arrow left
arrow right
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
  • Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al(36) Unlimited Wrongful Termination document preview
						
                                

Preview

Superior Court of California, County of Butte Minute Order Randolph, Teresa vs Trustees of the California State University et al 19CV01226 Hearing Type: Motion hearings - Predispo Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint Hearing Date: February 24, 2021 at 9:00 AM Location: NC-2; Department 6 - Stephen E. Benson Heard by: Hon. Stephen E. Benson, Judge Courtroom Clerk: Crystal Tilton Court Reporter: N/A Court Interpreter: N/A Appearances: Cynthia Daley, Defendant, not present Jerry Deschler, Attorney General, present via CourtCall Debra Larson, Defendant, not present Jerry Deschler, Attorney General, present State of California, Defendant, not present Jerry Deschler, Attorney General, present Trustees of the California State University, Defendant, Jerry Deschler, Attorney General, present not present Teresa Randolph, Plaintiff, not present Thomas Dimitre, Attorney, present via CourtCall Proceedings: - The Court indicates the nature of the proceedings. Parties submit on the matter. The tentative ruling is adopted, as follows: Pursuant to Butte County Superior Court Local Rule 3.11(b), the Court refuses to consider the Plaintiff's untimely opposition. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted in part and denied in part. As to the eighth cause of action (Wrongful Termination/Constructive Discharge/Retaliation in Violation of Statute), the motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted without leave to amend on the grounds that Government Code section 815 bars common law Tameny claims and the Third Amended Complaint does not set forth any independent basis to bring such common law claims. As to the eleventh cause of action (Defamation), the Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied the Government Tort Claims Act and that the facts in the claims form coincide with the allegations in the complaint. However, Plaintiff has failed to cure the pleading deficiencies with regard to her claim against Defendant Larson, and as to Defendant Larson, the motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted without leave to amend. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Defendants shall submit a form of Order consistent with this ruling. 19CV01226 Minute Order Page 1 of 1