arrow left
arrow right
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
  • Javaheri VS Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Civil Unlimited (Fraud (no contract)) document preview
						
                                

Preview

wn eM $$ Tres € FILED ALAMEDA COUNTY DEC 10 2010 CLE By IA, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA RISDICTION SASE# VG10534162 ANSWER TO CROSS-COMPLAINT IF WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. ASSIGNED FOR ALL PURPOSES TO NUDGE GEORGE C. HERNANDEZ JEPARTMENT 607 Somplaint Filed: AUGUST 31, 2010 L Javaheri v. Wells Fargo Case# VG10534162 8 TERI and EXPRESS REALTY for itself and no f WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. ‘and specifically each and every material yplainant and particularly deny om they engaged ebted to Cross-complainant in any sum ‘endants allege: ATIVE DEFENSE | cause of action therein, fails to state facts his answering Cross-defendants. and on such information and belief alleges that, iy, has been substantially and/or partially \FFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 7e and thereon allege that, the contract in 1 Cross-complainant is barred from recovery on m of said modification. Javaheri v. Wells Fargo Case# VG10534162 & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE ve and thereon allege that, if there presently aims, or obligations which Cross-complainant iid rights, claims, or obligations are 2 parties. A J. JAVAHERI and EXPRESS REALTY pray yllows: »ss-complainant and in favor of Plaintiff and XESS REALTY and Cross-complainant take ALI J. JAVAHERI and EXPRESS REALTY ts, ALI J. JAVAHERI and EXPRESS REALTY Court may deem just and proper. Defendants Ali J. Javaheri and Express Realty Javaheri v. Wells Fargo Case# VG10534162 + RVI E Alameda County Case# VG10534162 at of the United States; employed in the city of San aton, County of Alameda, State of California; over case; and my business address is 99 North First | Stoneridge Mall road, Suite 201 Pleasanton, CA erved the within document(s), S FARGO csimile machine telephone number (408) 465-5361, ocument(s) on the parties in said action by ibers as set forth above on this date before 5:00 P.M. 3 practice for the collection and processing of States Postal Service and that each day’s mail is ice that same day in the ordinary course of business. ementioned document(s) on the parties in said action sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, ving ordinary business practices, at Pleasanton, gatrue copy thereof to the office of the aws of the State of California that the above is true t Pleasanton, California. Debra in rvice