arrow left
arrow right
  • Michael Knopf, Norma Knopf v. Frank M. Esposito, Dorsey & Whitney, Llp, Nathaniel H. Akerman, Edward S. Feldman Torts - Other (Fraud;Judiciary L. 487) document preview
  • Michael Knopf, Norma Knopf v. Frank M. Esposito, Dorsey & Whitney, Llp, Nathaniel H. Akerman, Edward S. Feldman Torts - Other (Fraud;Judiciary L. 487) document preview
  • Michael Knopf, Norma Knopf v. Frank M. Esposito, Dorsey & Whitney, Llp, Nathaniel H. Akerman, Edward S. Feldman Torts - Other (Fraud;Judiciary L. 487) document preview
  • Michael Knopf, Norma Knopf v. Frank M. Esposito, Dorsey & Whitney, Llp, Nathaniel H. Akerman, Edward S. Feldman Torts - Other (Fraud;Judiciary L. 487) document preview
						
                                

Preview

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2021 11:51 AM INDEX NO. 150315/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 512 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2021 EXHIBIT 21 Gmail - as i was trying FILED: NEWto say YORK5519(c)COUNTY CLERK 08/27/2021 11:51 AMhttps://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=13960a2a7d&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a%... INDEX NO. 150315/2019 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 512 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/27/2021 Eric Berry as i was trying to say 5519(c) 1 message Eric Berry Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 6:17 PM To: "Spiro, Edward" , "Frank M. Esposito" , "Edward Feldman, Esq." , Gary Greenberg , "Michael Z. Brownstein" is repeatedly held to be coextensive with 5519(a), 1st Dept. came on board in Tax Equity case. So a stay is only effective against the executory aspects of any order or judgment, not the so-called sequelae (i.e., obligation to answer, provide discovery, go to trial) that is the natural -- not a decreed -- consequence of the order that is appealed from) see attached so, like i said over the phone, we are not seeking to enforce anything and you are not entitled to a stay any way cannot go to court Friday or Monday Eric W. Berry Berry Law PLLC 745 Fifth Avenue, 5th Floor New York, New York 10151 +1.212.355.0777 office +1.917.940.3200 mobile +1.212.750.1371 facsimile website https://www.berrylawnewyork.com This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This communication may contain material protected by the attorney-client privilege. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this e-mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender immediately 8 attachments Baker v Board of Educ of West Irondequoit School Dist.pdf 126K Shorten v City of White Plains.pdf 126K Schwartz v New York City Housing Authority-1.pdf 141K Ocasio ex rel Perez v City of New York.pdf 155K Pokoik v Department of Health Services of County of Suffolk.pdf 165K Walker v Delaware And Hudson R Co Inc-1.pdf 124K Young by Young on Behalf of Estate of Young v State.pdf 117K Tax Equity Now NY LLC v City of New York.pdf 152K 1 of 1 8/26/2021, 11:25 PM