arrow left
arrow right
  • Dino Bonavita v. Syed Mujahid Sayeed Md, Precision Surgery Of New York, Pc, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice document preview
  • Dino Bonavita v. Syed Mujahid Sayeed Md, Precision Surgery Of New York, Pc, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice document preview
  • Dino Bonavita v. Syed Mujahid Sayeed Md, Precision Surgery Of New York, Pc, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice document preview
  • Dino Bonavita v. Syed Mujahid Sayeed Md, Precision Surgery Of New York, Pc, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice document preview
  • Dino Bonavita v. Syed Mujahid Sayeed Md, Precision Surgery Of New York, Pc, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice document preview
  • Dino Bonavita v. Syed Mujahid Sayeed Md, Precision Surgery Of New York, Pc, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health Torts - Medical, Dental, or Podiatrist Malpractice document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2019 11:37 AM INDEX NO. 611506/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2019 SHORT FORM ORDER r ORIGINAL' SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK Present: ANTONIO I. BRANDVEEN J. S. C. DINO BONAVITA, TRIAL / IAS PART 25 NASSAU COUNTY Plaintiff, - against - Index No. 611506/18 SYED MUJAHID SAYEED, M.D., PRECISION SURGERY OF NEW YORK, P.C., NORTH Motion Sequence No. 001 SHORE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and NORTH WELL HEALTH, Defendants. The following papers having been read on this motion: Notice of Motion, Affidavits, & Exhibits 1 Answering Affidavits Replying Affidavits Briefs: Plaintiff's / Petitioner's Defendant's / Respondent's UPON DUE DELIBERATION AND CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT of the foregoing papers, including a sworn supporting statement, supporting documents (Exhibit A-D), including but not limited to the pleadings and a verified bill of particulars, photos, authorizations, and a notice of medical malpractice, this motion is decided as follows: The plaintiff moves, without opposition, for an order pursuant to CPLR §§ 2004 and 3406(a) granting the plaintiff an extension of time to file a notice of medical 1 of 3 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2019 11:37 AM INDEX NO. 611506/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2019 malpractice nunc pro tune, and deeming the notice of medical malpractice, as attached to the moving papers, as timely filed and timely served upon defendants, with the electronic filing service of this motion. There is no opposition to this motion. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for the pain and suffering due to the medical malpractice and negligence by the defendants on or about July 21, 2017, through October 31, 2017. In support of this motion, the plaintiff's attorney states, in an affirmation, that due to clerical oversight, the notice of medical malpractice was not timely filed, and attaches the notice of medical malpractice along with copies of the pleadings, a verified bill of particulars and proof of service of the response to the defendant's discovery demands with the necessary medical authorizations to the moving papers. CPLR 3406(a) provides that the plaintiff must file with the court a notice of medical malpractice action not more than 60 days after issue is joined. The notice should therefore have been filed in the instant case no later than January 21, 1989. Pursuant to a motion under CPLR 2004, however, the court may, in its discretion, extend a plaintiffs time to file such a notice, and the plaintiff need not demonstrate a meritorious 'claim or a reasonable, . excuse for the delay in order for the motion to be granted (see, Tewari v. Tsoutsouras, 75 N.Y.2d 1, 550 N.Y.S.2d 572, 549 N.E.2d 1143) Casiano v New York Hosp.-Cornell Med. Or., 169 AD2d 806, 807 [2d Dept 1991]. The Court finds that the defendants have not shown substantial prejudice to them in granting the plaintiff the relief sought (Mullen v Flushing Hosp., 161 AD2d 748, 749 [2d Dept 1990]). Here, the delay was short, and the defendants do not indicate any hindrance in preparation of the matter or anything prevented them from taking some Page 2 of 3 2 of 3 FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 05/01/2019 11:37 AM INDEX NO. 611506/2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/01/2019 measure in support of their positions regarding this litigation (see Cherebin v Empress Ambulance Serv., Inc., 43 AD3d 364 [1st Dept 2007]; see also Nardi v County of Nassau, 18 AD3d 520 [2d Dept 2005]). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the plaintiffs motion for an order giving the plaintiff an extension of time to file a notice of medical malpractice nunc pro tunc, and deeming the notice of medical malpractice, as attached to the moving papers, as timely filed and timely served upon defendants with the electronic filing of this order, is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the defendants within 30 days of the date of this order The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of the Court. Dated: April 23, 2019 ENTER: J. S. C. HON. ANTONIO I. BRANDVEEN NON FINAL DISPOSITION J.S.C. r ORIGINA121 ENTERED MAY 0 1 2019 NASSAU COUNTY COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE Page 3 of 3 3 of 3