Stipulation,Agreement: LOUIS PAYCHECK vs. PUNIT K. SARNA, et al

• 
• 
• 
• 

						
                                
Preview
                                1    MATTHEW A. HAULK (SBN: 272457)
                        RAGGHIANTI          FREITAS       LLP                                       1/20/2022
                   2    1101 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100
                        San Rafael, California 94901
                   3
                        Telephone:       (415) 453-9433
                        Facsimile:       (415) 453-8269
                   4
                        Attorneys for Defendants
                   5
                        PUNIT K. SARNA and
                        PUJA SARNA
                   6

                   7

                   8                           SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

                   9                                              COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

                  10    LOUIS PAYCHECK,                                               CASE NO.:        19CIV02595
                  11
                                                   Plaintiff,                         STIPULATION TO FORM OF
                  12
                                                                                      JUDGMENT AND FORM OF ORDER TO
                                          vs.                                         RELEASE MECHANICS’S LIEN AND
                  13                                                                  AMENDMENT TO MECHANIC’S LIEN
                        PUNIT K. SARNA, et al.,
                  14
                                                   Defendants.
                  15
                                                                                      Complaint Filed:         May 10, 2019
                  16    AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION.                                     Trial Date:              May 12, 2021; May 26,
                                                                                                               2021
                  17
                                 On December 20, 2021, Defendant and Cross-Complainant PUNIT SARNA and
                  18
                        Defendant PUJA SARNA submitted a proposed form of Judgment and a Proposed Order
                  19
                        Releasing Mechanic’s Lien and Amendment to Mechanic’s Lien. Plaintiff and Cross-
                  20
                        Defendant LOUIS PAYCHECK d/b/a/ EUROPEAN ENTERPRISES stipulated to the
                  21
                        proposed form of Judgment and the Proposed Order Releasing Mechanic’s Lien and
                  22
                        Amendment to Mechanic’s Lien
                  23
                                 On December 22, 2021, the court denied the proposed form of the Judgment and
                  24
                        proposed Order Releasing Mechanic’s Lien and Amendment to Mechanic’s Lien with the
                  25
                        following instructions: “Please resubmit to show POS to Cross-Defendant and legal
                  26
                        support expungement of mechanic’s lien”.
                  27
                                 The Judgment in this matter disposes of and dismisses LOUIS PAYCHECK’S
                  28
                        cause of action to enforce a mechanic’s lien. California Civil Code section 8490 requires
                                                                                   1

                                                [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING LIEN AND AMENDMENT TO LIEN
                   1    that an order or judgment dismissing a cause of action to enforce a lien include the

                   2    following information: (1) The date of recordation of the claim of lien, (2) the county in

                   3    which the claim of lien is recorded, (3) the book and page or series of number of the

                   4    place in the official records where the claim of lien is recorded, and (4) the legal

                   5    description of the property. The Proposed Order Releasing Mechanic’s Lien and

                   6    Amendment to Mechanic’s Lien is intended to comply with these requirements.

                   7             The parties jointly request that the court enter the proposed form of Judgment and

                   8    the Proposed Order Releasing Mechanic’s Lien and Amendment to Mechanic’s Lien filed

                   9    herewith.

                  10    Dated: January 19, 2022                                   Ragghianti Freitas LLP
                  11
                                                                                   By:   /s/ Matthew A. Haulk
                  12                                                               _________________________________
                                                                                   Matthew A. Haulk, Esq.;
                  13                                                               Attorneys for Defendants PUNIT K. SARNA
                                                                                   and PUJA SARNA & Cross Complainant
                  14                                                               PUNIT K. SARNA
                  15

                  16
                        Dated: January 19, 2022                                    Kelly Litigation Group, Inc.
                  17
                                                                                   By: /s/ Richard M .Kelly, Esq.
                  18                                                                _________________________________
                                                                                   Richard M. Kelly, Esq.
                  19
                                                                                   Michael Mengarelli, Esq.;
                  20                                                               Attorneys for Plaintiff & Cross Defendant,
                                                                                   LOUIS PAYCHECK dba
                  21                                                               EUROPEAN ENTERPRISES
                  22

                  23

                  24

                  25

                  26

                  27

                  28

                                                                                   2

                                                [PROPOSED] ORDER RELEASING LIEN AND AMENDMENT TO LIEN