arrow left
arrow right
  • Daphne Beletsis, et al vs Christopher Guevara, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD document preview
  • Daphne Beletsis, et al vs Christopher Guevara, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD document preview
  • Daphne Beletsis, et al vs Christopher Guevara, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD document preview
  • Daphne Beletsis, et al vs Christopher Guevara, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI / PD / WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 Michael C. Osborne (Bar No. 95839) mosborne@cokinoslaw.com 2 Elaine Kobylecki (Bar No. 299311) ekobylecki@cokinoslaw.com 3 COKINOS | YOUNG 611 Gateway Blvd., Ste. 233 4 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Telephone: (628) 229-980 5 Attorneys for Defendant 6 THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC. 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ 10 11 DAPHNE BELETSIS, et al., Case No. 19CV03287 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND 13 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC., et al. OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 14 ADJUDICATION 15 Defendant. Date: May 6, 2022 16 Time: 8:30 AM Department: 10 17 18 Action Filed: October 31, 2019 Trial Date: June 20, 2022 19 20 21 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 22 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on May 6, 2022 at 8:30 a.m., or as soon thereafter as this 23 matter may be heard, in Department 10 of the above-entitled Court, Defendant THETA CHI 24 FRATERNITY, INC. (“Theta Chi”), will move this Court, and hereby does move this Court for 25 an Order entering summary judgment, or in the alternative, summary adjudication in favor of Theta 26 Chi on Plaintiffs DAPHNE BELETSIS and YVONNE RAINEY’S (“Plaintiffs”) First Amended 27 Complaint. 28 DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 1 This motion is made pursuant to the following: 2 Theta Chi is entitled to summary judgment as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint 3 pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(a) because there is no triable issue as to any 4 material fact, and Theta Chi is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 5 Alternatively, Theta Chi is entitled to summary adjudication as to each of the four causes 6 of action against it in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth 7 Causes of Action) pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(f) because there is no triable 8 issue as to any material fact for each cause of action, and Theta Chi is entitled to summary judgment 9 as a matter of law on each cause of action because – 1) It did not owe a duty of care to Plaintiffs; 10 2) It did not assume any duties through its own policies or the policies of University of California 11 at Santa Cruz; 3) It is not vicariously liable for the conduct of Defendant Theta Iota Chapter of 12 Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. and its members; and 4) It is not vicariously liable based on the alter ego 13 doctrine. 14 This motion will be based on this Notice of Motion and on the papers in support served and 15 filed concurrently (Defendant’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Declaration of Michael 16 Mayer, Declaration of Michael C. Osborne, Defendant’s Separate Statement of Undisputed 17 Material Facts, and Defendant’s Index of Exhibits and Evidence and accompanying exhibits); such 18 evidence as may be presented at the hearing of the motion; and all other papers and pleadings on 19 file with the Court in this action. 20 21 Dated: February 17, 2022 COKINOS | YOUNG 22 23 24 Michael C. Osborne Elaine Kobylecki 25 Attorneys for Defendant THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC. 26 27 28 2 DEFENDANT THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC.’S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION