What is a Stipulated Judgment?

Useful Rulings on Stipulated Judgment

Recent Rulings on Stipulated Judgment

1-25 of 10000 results

PRICE VS THE CITY OF ANAHEIM

(Opposition pp. 6-7) Provided that the City agrees to a stipulated preliminary injunction on these issues, there is no imminent threat of irreparable harm based on these provisions. Plaintiffs also contend that they are facing the potential threat of criminal prosecution, but as noted by the City, Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) § 1.01.370 has for years provided that violations of any AMC provisions may be prosecuted as misdemeanors. (City RJN, Ex. L, p. 108.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2030

T-12 THREE, LLC VS. TURNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

s Motion for Summary Adjudication 4)Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant Turner Construction Company's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication Against Plaintiffs 1. Motion by Saddleback Corp. dba Saddleback Waterproof for Summary Judgment or Adjudication as to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint Defendant Saddleback’s motion for summary judgment and summary adjudication of Issues 5 and 6 (statute of limitations) is DENIED.

  • Hearing

    Apr 25, 2026

THE CITIES OF DUARTE VS STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD AND CITY OF GARDENA VS REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD

Where the judgment commands that the order or decision be set aside, it may order the reconsideration of the case in light of the court’s opinion and judgment and may order respondent to take such further action as is specially enjoined upon it by law, but the judgment shall not limit or control in any way the discretion legally vested in the respondent. (Emphasis added.) Draft Proposed Judgment.

  • Hearing

    Jun 20, 2021

CHANGLIANG DAI VS THOMAS CHEN, ET AL.

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) No Summary of the case. (CRC 3.1800 (a)(1).)

  • Hearing

    Nov 02, 2020

  • Type

    Contract

  • Sub Type

    Breach

JINGXUAN ZHANG VS HUMMINGBIRD NEST ENTERTAINMENT CORP

An Order to Show Cause Re: Failure to Proceed with Default Judgment is set for October 19, 2020. Discussion Plaintiff’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 19, 2020

  • Type

    Employment

  • Sub Type

    Other Employment

PNC EQUIPMENT FINANCE, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY VS SANTIAGO MENDOZA MUNIZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

A new proposed judgment clarifying the judgment to be entered against each defendant should be submitted. ANALYSIS Yes (7/8/20; Default Entered. (JC Form CIV-100.) 9/9/20)_________ See above Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).)

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

CHUAN JUN LI VS QI ZHAO

Zhao (KC070595) _____________________________________________ Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Tentative Ruling Plaintiff Chuan Jun Li’s Application for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 16, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

ARMEN G KOJIKIAN ET AL VS AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

The parties executed a stipulation to this effect on April 17, 2020, which also stipulated to an Addendum which revised the definition of the “Powertrain Warranty Gap Period” to end prior to the preliminary approval of the settlement. The Court never approved this Addendum. Now before the Court is the motion for final approval of the Settlement Agreement.

  • Hearing

    Oct 15, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 14, 2020

(NO CASE NAME AVAILABLE)

Yes Dismissal of all parties against whom judgment is not sought or an application for separate judgment against specified parties under CCP 579, supported by a showing of grounds for each judgment. (CRC 3.1800(a)(7).) Yes Mandatory Judicial Council Form CIV-100. (CRC 3.1800(a).) Yes Relief sought is within amount of prayer of complaint or statement of damages. (Due Process; Greenup v. Rodman (1986) 42 Cal.3d 822, 824.) N/A Summary of the case.

  • Hearing

    Oct 07, 2020

RE: FIRST AND FNL RPT ON WVR OF ACCT, FOR COMPENSATION, FINAL DIST

A judgment, decree or order must be complete in itself. LR 7.110 JULIE ANN SLOAN-ENEA PARKER SLOAN ANI KELEDJIAN PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Need: 1. Proof of mailing to all persons entitled to receive notice. LR 7.300 2. Compliance with CRC 7.250 regarding any acts taken under IAEA w/notice of proposed action. (Specifics needed including date action was taken and date notice was given) 3. Verified declaration by petitioner to clarify loss on sale.

  • Hearing

    Oct 06, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

MYRNA KAWAKITA VS GEORGE TASHJIAN MD ET AL

., for Summary Judgment” and a “Judgment by Court Under CCP § 437c” were filed. The Final Status Conference is set for April 12, 2020. Trial is set for April 20, 2020. Discussion Raymond Ghermezian, A Professional Law Corporation, seeks to be relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff (“Client”). The court has discretion to allow an attorney to withdraw, and such a motion should be granted provided that there is no prejudice to the client and it does not disrupt the orderly process of justice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS MICHAEL V SANCHEZ, AN INDIVIDUAL

claims to be raised in the motion for judgment on the pleadings.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Collections

  • Sub Type

    Promisory Note

CHANHO C. JOO, APC, DBA LAW OFFICES OF CHANHO JOO VS HONGYE LLC, DBA SPA RENAISSANCE, ET AL.

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff’s request for entry of default judgment is GRANTED. Default judgment is entered in the amount of $67,304.02, consisting of $60,427.90 in damages, $6,291.12 in pre-judgment interest, and $585.00 in costs. Plaintiff must e-file a corrected proposed judgment at least 2 court days before the hearing.

  • Hearing

    Oct 02, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Landlord Tenant

AMERICAN EXPRESS NATIONAL BANK VS. HERNANDEZ

The Court intends to rule as follows; To grant Plaintiff American Express National Bank's unopposed motion for an order vacating dismissal and entering judgment against defendants pursuant to CCP §664.6. Moving party to give notice.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

JUAN PALMA ET AL VS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC ET AL

On December 1, 2017, SARH filed a cross-complaint, asserting causes of action against Cross-Defendants Aviation West Charters, LLC, dba Angel Medflight World Wide Air Ambulance (“Aviation”) and Roes 1-100 for: On April 26, 2018, the court granted KFHPI’s motion for summary judgment and granted KFH’s and SCPMG’s respective motions for summary adjudication of the third cause of action. On December 5, 2018, a Notice of Settlement was filed as between Plaintiffs and KFH, SCPMG, KFHPI and Shah.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

BENJAMIN F. POCO, ET AL. VS WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, ET AL.

Poco’s MOTION FOR ORDER FOR QUIET TITLE JUDGMENT[1] Tentative Ruling See below. Background Plaintiffs Benjamin F. Poco (“Benjamin”) and Bienvenida G.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Type

    Real Property

  • Sub Type

    Quiet Title

VANESSA WHITNEY VS CHAIM DERRY

On 11/21/19, the Court entered Judgment in Plaintiff’s favor and against Defendant in the total amount of $50,000. Defendant now moves to set aside the default and default judgment. Prior Motion to Dismiss On 2/04/20, the Court ruled on Defendant’s motion to dismiss. The Court ruled: On 12/18/19, Defendant filed this motion to dismiss the 11/21/19 Judgment. The motion is denied for the following reasons: Defendant is in default.

  • Hearing

    Oct 01, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

CONS. OF MARYLUE BURR

Note: Per minute order dated 8/18/2020, counsel had a stipulated order waiving notice. No waivers of notice are on file ELIZABETH MARIE KYLE LINDA S DURSTON PH.D. THE ELIZABET M KYLE TRUST, DAT PROBATE EXAMINER NOTES-SUBJECT TO REVISION AFTER REVIEW BY THE JUDGE Melyssa Greenberg, guardian, still needs to do the following: 1.

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2020

  • Judge

    George

  • County

    Contra Costa County, CA

IVETTE ROSALES ET AL VS THE NORTHEAST COMMUNITY CLINIC ET AL

“‘When a defendant moves for summary judgment and supports his motion with expert declarations that his conduct fell within the community standard of care, he is entitled to summary judgment unless the plaintiff comes forward with conflicting expert evidence.’“ (Munro v. Regents of University of California (1989) 215 Cal.App.3d 977, 984-985.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 30, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    Medical Malpractice

HENNESY V. ASHLEY

(Judgment, attached to Amended Complaint, Exhibit A, ¶ 6(g).) “Reference to “1516 Owner” or “1518 Owner” in this Judgment is deemed to mean the current and future owners of those respective parcels with those street address numbers.” (Judgment, attached to Amended Complaint, Exhibit A, ¶ 6(a).)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

GUDINO V. DURAN ET AL.

(b)) “A claim has ‘probable validity’ where it is more likely than not that the plaintiff will obtain a judgment against the defendant on that claim.” (§ 481.190, subd. (a); see Santa Clara Waste Water Co. v. Allied World National Assurance Co. (2017) 18 Cal.App.5th 881, 885.)

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

LEER V. GHITTERMAN, GHITTERMAN, & FELD

.) ; declaratory judgment; wrongful termination in violation of public policy; and numerous wage and hour violations, including unpaid overtime, failure to provide meal and rest periods, failure to pay final wages in timely manner, noncompliant wage statements, and violation of Unfair Competition per Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

STEPHEN ALAN GREEN VS AXIALL CORPORATION, ET AL

Jay Ford III Department O September 10, 2020 Notwithstanding the deadline to hear motions for summary judgment 30 days before trial, the Court orders that all motions for summary judgment are to be timely noticed to be heard on December 3, 2020. Counsel are to contact the Clerk to request any reservation hearing date obtained in CRS be moved to December 3, 2020 before the motion is filed.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Judge

    H. Jay Ford

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA VS REDFORD INDUSTRIAL-1065 WALNUT, LLC, ET AL.

Standard A “motion for summary judgment shall be granted if all the papers submitted show that there is no triable issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” (C.C.P., § 437c(c).) "A moving party need only show it is entitled to the benefit of a presumption affecting the burden of producing evidence in order to shift the burden of proof to the opposing party to show there are triable issues of fact. [Security Pac. Nat. Bank v.

  • Hearing

    Sep 29, 2020

  • Type

    Personal Injury/ Tort

  • Sub Type

    other

  • Judge

    Maurice A. Leiter or Salvatore Sirna

  • County

    Los Angeles County, CA

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 400     last » 

For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.

Please wait a moment while we load this page.