On November 26, 2019 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Runyon, Nathan Peter,
and
Does 1-50, Inclusive,
Ng, Kaiser,
Payward, Inc., A California Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4514
NATHAN PETER RUNYON Case Management Department 610
Case Management Order
PLAINTIFF (S)
VS. NO.: CGC-19-581099
PAYWARD, INC., A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION et al Order to Show Cause RE
Dismissal (CRC 3.1385)
DEFENDANT (S)
TO: ALL COUNSEL AND SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS
The court has been notified that this case has settled.
Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1385 the court will dismiss this case unless good cause is
shown as to why it should not be dismissed.
A California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1385 dismissal hearing is hereby set for Nov-16-2021 at 10:30 am in
Department 610, CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE.
If counsel or self-represented litigant has no objection to the case being dismissed by the court, no
appearance is required.
You may call (415) 551-4000 after 12:00 noon the day before the hearing to determine whether the filing
of a dismissal or judgment has taken the order to show cause off calendar.
***Due to the ongoing Pandemic, the Court is currently allowing appearance by telephone for an OSC
hearing. Appearance by telephone for an OSC will be consistent with Local Rule 3.2E, the rule that
governs telephonic appearance for an objection hearing. ***
DATED: SEP-07-2021 SAMUEL K. FENG
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Order to Show Cause RE Dismissal (CRC 3.1385)
Form 000001
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL
I, the undersigned, certify that I am an employee of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco and not a party to
the above-entitled cause and that on SEP-07-2021 I served the attached Order to Show Cause RE Dismissal (CRC 3.1385) by
placing a copy thereof in an envelope addressed to all parties to this action as listed below.
I then placed the envelope in the
outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, sealing of the
envelope, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date, following standard court practice.
Dated : SEP-07-2021 By: ROCHELLE VELUZ
CLAIRE E. COCHRAN (222529)
LAW OFFICES OF CLAIRE COCHRAN
100 PINE STREET, SUITE 1250
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111
BRENDAN M. FORD (224333)
FORD & DIULIO PC
650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, STE 760
COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626
ANDREW E. CALDERON (316673)
PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT LLP
355 SOUTH GRAND AVE
44TH FLR
LOS ANGELES, CA 90071
CHRISTOPHER N. LAVIGNE (X03682)
PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT LLP
277 PARK AVENUE, 45TH FLOOR
NEW YORK, NY 10172
GREGORY W. STEVENS (X04040)
2825 EAST COTTONWOOD PARKWAY
SUITE 500
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84121-7060
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL
Page 1 of 1 Form 000001
Document Filed Date
September 07, 2021
Case Filing Date
November 26, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 400 MCALLISTER STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102-4514 NATHAN PETER RUNYON Case Management Department 610 Case Management Order PLAINTIFF (S) VS. NO.: CGC-19-581099 PAYWARD, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION et al Order to Show Cause RE Dismissal (CRC 3.1385) DEFENDANT (S) TO: ALL COUNSEL AND SELF-REPRESENTED LITIGANTS The court has been notified that this case has settled. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1385 the court will dismiss this case unless good cause is shown as to why it should not be dismissed. A California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1385 dismissal hearing is hereby set for Nov-16-2021 at 10:30 am in Department 610, CIVIC CENTER COURTHOUSE. If counsel or self-represented litigant has no objection to the case being dismissed by the court, no appearance is required. You may call (415) 551-4000 after 12:00 noon the day before the hearing to determine whether the filing of a dismissal or judgment has taken the order to show cause off calendar. ***Due to the ongoing Pandemic, the Court is currently allowing appearance by telephone for an OSC hearing. Appearance by telephone for an OSC will be consistent with Local Rule 3.2E, the rule that governs telephonic appearance for an objection hearing. *** DATED: SEP-07-2021 SAMUEL K. FENG JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Order to Show Cause RE Dismissal (CRC 3.1385) Form 000001 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL I, the undersigned, certify that I am an employee of the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco and not a party to the above-entitled cause and that on SEP-07-2021 I served the attached Order to Show Cause RE Dismissal (CRC 3.1385) by placing a copy thereof in an envelope addressed to all parties to this action as listed below. I then placed the envelope in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA 94102, on the date indicated above for collection, sealing of the envelope, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date, following standard court practice. Dated : SEP-07-2021 By: ROCHELLE VELUZ CLAIRE E. COCHRAN (222529) LAW OFFICES OF CLAIRE COCHRAN 100 PINE STREET, SUITE 1250 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 BRENDAN M. FORD (224333) FORD & DIULIO PC 650 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, STE 760 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 ANDREW E. CALDERON (316673) PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT LLP 355 SOUTH GRAND AVE 44TH FLR LOS ANGELES, CA 90071 CHRISTOPHER N. LAVIGNE (X03682) PIERCE BAINBRIDGE BECK PRICE & HECHT LLP 277 PARK AVENUE, 45TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10172 GREGORY W. STEVENS (X04040) 2825 EAST COTTONWOOD PARKWAY SUITE 500 SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84121-7060 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL Page 1 of 1 Form 000001