On July 14, 2021 a
Party Notice
was filed
involving a dispute between
Prince, Stephan Thaddeus,
Stephan Thaddeus Prince,
and
Malhi, Manny,
Malhi, Surjit,
Malhi, Tao,
Manny Malhi,
R Millennium Transport Inc,
Surjit Malhi,
Tao Malhi,
for Other Employment: Unlimited
in the District Court of Stanislaus County.
Preview
ATTORNEY 0R PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NAM E, ADDRESS, PHONE, BAR NUMBER) FOR COURT USE ONLY
COURT GENERATED FE‘LEEI
Attorney for:
JUL 1 t1 202i
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF STANISLAUS
CLERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
Street Address: City Towers Bldg, 80| |0th St, 4‘" Floor, Modesto, CA 95354
COUNTY OF STANlSLAUS
Civil Clerk’s Ollicc: 80| l0”‘ Street, 4‘“ Floor, Modesto, CA 95354
8Y
Plaintiff/Petitioner: STEPHEN TIIADDEUS PRINCE PUTY
Defendant/Respondentz R MILLENNIUM TRANSPORT INC
NOTICE OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE CASE Numsa CV-21-003654
1. NOTICE isgiven that a Case Management Conference has been scheduled as follows:
Date: ll-15-2l Time: 9:00 AM
This case is assigned to Judge JOHN FREELAND , Dept 23 , for all purposes, including
trial.
*Departments 21 & 22 are located at 801 lO‘h Street, 6lh Floor, Modesto, CA 95354
*Departments 23 & 24 are located at 801 10lh Street, 4‘h Floor, Modesto, CA 95354
All filings shall
be filed in the Clerk’s Office at the City Towers, 4'h Floor address.
You have 30 calendar days to file a written response with this court after the legal papers and the summons
were served on you. You must also serve a copy of your written response on the plaintiff.
2. You must file and serve completed Case Management Conference Statement at least fifteen (15) calendari
a
days before the case management conference.
3. You must be familiar with the case and be fully prepared to participate effectively in the case management
conference.
4. At the case management conference the Court may make pretrial orders, including the following:
a. An order establishing a discovery schedule.
b. An order referring the case to arbitration.
c. An order dismissing liclitious defendants.
d. An order scheduling exchange
ofexpett \vitness information.
e. An order setting subsequent conferences and the trial date.
f. Other orders to achieve the goals ol‘the Trial Court Delay Reduction Act (Gov. Code, § 68600 et seq.).
DatesjUL
Mandatory Form
i A 202‘
b/W/
/DWW——— --SA1\'C l IONS--
Deputy Clerk
lfyou do not file the Case tl/lanagemen/ Stale/Hen! required by local rule, or attend the case
management conference or participate effectively in the conference, the court may impose
CV003 sanctions (including dismissal ofthe case, striking ofthe answer, and payment of money). I ”I 0
Rule 3.110 of the California Rules of Court.
Time fér Service of Complaint, Cross-Complaint, and Response
(a) [+\ppliéalion] This rule applies Io the service of pleadings in civil cases except for collection cases under Rule
3.740 (a), Unlawful detainer actions, proceedings, under the Family Code, and other proceedings for which
different service requirements are prescribed by law.
(b) [Serviceof complaint] The complaint must be served on all named defendants and proofs of service on those
defendants must be filed with the court within 60 days after the filing of the complaint. When the complaint is
amended to add a defendant, the added defendant must be served and proof of service must be filed within 30
days after the filing ofthe amended complaint. I
(C) [Service of cross-complaint] A cross-complaint against a party who has appeared in the action must be
accompanied by proof of service of the cross-complaint at the time it is filed. lfthe cross-complaint adds new
parties, the cross-complaint must be served on all parties and proofs of service on the new parties must be filed
within 30 days ofthe filing ofthe cross-complaint.
(d) [Timing ofresponsive pleadings] The parties may stipulate without leave ofcourt to one 15-day extension beyond
the 30-day time period prescribed for the response after service ofthe initial complaint.
(e) [Modification oftiming: application for order extending time] The court, on its own motion or on the application
ofa party, may extend or otherwise modify the times provided in (b) - (d). An application .for a court order
extending the time to serve a pleading must be filed before the time for service has elapsed. The application must
be accompanied by a declaration showing \vhy service has not been completed, documeniing the efforts that have
been made to complete service, and specifying the date by which service is proposed to be completed.
(0 [Failure to serve] lfa party fails to serve and file pleadings as required under this rule, and has not obtained an
order extending time to serve its pleadings, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why sanctions shall not
be imposed.
(g) [Request for entry of default] lfa responsive pleading is not served within the time limits specified in this rule
and no extension of time has been granted, the plaintiff must file a request for entry of default within lO days
after the time for service has elapsed. The court may issue an Order to Show Cause \vhy sanctions should not be
imposed ifthe plaintiff fails to timely file the request for the entry ofdefault‘
(h) [Dcfaultjudgment] When default is entered, the party who requested the entry ofdefault must obtain a default
a
judgment against the defaulting party within 45 days after the default was entered, unless the court has granted
an extension oftime. The court may issue an Order to Show Cause why sanctions should not be imposed if that
party fails to obtain entry ofjudgment against a defaulting party or to request an extension oftime to apply for a
delaultjudgment within that time.
(t [Order to Show Cause] Responsive papers to an Order to Show Cause issued under this rule must be filed and
served at least 5 calendar days before the hearing.
CVOO3 ll/IO
Document Filed Date
July 14, 2021
Case Filing Date
July 14, 2021
Category
Other Employment: Unlimited
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.