Preview
’ x CM-010
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Iv, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY
LAW OFFICES OF PATENAUDE & FELIX, A.P.C. WV
Raymond A. Patenaude (#1 28855) / Stephanie J. Boone (#1 601 82)
Angie Hong Hoar (#212152) / Robert W. Wright (#276653) / Dean Keshavarz (# PL-496493)
9619 Chesapeake Drive, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92123 F i L ED
bUPERlOR COURT Gfi CALlfORNIA
TELEPHONE No.; (858) 244-7600 FAX No; (858) 836-0318 «tglINTY“Effiggifigfifigffiwro
ATTORNEY F0R(Name); PLAINTIFF
_,AN mm. .- 1
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO .- c
jUL ‘3 r1 2023
STREET ADDRESS: 247 WEST 3RD STREET
MAILING ADDRESS: 247 WEST 3RD STREET
CITY AND ZIP CODE: SAN BERNARDI'NO CA 9241541210
BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO IUSTICE CENTER gv U .
”'73""”"i-’-r .
»
“.dePF'JiTx. JW:
,,
--
CASE NAME: SYNCHRONY BANK DEBBIE TODD. .
vs.
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation CASE NMV SB 2 1 1 8 E
v u 1
,1
D (Amount
Unlimited E Limited
(Amount
D Counter D Joinder
JUDGE:
. ,
.
demanded demanded i5
Flled with first appearance by defendant DEPT,
pmapds manna) manna nr Ipee) (Cal. Rules 0f Court. rule 3.402)
Items 7-5 below must be completed (see instructions on page 2).
Check one box below for the case type that best describes this case:
Auto Tort Contract Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation
E Auto (22) D Breach of contract/warranty (06) gal. Rules of Court, rules 3.400-3.4o3)
Uninsured motorist (46) E Rule 3.740 collections (09) AntitrUSt/Trade reQUIation (03)
Other PI/PDNVD (Personal Injury/Property j Other collections (09) D C°n5tru°t'°n defeCt (10)
DamageIWrongful Death) Tort j Insurance coverage (18) D Masstort (40)
E Asbestos (o4)
j Other comma (37) D Securities litigation (28)
E Product liability (24)
Real Property
EnvironmentaI/Toxic tort (30)
E
. . .
Insurance coverage claims arlsmg from the
_ _
Medical malpractice (45)
Eminent domain/Inverse
tabove Listed provisionally complex case
E pI/pD/WD
Other (23) condemnation (14)
ypes( )
Non-PI/PD/wo (Other) Tort Wrongful eviction (33)
E Businesstort/unfair business practice (O7) Other real propeny (26) Enfoéc?ment
n orc emen
0ft‘lufqgg‘ent
gmen_( 20 )
E .
CIVII
. .
rlghts(08) Unlawful Detainer i
CW"
10'1”
00mph“
t
E Defamation (13) j Commercial (31) ““3332:
E F raUd (16) j .
ReSIdem'al (32)
.
a Other complaint (notspecified above) (42)
E Intellectual property (19) j Drugs (38) _
Miscellaneous
_ _
CIVII Petltlon
_ _
E .
Professnonal negllgence (25)
. _
Judlcm Rewew
_ _
Partner s Hp and corpor a t e governance (21)
E j Ass?
I
_
non PI/PD/WD
Other
Employment
_ tort (35)
j
forfe'ture (05)
Petltlon re: arbitration award (11)
B Other petition (notspec/fied above) (43)
Wrongful termination (36) Writ of mandate (02)
E Other employment (1 5) Other judicial review (39)
This case
judicial
is D g
is not complex under rule 3.400 ofthe
management:
California Rules of Court. lfthe case is complex, mark the factors requiring exceptional
a. Large number of separately represented parties d. Large number of witnesses
b. Extensive motion practice raising difficult or novel e. Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts
issues that will be time-consuming to resolve in other counties, states, or countries. or in a federal court
c. D Substantial amountofdocumemary evidence f.
D Substantial post-judgmentjudicialsupervision
3. Remedies sought (check all that apply): a. g monetary b. D non-monetary; declaratory or injunctive relief c. D punitive
4. Number ofcauses ofaction (specify): ONE
5.
6.
This case
lfthere are
g
D known
any
is is not a class action
related cases, file
suit.
and serve a notice of related case. (You may use form CM—015.)
Date: May 12, 2021
[ ]
RAYMOND A. PATENAUDE [ ]
STEPHANIE]. BOONE
ANGIE HONG HOAR ROBERTW WRIGHT
[ 1
7m DEAN KESHAVARZ
[ ]
>
(rYPE 0R PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE 0F PARTY 0R ATTORNEY FOR PARTY)
NOTICE
-
Plaintiffmust file this cover sheet with the first paper filed in the action or proceeding (except small claims cases or cases filed under the Probate
Code, Family Code, or Welfare and Institutions Code). (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.220.) Failure to file may result in sanctions.
' File this cover sheet in addition to any cover sheet required by local court rule.
' lfthis case is complex under rule 3.400 et seq. ofthe California Rules of Court, you must serve a copy of this cover sheet on all other parties to the
action or proceeding.
- Unless this is a collections case under rule 3.740 or a complex case, this cover sheet will be used for statistical purposes only.
Page 1 of 2
Cal. Rules of Court, rules 2.30, 3.220, 3400-3403, 3.740;
Form Adopted for
Judicial Council ofCalifornia
Mandatory Use
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Standards of Judicial Administration, std. 3.10
www.courtinfo.ca.gov
CM-010 [Rev. JuIy 1. 2007]
CA7 01M Civil Case Cover P&F File No. 21-12649
INSTRMIONS 0N HOW TO COMPLETE THE CMR SHEET
To Plaintiffs and Others Filing First Papers.
you are filing a first paper (for example, a complaint) in
If
file, along with your first paper, the
a civil case, you must complete and
Civil Case Cover Sheet contained on page
1. This information will be used to compile
types and numbers of cases filed. You must complet statistics about the
e items 1 through 6 on the sheet. ln item
that best describes the case Ifthe case 1, you must check one box for the case
fits both a general and a more
type
specific type of case listed in item
the case has multiple causes of action, check 1, check the more specific one. If
the box that best indicates the primary cause
of action. To assist you completing the
examples of the cases that belong under each case sheet,
type in item 1 are provided below‘ A cover sheet
paper. You do not need to submit a cover must be filed only with your initial
sheet with amended papers. Failure to file a
cover sheet with the first paper filed in a civil
may subject a party, its counsel, or both to sanctions under rules case
2.30 and 3.220 ofthe California Rules of Court
To Parties in Rule 3.740 Collection Cases. A "collection case'
Under rule 3740 is defined as an action for recover
sum stated to be certain that is not more than $25,000 exclusiv y of money owed in a
, e of interest and attorney‘s fees, arising from
services, or money was acquired on credit. a transaction in which property,
A collections case does not include an action seeking the following:
damages, (3) recovery of real property, (4) recovery of (1) tort damages, (2) punitive
personal property, or (5) a prejudgment writ of
as rule 3.740 collections case on this form means attachment. The identification of a case
that it will be exempt form the general time—for
management rules, unless a defendant files a responsive -service requirements and case
pleading. A rule 3.740 collections case will
service and obtaining a judgment in rule 3.740. be subject to the requirements for
To Parties in Complex Cases. In complex cases
only, parties must also use the Civil Case Cover
complex. lf a plaintiff believes the case
Sheet to designate whether the case is
is complex under rule 3.400 ofthe
California Rules of Court, this must be indicate
appropriate boxes in items 1 and 2. If a plaintiff d by completing the
designates a case as complex, the cover sheet
parties to the action. A defendant must be served with the compiaint on all
may file and serve no Iaterthan the time of its first appearance a joinder
in the plaintiff's designation, a
counter-designation thatthe case is not complex
, or, ifthe plaintiff has made no designation, a designat
ion thatthe case is complex.
CASE TYPES AND EXAMPLES
Auto Tort Contract
Auto (22)—Personal lnjury/Property Provisionally Complex Civil Litigation (Cal.
Breach of ContracWVarra nty (06) Rules of Court Rules 3.400-3.403)
Damage/Wrongful Death Breach of RentaI/Lease
Uninsured Motorist (46) (Ifthe Antitrust/Trade Regulation (03)
Comract (not unlawful detainer or Construction Defect
case involves an uninsured motorist (1 O)
wrongful eviction) Claims Involving Mass Ton (40)
claim subject to
Contract/Warranty Breach—Seller Securities Litigation (28)
arbitration, check this item fraud or negligence)
Plaintiff (not
EnvironmentaI/Toxic Tort (30)
instead ofAuto)
Negligent Breach of Contract/ Warranty
Insurance Coverage Claims
Other Pl/PD/WD (Personal lnjury/ Property Other Breach of Contract/Warranty
(arising from provisionally
DamageNVrongful Death) Collections (e.g., money owed, open book
complex case type listed above)
Tort accounts) (09)
(41 )
Asbestos (04) Collection Case—Seller Plaintiff
Asbestos Property Damage Other Promissory Note/Collecfions Enforcement of Judgment
Asbestos Personal Injury! Case Enforcement of Judgment (20)
Wrongful Death Insurance Coverage (notprov/siona/Iy Abstract of Judgment Out of
(
Product Liability (not asbestos or complex) (18) County)
toxic/environmental) (24) Auto Subrogation Confession ofJudgment (non-
Medical Malpractice (45) Other Coverage domestic relations)
Medical Malpractice— Other Contract (37) Sister State Judgment
Physicians & Surgeons Contractual Fraud Administrative Agency Award
Other Professional Health Care Other Contract Dispute (not unpaid taxes)
Malpractice Petition/Certification of Entry of
Real Property
Other Pl/PD/WD (23) Judgment on Unpaid Taxes
Eminent Domain/lnverse Condemnation
Premises Liability (e.g., slip
Other Enforcement of Judgment
(14)
and fall) Wrongful Eviction (33) Case
Intentional Bodily Injury/PDNVD Other Real Property (e.gfi quite title) (26) Miscellaneous Civil Complaint
(e.g., assault, vandalism) Writ of Possession of Real Property RICO (27)
Intentional Infliction of Mortgage Foreclosure Other Complaint (not specified
Emotional Distress Quite Title above) (42)
Negligent lnfliction of Other Real Property (noteminent Declaratory Relief Only
Emotional Distress domain, Iandlord/tenant, or foreclosure) |njunctive Relief Only (non—
Other PI/PDNVD
Unlawful Detainer harassment)
Non-Pl/PD/WD (Other) Tort Commercial (31) Mechanics Lien
Business Tort/Unfair Business O‘her Commercial Complaint
Residential (32)
Practice (non-tort/non-comp/ex)
Drugs (38) (if the case involves illegal
Civil Rights (e.g., discrimination, drugs, check this item; otherwise, report Miscellanem’s CiV" Petitm"
false arrest) (not civil as Commercial or Residential) Partnership and Corporate
harassment) (08)
Judicial Review Governance (21)
Defamation (e.g., slander, libel) Other Petition (notspecified above)
(13)
Asset Forfeiture (05)
Petition Re: Arbitration (43>
Fraud (16) Award (1 1)
Writ of Mandate
CivilHarassment
Intellectual Property (19) (O2)
Writ—Administrative
Workplace Violence
Professional Negligence (25) Mandamus
Elder/Dependent Adult
Legal Malpractice Writ—Mandamus on Limited Court
Case Matter Abuse
Other Professional Malpractice Election Contest
(non medical orlegal) Writ—Other Limited Court Case
Review
Petition for Name Change
Other Non-PI/PD/WD Tort (35)
Petition for Relieffrom Late
Other Judicial Review (39)
Employment Review of Health Officer Order Claim
Wrongful Termination (36) Other Civil Petition
Notice of Appeal—Labor
Other Employment (1 5) Commissioner Appeals
CM-O‘IO [Rev. January 1, 2007]
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Page 2 of 2
CA_01M Civil Case Cover
P&F File N0. 21-12649
Related Content
in San Bernardino County
Case
Print
Jul 15, 2024 |
Wilfred J Schneider, Jr.
|
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422674
Case
Capital One N.a. -v- Verdin Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
. TBD |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422834
Case
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560
Ruling
Synchrony Bank vs Dianna Rodriguez
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CV-03604
23CV-03604 Synchrony Bank v. Dianna Rodriguez
Motion for Order that Requests for Admission be deemed admitted
Appearance required. Parties who wish to appear remotely must contact the clerk of the
court at (209) 725-4111 to seek permission and arrange for a remote appearance.
Ruling
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
Aug 05, 2024 |
S-CV-0051944
S-CV-0051944 JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. vs. Tucker, Deram K
** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouraged
Appearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading,
default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Tucker, Deram K
Additionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Tucker,
Deram K
Ruling
PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC VS. CHRISTINA RANGEL ET AL
Jul 23, 2024 |
CGC17559532
Matter on the Law & Motion calendar for Tuesday, July 23, 2024, Line 1. PLAINTIFF PMIG FINANCIAL, LLC's HEARING ON CLAIM OF EXEMPTION. Continued to August 6, 2024 on the court's motion. =(302/CK)
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs CERVANTES
Jul 27, 2024 |
Frank Anthony Moschetti |
CVCO2300997
DISCOVER BANK VS MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
CVCO2300997
CERVANTES FOR CAROLINA CERVANTES
Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling will be issued.
Ruling
DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL
Jul 25, 2024 |
CV-23-006622
CV-23-006622 – DISCOVER BANK vs FERNANDEZ, MANUEL – Plaintiff Discover Bank’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings – GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND, and unopposed.
The Court GRANTS the request to take judicial notice of the answer and complaint filed in this case. The answer admits all allegations in the complaint as true and does not assert any affirmative defenses.
Based on the pleadings, the Court finds that the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute causes of action against the defendant, and the answer does not state facts sufficient to constitute a defense to the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 438(c)(1)(A).) Defendant, who did not oppose this motion, has not given the Court any reason to grant leave to amend. (Cf. Today's IV, Inc. v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (2022) 83 Cal.App.5th 1137, 1176, reh'g denied (Oct. 25, 2022), review denied (Jan. 18, 2023).)
Consequently, the unopposed motion is GRANTED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Court will sign the proposed order and the proposed judgment submitted by Plaintiff. Court trial date to be vacated.
Due to the interruption of telephone service as a result of an outage, any party requesting a hearing must make the request via email to the court clerk. If V-Court is not available and an in-person appearance is not possible, appearance must be via Zoom. Sign-up information for Zoom will be available on the court’s website.
Ruling
Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc., vs. Castro
Jul 24, 2024 |
23CVG-00362
CREDITORS ADJUSTMENT BUREAU, INC., VS. CASTRO
Case Number: 23CVG-00362
Tentative Ruling on Motion for Terminating Sanctions: Plaintiff Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. moves
for terminating sanctions by striking Defendant Vincent Castro’s answer. Plaintiff also requests sanctions in the
amount of $1,572.75 for each motion.
Procedural Defect: As a procedural matter, this motion was served both via mail and email on May 9, 2024, and
set for a hearing date of June 7, 2024. CCP § 1005(b) requires all moving papers be served 16 court days before
the hearing. This notice period is extended by five calendar days if the motion is served by mail. Id. For service
by email, the notice period is extended by two court days. CCP § 1010.6(a)(3). This timeframe is calculated by
counting backwards from the hearing date but excluding the hearing date. CCP § 12c.
Starting with the June 7, 2024, hearing date and counting backwards 16 court days (excluding the Court holiday
of May 27, 2024) then five calendar days for out of state mailing this matter should have been served by mail no
later than, May 4, 2024. For email the last day to serve the motion was April 24, 2024. The motion was served
on May 7, 2024, and was untimely under either calculation. Based on insufficient statutory notice, the motion is
denied.
Merits of Motion: Even if the motion had been timely noticed, terminating sanctions are not warranted.
Terminating sanctions are a “drastic penalty and should be used sparingly.” Lopez v. Watchtower Bible & Tract
Society of New York, Inc. (2016) 246 Cal.App.4th 566, 604. A terminating sanction should not generally be
imposed by the court until less severe sanctions have been attempted and were unsuccessful. Id. No justification
has been provided as to why terminating sanctions are appropriate in this context instead of lesser evidentiary or
issue sanctions. Without additional evidence, terminating sanctions would be premature.
The motion is DENIED. A proposed order was lodged with the Court which will be modified to reflect the
denial.
Review Hearing: This matter is also on calendar for review regarding trial re-setting. The Court designates this
matter as a Plan II case and intends on setting it for trial no later than October 15, 2024. An appearance is
necessary on today’s calendar to discuss available trial dates.
Ruling
Value Recovery Group. L.P. vs. Sidebar Legal, PC, et al.
Jul 27, 2024 |
23CV-0201860
ET AL.
Case Number: 23CV-0201860
Tentative Ruling on Order to Show Cause Re Dismissal: An Order to Show Cause Re:
Dismissal (“OSC”) issued on June 24, 2024, pursuant to Gov’t Code § 68608(b) to Plaintiff and
Plaintiff’s Counsel for failure to appear at the June 17, 2024, hearing as ordered on February 20,
2024. No response to the OSC has been filed. The Court previously sanctioned Plaintiff and
Counsel for failure to timely serve the parties. The parties have not been served. The sanctions
have not been paid. It appears Plaintiff has abandoned this action and lesser sanctions would not
be effective. The Court DISMISSES this action. The clerk is instructed to prepare a separate
Order of Dismissal. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
******************************************************************************
9:00 a.m. Review Hearings
******************************************************************************
Ruling
Sierra Central Credit Union vs. Goodwin
Jul 23, 2024 |
23CVG-00253
SIERRA CENTRAL CREDIT UNION VS. GOODWIN
Case Number: 23CVG-00253
This matter is on calendar for review regarding status of bankruptcy. Plaintiff filed a Case Management Statement
informing the Court that the stay is still in effect. The matter is continued to Tuesday, January 23, 2025 at 9:00
a.m. in Department 63 for status of bankruptcy. No appearance is necessary on today’s calendar.
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Martinez Print
Jul 16, 2024 |
Tanada, Stephanie |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422781
Document
Bank Of America N.a. -v- Robledo Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Stephanie Thornton-Harris |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422569
Document
OPORTUN, INC -v- Campos Gonzalez Print
Jul 12, 2024 |
Charlie L Hill, Jr. |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
Rule 3.740 Collections $10,000 or Less Limited |
CIVSB2422560