arrow left
arrow right
  • JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ VS. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH ET AL PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ VS. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH ET AL PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ VS. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH ET AL PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE document preview
  • JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ VS. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH ET AL PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE document preview
						
                                

Preview

1 DONALD J. PUTTERMAN (SBN 90822) E-mail: dputterman@plylaw.com 2 DANNIELLE M. CAMPBELL (SBN 303204) E-mail: dcampbell@plylaw.com ELECTRONICALLY 3 PUTTERMAN | YU LLP F I L E D 345 California Street, Suite 1160 Superior Court of California, 4 San Francisco, CA 94104-2626 County of San Francisco Telephone: (415) 839-8779 03/08/2021 5 Facsimile: (415) 737-1363 Clerk of the Court BY: ERNALYN BURA 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Deputy Clerk JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 11 JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ, Case No. CGC-20-588007 12 Plaintiff, JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ’S NOTICE 13 OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & 14 SMITH INC.’S APPLICATION FOR MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & ORDER ADMITTING JODIE 15 SMITH INCORPORATED, a Delaware HERRMANN LAWSON AS ITS Corporation; and DOES 1-25, inclusive, COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE 16 Defendants. Complaint Filed: November 25, 2020 17 Hearing Date: March 30, 2021 18 Time: 9:30 a.m. 19 Dept.: 302 Judge: Hon. Ethan P. Schulman 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 KATZ’S NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MERRILL LYNCH’S APPLICATION FOR ORDER ADMITTING JODIE HERRMANN LAWSON AS ITS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE 1 On March 4, 2021, pursuant to Rule 9.40 of the California Rules of Court, Jodie Herrmann 2 Lawson of McGuireWoods LLP, representing Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith 3 Incorporated, submitted an Application for Order Admitting Jodie Herrmann Lawson as its counsel 4 Pro Hac Vice, as well as her concurrently filed verified declaration in support of same in this action. 5 On March 3, 2021, Donald J. Putterman, counsel of record for Plaintiff Jami Handelman Katz 6 (“Plaintiff”), informed Ms. Lawson that Plaintiff, by and through her counsel, did not intend to 7 oppose the Pro Hac Vice Application. 8 Upon review and consideration of the Pro Hac Vice Application and all associated pleadings, 9 Plaintiff hereby respectfully advises the Court and counsel that Plaintiff does not oppose the 10 Application. 11 12 DATED: March 8, 2021 Respectfully submitted, PUTTERMAN | YU LLP 13 14 By: 15 DONALD J. PUTTERMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 JAMI HANDELMAN KATZ 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 KATZ’S NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MERRILL LYNCH’S APPLICATION FOR ORDER ADMITTING JODIE HERRMANN LAWSON AS ITS COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE