Legal Document: 21-CIV-04612

On February 17, 2022 a 53647CaseM00ce4a was filed involving a dispute between and in the District Court of Sonoma County.

Preview
CM-110
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY

Candice Hamant 184016 Darrell Nguyen 228959
Tyson & Mendes, LLP
371 Bel Marin Keys Blvd., Suite 100
Novato, CA 94949
TELEPHONE NO.: (628) 253-5070 FAX NO.(Optional): (415)785-3165
Chamant@tysonmendes.com
E-MAIL ADDRESS:

ATTORNEY FOR (Name): Defendants

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF San Mateo County
STREET ADDRESS: 500 County Center
MAILING ADDRESS:

CITY AND ZIP CODE:Redwood City, California 94063
BRANCH NAME:

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NAHID BOLGHAND AND ANDREW BOLGHAND

DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DAVID ANTHONY MARINO, REAL PROPERTY SALES,

CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CASE NUMBER:

(Check one): X UNLIMITED CASE  LIMITED CASE 21-CIV-04612
(Amount demanded (Amount demanded is $25,000
exceeds $25,000) or less)
A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows:
Date: March 3, 2022 Time: 9:00 a.m. Dept.: 21 Div.: Room:
Address of court (if different from the address above):

X Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Darrell Nguyen
INSTRUCTIONS: All applicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided.

1. Party or parties (answer one):
a. X This statement is submitted by party (name): DAVID ANTHONY MARINO and REAL PROPERTY SALES, INC.
b.  This statement is submitted jointlyby parties (names):

2. Complaint and cross-complaint (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a. The complaint was filed on (date):
b.  The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date):
3. Service (to be answered by plaintiffs and cross-complainants only)
a.  All parties named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared, or have been dismissed.
b.  The following parties named in the complaint or cross-complaint
(1)  have not been served (specify names and explain why not):
(2)  have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names):
(3)  have had a default entered against them (specify names):
c. X The following additional parties may be added (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which
they may be served):
The Laurence A. Gavin Recovable Trust

4. Description of case
a. Type of case in X complaint  cross-complaint (Describe, including causes of action):
Complaint for intentional misrepresentation, negligent
misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, and
declaratory relief
Page 1 of 5

Form Adopted for Mandatory Use CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Cal. Rules of Court,
Judicial Council of California rules 3.720–3.730
CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] www.courts.ca.gov

21-1077 Bolghand
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NAHID BOLGHAND AND ANDREW BOLGHAND CASE NUMBER:

21-CIV-04612
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DAVID ANTHONY MARINO, REAL PROPERTY SALES,

4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case, including any damages. (If personal injury damages are sought, specify the injury and
damages claimed, including medical expenses to date [indicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost
earnings to date, and estimated future lost earnings. If equitable relief is sought, describe the nature of the relief.)
Real estate transaction dispute between plaintiffs and their dual
agent real agent involving the sale of a 4 unit apartment building.
Plainitffs are claiming damages for alleged nondisclosure.

 (If more space is needed, check this box and attach a page designated as Attachment 4b.)
5. Jury or nonjury trial
The party or parties request X a jury trial  a nonjury trial. (If more than one party, provide the name of each party
requesting a jury trial):

6. Trial date
a.  The trial has been set for (date):
b. X No trial date has been set. This case will be ready for trial within 12 months of the date of the filing of the complaint (if
not, explain):

c. Dates on which parties or attorneys will not be available for trial (specify dates and explain reasons for unavailability):

7. Estimated length of trial
The party or parties estimate that the trial will take (check one):
a. X days (specify number): 7 - 9 court days
b.  hours (short causes) (specify):
8. Trial representation (to be answered for each party)
The party or parties will be represented at trial X by the attorney or party listed in the caption  by the following:
a. Attorney:
b. Firm:
c. Address:
d. Telephone number: f. Fax number:
e. E-mail address: g. Party represented:
 Additional representation is described in Attachment 8.
9. Preference
 This case is entitled to preference (specify code section):
10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
a. ADR information package. Please note that different ADR processes are available in different courts and communities; read
the ADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 of the California Rules of Court for information about the
processes available through the court and community programs in this case.
(1) For parties represented by counsel: Counsel X has  has not provided the ADR information package identified
in rule 3.221 to the client and reviewed ADR options with the client.
(2) For self-represented parties: Party  has  has not reviewed the ADR information package identified in rule 3.221.
b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation (if available).
(1)  This matter is subject to mandatory judicial arbitration under Code of Civil Procedure section 1141.11 or to civil action
mediation under of Code of Civil Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount in controversy does not exceed the
statutory limit.
(2)  Plaintiff elects to refer this case to judicial arbitration and agrees to limit recovery to the amount specified in Code of
Civil Procedure section 1141.11.
(3) X This case is exempt from judicial arbitration under rule 3.811 of the California Rules of Court or from civil action
mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption):

CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 2 of 5

21-1077 Bolghand
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NAHID BOLGHAND AND ANDREW BOLGHAND CASE NUMBER:

21-CIV-04612
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DAVID ANTHONY MARINO, REAL PROPERTY SALES,

10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties are willing to participate in, have agreed to participate in, or
have already participated in (check all that apply and provide the specified information):

The party or parties completing If the party or parties completing this form in the case have agreed to
this form are willing to participate in or have already completed an ADR process or processes,
participate in the following ADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties' ADR
processes (check all that apply): stipulation):

X Mediation session not yet scheduled

(1) Mediation X  Mediation session scheduled for (date):
 Agreed to complete mediation by (date):
 Mediation completed on (date):

X Settlement conference not yet scheduled

(2) Settlement
  Settlement conference scheduled for (date):
conference
 Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date):
 Settlement conference completed on (date):

 Neutral evaluation not yet scheduled
(3) Neutral evaluation   Neutral evaluation scheduled for (date):
 Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date):
 Neutral evaluation completed on (date):

 Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled
(4) Nonbinding judicial   Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration
 Agreed to complete judicial arbitration by (date):
 Judicial arbitration completed on (date):

 Private arbitration not yet scheduled
(5) Binding private   Private arbitration scheduled for (date):
arbitration
 Agreed to complete private arbitration by (date):
 Private arbitration completed on (date):

 ADR session not yet scheduled
(6) Other (specify):   ADR session scheduled for (date):
 Agreed to complete ADR session by (date):
 ADR completed on (date):

CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 3 of 5

21-1077 Bolghand
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NAHID BOLGHAND AND ANDREW BOLGHAND CASE NUMBER:

21-CIV-04612
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DAVID ANTHONY MARINO, REAL PROPERTY SALES, I

11. Insurance
a. X The
Insurance carrier, if any, for party filing this statement (name): Hartford
b. Reservation of rights: X Yes  No
c.  Coverage issues will significantly affect resolution of this case (explain):

12. Jurisdiction
Indicate any matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status.
 Bankruptcy  Other (specify):
Status:

13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination
a.  There are companion, underlying, or related cases.
(1) Name of case:
(2) Name of court:
(3) Case number:
(4) Status:
 Additional cases are described in Attachment 13a.
b.  A motion to  consolidate  coordinate will be filed by (name party):

14. Bifurcation
 The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing, or coordinating the following issues or causes of
action (specify moving party, type of motion, and reasons):

15. Other motions
 The party or parties expect to file the following motions before trial (specify moving party, type of motion, and issues):

16. Discovery
a.  The party or parties have completed all discovery.
b. X The following discovery will be completed by the date specified (describe all anticipated discovery):
Party Description Date
Defendants written discovery Per Code
Defendants Party depositions Per Code
Defendants Non-party depositions Per Code
Defendants Expert depositions Per Code

c.  The following discovery issues, including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are
anticipated (specify):

CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 4 of 5

21-1077 Bolghand
CM-110
PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: NAHID BOLGHAND AND ANDREW BOLGHAND CASE NUMBER:

21-CIV-04612
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DAVID ANTHONY MARINO, REAL PROPERTY SALES,

17. Economic litigation
a.  This is a limited civil case (i.e., the amount demanded is $25,000 or less) and the economic litigation procedures in Code
of Civil Procedure sections 90-98 will apply to this case.
b.  This is a limited civil case and a motion to withdraw the case from the economic litigation procedures or for additional
discovery will be filed (if checked, explain specifically why economic litigation procedures relating to discovery or trial
should not apply to this case):

18. Other issues
 The party or parties request that the following additional matters be considered or determined at the case management
conference (specify):

19. Meet and confer
a.  The party or parties have met and conferred with all parties on all subjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of
Court (if not, explain):

b. X After meeting and conferring as required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court, the parties agree on the following
(specify): Defendants are agreeable to mediation.

20. Total number of pages attached (if any): 1
I am completely familiar with this case and will be fully prepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution,
as well as other issues raised by this statement, and will possess the authority to enter into stipulations on these issues at the time of
the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required.

Date: 2/17/2022

Darrell Nguyen
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)

(TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)

 Additional signatures are attached.

CM-110 [Rev. September 1, 2021] CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Page 5 of 5

21-1077 Bolghand
Unavailable Dates per Paragraph 6.c. to Case Management Conference Statement
Candice Hamant

Trial Case Associate Venue
4/04/2022 Gwaltney v. Fultz DVN Napa
4/04/2022 Zaracotas v. Camelot DMO Alameda
4/18/2022 Bryant Park Plaza v. Lyncon Construction KPL Santa Clara
4/18/2022 Clark v. Eleven Western Builders CLC Alameda
5/23/2022 Abarca v. Pulte JNC Contra Costa
5/31/2022 Kitchin v. Cisco Systems, Inc. REN Santa Clara
6/6/2022 The Globe v. The Globe JED Santa Clara
6/6/2022 USS Cal Construction Cases REN San Francisco
6/13/2022 Cano v. Alfaro KPL Alameda
6/24/2022 Lovett v. Cennox-Team Ed Los Angeles
6/24/2022 Moore v. CBRE, Inc. REN San Diego
7/20/2022 Huck v. Bridges DVN Lake
7/25/2022 Smith v. Skanska DMO San Francisco
8/15/2022 Najibullah v. Dharam DVN Alameda
8/26/2022 Uriarte v. San DVN Sonoma
9/9/2022 Kugel v. Build Group JNC Alameda
9/12/2022 Kraber v. Peyvan Contra Costa
9/12/2022 CRP v. ABC DMO Alameda
9/16/2022 Bradley v. Abbott KPL Sonoma
9/26/2022 Enkhbold v. Estrella DVN San Francisco
9/26/2022 Baker v. Frazzano SAK Alameda
9/30/2022 PG&E v. Brown JED/SMD Alameda
11/18/2022 Dixon v. CBRE REN Alameda
11/18/2022 Swoffard v. Vonmerta SAK Alameda
12/05/2022 Ocean v. Shahani DVN/KPL San Francisco
12/05/2022 Oliver v. United Property San Joaquin
01/09/2023 Moreci v. Fulton Street KPL San Francisco
01/09/2023 Nationwide v. Hoang Yolo
1/17/2023 Travelers v. Rist Fire Protection SMD Alameda
3/23/2023 LA Waterkeeper v. American Reclamation USDC-Central
3/26/2023 Musgrave v. J.W. Silveira DVN Alameda
4/23/2023 Satoosh v. Matarozzi DVN San Francisco
5/26/2023 TNT v. Nathanson JED/SMD Alameda

2/17/2022
Bolghand v. Real Property Sales, Inc.
San Mateo Superior Court Case No.: 21-CIV-04612

1 PROOF OF SERVICE
2
I declare that:
3
I am a citizen of the United States, employed in the County of Marin, California, over the
4
age of eighteen years, and not a party to the within cause. My business address is 371 Bel Marin
5 Keys Boulevard, Suite 100, Novato, CA 94949. I served the within: CASE MANAGEMENT
STATEMENT
6
PARTIES SERVED: Plaintiffs
7 Dennis Faoro
8 Rachel Given
Last & Faoro
9 177 Bovet Road, Suite 550
San Mateo, CA 94402
10 T: (650) 696-8350
F: (650) 696-8365
11
dlfaoro@lf-lawyers.com
12 ragiven@lf-lawyers.com

13 Maria Madera
mmmadera@lf-lawyers.com
14

15
_X__ BY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION ONLY. Only by electronic submission of the
16 document(s) to the person(s) at the email address(es) listed, that during the ongoing
COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic this office will be working remotely, unable to send
17 and receive physical mail as usual, and is using only electronic mail at this time. No
18 electronic message or other indication that the transmission was unsuccessful was
received within a reasonable time after the transmission of the document(s).
19

20
I certify and declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and
21 that this declaration was executed on February 17, 2022, at Novato, California.
22

23
____________________________________
24 By Juliet Kelly
25

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Document for 21-CIV-04612

Preview

Case Info

Parties

Document for 21-CIV-04612

Preview

Related Topics

Case Info

Parties