How must an attorney preserve confidential information?

Useful Rulings on Confidential Information

Recent Rulings on Confidential Information

1-25 of 10000 results

JOSE AGUILERA VS 5 STAR DELIVERY INC

Plaintiff has not provided the court with an explanation regarding why this was done or provided the court with any information regarding Zaragoza’s ability to read and/or speak English. The first loan agreement to Zaragoza is undated. Plaintiff is requested to attach and authenticate the checks attached to the complaint to any future declaration, with any handwritten notes in Spanish translated.

  • Hearing

    Sep 24, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CITRUS OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLGY VS CITRUS VALLEY HEALTH

Given the context of the claims and the involvements of the various nonparties, certain allegations consist of business and financial information collected from involvement with the business of various nonparties. Additional confidential information includes the private, financial, and business information regarding Emanate’s business, all of which has been kept confidential and designated as confidential.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Business

  • Sub Type

    Intellectual Property

HWANSHIK YOON VS ELLEN EUN YOO, ET AL.

Yoo agreed to amend the Statement of Information for CJME, Inc. (“CJME”), which E. Yoo had incorporated on November 13, 2017. Since CJME was not actively involved in business, Plaintiff and E. Yoo agreed that CJME would be used in operation of the Mugs. In amending CJME, E. Yoo remained as the CEO while Plaintiff was named as its CFO and Secretary. On September 1, 2018, Mugs opened for business.

  • Hearing

    Aug 06, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

CHING FU CHANG, ET AL. VS PAN MING LEI, ET AL.

., 10% of $76,746.15) in punitive damages, but concede that they “currently do not have sufficient information concerning Defendants’ wealth.” (Brief Summary of Case, 4:8-10.) A default judgment which includes punitive damages requires plaintiffs to provide evidence of defendants’ net worth. (See Cummings Medical Corp. v. Occupational Medical Corp. (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1291, 1298 [“Evidence of the defendant’s financial condition is relevant to a punitive damages award in two ways.

  • Hearing

    Jul 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Fraud

HOMAYOUN LARIAN VS EDWARD CZUKER, ET AL.

Sixth Cause of Action: Recording of Confidential Information Penal Code section 632, subdivision (a), makes it a crime to “intentionally and without the consent of all parties to a confidential communication, use[] an electronic amplifying or recording device to eavesdrop upon or record the confidential communication, whether the communication is carried on among the parties in the presence of one another or by means of a telegraph, telephone, or other device, except a radio.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    other

KOUROSH IZADPANAHI VS MARIA ALMA YOLANDA IBARRA DABDOUB, ET AL.

., a duty to communicate accurate information, in two circumstances. The first situation arises where providing false information poses a risk of and results in physical harm to person or property. The second situation arises where information is conveyed in a commercial setting for a business purpose.” (Friedman v. Merck & Co. (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 454, 477.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 26, 2020

LA LIVE PROPERTIES, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS KA WAIKWAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL.

Defendants/Cross-Complainants argue that “Plaintiff’s Motion to Bifurcate fails to provide this Court with any pertinent information necessary for this Court to determine that bifurcation of the Underlying Claims and the Indemnification Claims would truly promote or serve economy, efficiency, justice, or the avoiding of prejudice.” (Moy Opp., pp. 2:19-3:3; see also Kwan Opp., p. 3:24-4:1.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 23, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

PETITION OF ELBERT JAMES RUCKER

Item # 4 on Child Information Attachment Form GC-210 (CA) is incomplete. 8. Date Confidential Guardian Screening Form GC-212 9. File a declaration to clarify that you have questioned minor’s relatives as to whether minor has any Indian ancestry. Item # 8 on Child Information Attachment Form GC-210 (CA) is incomplete. The Court is waiting for these items: Court Investigator’s Report Note: Letters of Temporary Guardianship issued to petitioner expire 10-17-20.

  • Hearing

    Jul 20, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

GRDSHP OF NICKOLAS P KRAUSE

Report of Attorney Layli Caborn Notes: 1. Letters of Temporary Guardianship expire 9/4/20. 2. Per 1-3-20 minute order, father Shawn O’Guinn appeared in objection and court ordered written objections to be filed by 1-31-20. None has been filed. 3. Amended Petition for Appointment of Guardian of Estate filed by Wanda Jones is set for hearing 3-3-20.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

AMERICAN RECOVERY SERVICE INCORPORATED, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION AS ASSIGNEE OF STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, A PUBLIC E VS QUINTANA CONSTRUCTION, INC.

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

CYNTHIA MARIA RIBAS VS BEAU MONDE ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC. VS THE KROGER CO., ET AL.

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

TITO A THOMAS VS MARK ANTHONY SARNO

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

CYNTHIA MARIA RIBAS VS BEAU MONDE ASSOCIATION, ET AL.

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 17, 2020

GRACE ALBA, A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SYLVIA ALBA VS SPARKLETTS, INC., A CORPORATION, ET AL.

Counsel for the Party designating documents or information as confidential pursuant to this Order (hereinafter the ‘Designating Party’) shall identify any such documents and/or information as confidential. Confidential Documents and/or information shall be designated by the Designating Party in a conspicuous place with the words ‘CONFIDENTIAL—SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER’ or ‘HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.’

  • Hearing

    Jul 16, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Products Liability

MELODY CHACKER VS SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, AN ARIZONA CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS IN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Foreclosure

JOSE GUEVARA, ET AL. VS WALTER J RODE, ET AL.

Plaintiffs contend that despite numerous attempts by telephone and correspondence to obtain information from Defendants, no responses have ever been served. Plaintiffs argue that in a last effort, Plaintiffs voluntarily, without request, extended the time to respond, up and including February 1, 2020. (Shaffer Decl., Exh. 2.) Plaintiffs assert that the time for Defendants to serve a timely response expired on February 1, 2020 and no response has been served to date. (Shaffer Decl. ¶ 2.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

REBEKAH LYNN ROGERS ET AL VS STATER BROS MARKETS ET AL

Accordingly, the petition must be denied for Petitioner’s failure to provide complete information regarding the status of Claimant’s medical expenses as required throughout paragraph 13 of the petition. Second, Petitioner’s counsel has failed to include a discussion of applicable factors listed in California Rules of Court, rule 7.955, subdivision (b) in the declaration lodged as Attachment 14a in support of the $37,500 in attorney’s fees requested from the settlement.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

MARIA DEL CARMEN BAKLAYAN VS UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL.

the party giving the notice may move for an order compelling the deponent's attendance and testimony, and the production for inspection of any document, electronically stored information, or tangible thing described in the deposition notice.”

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

VINCENT BERRY VS EVERPORT TERMINAL SERVICES, INC.

For more information, please contact the court clerk at (213) 633-0517. Your understanding during these difficult times is appreciated.

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Wrongful Term

PENTECH FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. VS RENE MEDINA

Judgment Creditor served Judgment Debtors with the notice of levy, writ of execution, and exemption information via mail on December 18, 2019, personally served an occupant with same on December 17, 2018 and posted same in a conspicuous place on the Property on December 17, 2018. (Id., ¶18, Exh. 14.)

  • Hearing

    Jul 15, 2020

IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY PETER MAFRICA

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF BRADY AUSTIN MOSES

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com.

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Guardianship/Protective Services

IN THE MATTER OF INEZ TUTTLE

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com."

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Family Law

  • Sub Type

    Conservatorship

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT GEORGE TUPAC

For general information regarding Judge Lund and his courtroom rules and procedures, please visit: http://www.judgerogerlund.com

  • Hearing

    Jul 14, 2020

  • Type

    Probate

  • Sub Type

    Trust

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we gather your results.