On February 23, 2004 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Gayle M. Ormond,
Ormond, Gayle M.,
and
Hogarty, William R.,
Larder, Nadine,
Larder, Thomas J.,
Nadine Larder,
Olympic Funding, Inc., A California Corporation,
Surety Bonding Company Of America,
Thomas J. Larder,
William R. Hogarty,
for Professional Negligence
in the District Court of Alameda County.
Preview
mn02
sae
04/05/04 MON 08:56 FAX 9252742910 CARDOZA.. LAW OFFICES
een nerd t
So vavggnED
‘bab. oe
5 ob won in] eo &
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NAME AND ADDRESS : . _ TELEPHONE: OR COUR ~ wer ~
Barbara Zanger Zuniga (SBN 139906) ~ 925-274-2900 Sos fe o ot
“Michael E. Cardoza, Esq. (SBN BoPbd) .
THE CARDOZA LAW’OFFICES pel .
ED. -
1111 Civic Drive, Suite 320
ean
Walnut Creek, California 94596 an
ATTORNEY FOR (NAME): De fendant, NADINE LAR DER.
Insert name of court, judicial district or branch court, if any, and post office and street adaress: .
Superior. Court,.of California ALAMEDA ¢COUN” Yo
County of Alameda-— Gale/Schenone. fail. of Justice qa.
15672. Stoneridge ‘Drive : APR, Qa 20
“| Pleasanton California 94588 SUR eA COURT
oo ‘ LER ae cE aries a
oo , y —— Deputy
PLAINTIFF: GAYLEM. ORMOND
DEFENDANT: NADINE LARDER
=. ANSWER - Contract = CASE NUMBER: |
ial TO COMPLAINT. OF: (name): preach of Fiduciary Duty, ET AL.. ee
oO TO CROSS-COMPLAINT OF (name): VG04142332
oe This pleading, including attachments and exhibits, consists of the following number of pages:
’.2.. DEFENDANT (name): NADINE LARDER. pee
’ answers the complaint or cross-complaint as s follows: a
3. Check ONLY ONE of the next two boxes:
7ab:4| Defendant generally denies each statement. of. the complaint Or. cross-complaint. (Do not check,this box if ~
the verified complaint or cross-complaint demands more than $1,000.)
vb. Defendant admits that all of the statements of the complaint or cross-compiaint are true EXCEPT: |
(1) Defendant claims the following statements are false (use Paragraph numbers or explain):
-* 4
- E24) Continued on Attachment’ 3. b: (1).
(2) Defendant has no information or belief that the- following statements are true, So defendant, denies them.
of (use paragraph numbers or explain): rots OM a
a =
mo ‘
oS. -
o< ‘
; Continued on Attachment: 4, b, Q..
ooh ‘Coritinuée)
—_ ” Form Approved by the : be ‘If this form is used to answer a cross- -complaint, plaintiff: means ¢ross-complainant and defendant means cross-defendant. ©
Judicial Council of California = >"
aici ee ANSWER - Contract...
.
s
.
"+ Optional Form
ON MegR Aasa2
APR 05 2004 09:52 — "9252742910 SF" = PAGE. 02
btn te
—a
4/05/04 MON 08:56 FAX 9252742910 ; CARDOZA LAW OFFICES 003
«> a,
@
@
SHORT TITLE: ORMOND vs. LARDER CASE NUMBER:
VG04142332
ANSWER - Contract Page two
4. KX) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Defendant alleges the following additional reasons that plaintiff is not entitled to recover anything:
DEFENDANT HEREWITH GENERALLY ASSERTS THAT PLAINTIFF COMES TO THIS COURT WITH
UNCLEAN HANDS, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY ERROR MAY HAVE OCCURRED IT WAS
ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLAINTIFF.
{(D.] Continued on Attachment 4.
5. ([] ‘Other:
6. DEFENDANT PRAYS
a. that plaintiff take nothing,
b, for costs of suit.
c. (_) other (specify): OTHER DAMAGES AS THIS COURT MAY SEEM JUST AND PROPER.
Barbara Zanger Zuniga (SBN 139906)
(Type or print name) (Signature of party or attorney}
. Page two
APR 05 2004 09:52 9252742910 _ PAGE. 03
=
Document Filed Date
April 05, 2004
Case Filing Date
February 23, 2004
Category
Professional Negligence
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
mn02 sae 04/05/04 MON 08:56 FAX 9252742910 CARDOZA.. LAW OFFICES een nerd t So vavggnED ‘bab. oe 5 ob won in] eo & ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (NAME AND ADDRESS : . _ TELEPHONE: OR COUR ~ wer ~ Barbara Zanger Zuniga (SBN 139906) ~ 925-274-2900 Sos fe o ot “Michael E. Cardoza, Esq. (SBN BoPbd) . THE CARDOZA LAW’OFFICES pel . ED. - 1111 Civic Drive, Suite 320 ean Walnut Creek, California 94596 an ATTORNEY FOR (NAME): De fendant, NADINE LAR DER. Insert name of court, judicial district or branch court, if any, and post office and street adaress: . Superior. Court,.of California ALAMEDA ¢COUN” Yo County of Alameda-— Gale/Schenone. fail. of Justice qa. 15672. Stoneridge ‘Drive : APR, Qa 20 “| Pleasanton California 94588 SUR eA COURT oo ‘ LER ae cE aries a oo , y —— Deputy PLAINTIFF: GAYLEM. ORMOND DEFENDANT: NADINE LARDER =. ANSWER - Contract = CASE NUMBER: | ial TO COMPLAINT. OF: (name): preach of Fiduciary Duty, ET AL.. ee oO TO CROSS-COMPLAINT OF (name): VG04142332 oe This pleading, including attachments and exhibits, consists of the following number of pages: ’.2.. DEFENDANT (name): NADINE LARDER. pee ’ answers the complaint or cross-complaint as s follows: a 3. Check ONLY ONE of the next two boxes: 7ab:4| Defendant generally denies each statement. of. the complaint Or. cross-complaint. (Do not check,this box if ~ the verified complaint or cross-complaint demands more than $1,000.) vb. Defendant admits that all of the statements of the complaint or cross-compiaint are true EXCEPT: | (1) Defendant claims the following statements are false (use Paragraph numbers or explain): -* 4 - E24) Continued on Attachment’ 3. b: (1). (2) Defendant has no information or belief that the- following statements are true, So defendant, denies them. of (use paragraph numbers or explain): rots OM a a = mo ‘ oS. - o< ‘ ; Continued on Attachment: 4, b, Q.. ooh ‘Coritinuée) —_ ” Form Approved by the : be ‘If this form is used to answer a cross- -complaint, plaintiff: means ¢ross-complainant and defendant means cross-defendant. © Judicial Council of California = >" aici ee ANSWER - Contract... . s . "+ Optional Form ON MegR Aasa2 APR 05 2004 09:52 — "9252742910 SF" = PAGE. 02 btn te —a 4/05/04 MON 08:56 FAX 9252742910 ; CARDOZA LAW OFFICES 003 «> a, @ @ SHORT TITLE: ORMOND vs. LARDER CASE NUMBER: VG04142332 ANSWER - Contract Page two 4. KX) AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Defendant alleges the following additional reasons that plaintiff is not entitled to recover anything: DEFENDANT HEREWITH GENERALLY ASSERTS THAT PLAINTIFF COMES TO THIS COURT WITH UNCLEAN HANDS, AND TO THE EXTENT THAT ANY ERROR MAY HAVE OCCURRED IT WAS ATTRIBUTABLE TO PLAINTIFF. {(D.] Continued on Attachment 4. 5. ([] ‘Other: 6. DEFENDANT PRAYS a. that plaintiff take nothing, b, for costs of suit. c. (_) other (specify): OTHER DAMAGES AS THIS COURT MAY SEEM JUST AND PROPER. Barbara Zanger Zuniga (SBN 139906) (Type or print name) (Signature of party or attorney} . Page two APR 05 2004 09:52 9252742910 _ PAGE. 03 =