as to why terminating sanctions are appropriate in this context instead of lesser evidentiary or issue sanctions. Without additional evidence, terminating sanctions would be premature. The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was lodged with the Court which will be modified to reflect the denial. Review Hearing: This matter is also on calendar for review regarding trial re-setting. The Court designates this matter as a Plan II case and intends on setting it for trial no later than October 15, 2024. An appearance is necessary on today’s calendar to discuss available trial dates.

Ruling

Value Recovery Group. L.P. vs. Sidebar Legal, PC, et al.

Jul 27, 2024 | 23CV-0201860

ET AL. Case Number: 23CV-0201860 Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on June 24, 2024, pursuant to Gov’t Code § 68608(b) to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s Counsel for failure to appear at the June 17, 2024, hearing as ordered on February 20, 2024. No response to the OSC has been filed. The Court previously sanctioned Plaintiff and Counsel for failure to timely serve the parties. The parties have not been served. The sanctions have not been paid. It appears Plaintiff has abandoned this action and lesser sanctions would not be effective. The Court DISMISSES this action. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate Order of Dismissal. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar. ****************************************************************************** 9:00 a.m. Review Hearings ******************************************************************************

Ruling

Sierra Central Credit Union vs. Goodwin

Jul 23, 2024 | 23CVG-00253

SIERRA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION VS. GOODWIN Case Number: 23CVG-00253 This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement informing the Court that the stay is still in effect. The matter is continued to Tuesday, January 23, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.

Document

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. -v- Ramirez Print

Jan 31, 2023 | Tony Raphael | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2300715

Document

Discover Bank -v- Hossein Print

Nov 30, 2023 | Tanada, Stephanie | Other Collections Unlimited | Other Collections Unlimited | CIVSB2331185

Document

OPORTUN, INC -v- Martinez Print

Jul 16, 2024 | Tanada, Stephanie | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422781

Document

Capital One N.a. -v- Evora Print

Jul 15, 2024 | Corey G Lee | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422697

Document

Discover Bank -v- Homistek et al Print

Jul 26, 2023 | Corey G Lee | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2317087

Document

Bank Of America N.a. -v- Robledo Print

Jul 12, 2024 | Stephanie Thornton-Harris | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422569

Document

Capital One, N.A -v- Montemayor et al Print

Jul 26, 2023 | Garza, Thomas | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2317357

Document

OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print

Jul 12, 2024 | Charlie L Hill, Jr. | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited | CIVSB2422560

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.