Preview
FROM :SIAM LAW GROUP FAs NO, :4688771548 Aug, 15 264 85:46AM Pils
FILED BY FAX
Hab Siam, State Bar No, 214787 ALAMEDA COUNTY
SIAM LAW GROUP August 18, 2004
2921 8. Winchester Blvd. CLER
Campbell, CA 95008 KOF
Telephone: (408) 873-0303 By Gorn ese A RT
Pout
Fax Number: (408) 877-1548
CASE NUMBER:
RG03106646
Attorneys for Plaintiff Gwen R. Sykes
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
10 GWEN R. SYKES, Case No, RG03106646
ll Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF SERVICE BY
12 Vv,
MAIL OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
13 DOUGLAS SYKES, an individual, and SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
DOES 1-20, inclusive ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
14 ADJUDICATION
Defendants.
15 BY FAX
16
DATE: August 31, 2004
17 TIME: 2:00 p.m,
DEPT: 31
18 TRIAL DATE: October 1, 2004
i9 1, Hab Siam, declare under penalty of perjury that the following facts are true and correct:
20
1, I'm an American citizen who is employed in Santa Clara County, California, My
zl
business address is 2921 5. Winchester Blvd., Campbell, CA 95008.
22
2. I’m over 18 years old, and I’m not a party to any of the actions specified above.
23
3, On August 17, 2004, I caused the document(s) specified below to be served on the
24
25 parties specified on the attached service list:
26 a. PLAINTLFF’S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
27 JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION;
28 1
PLAINTIFT'S PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OL PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDAN'I"S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN TL ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Case No. RG03 106646
FROM = SIAM LAW GROUP FAS NO. 4688771548 Aug. 16 2664 85:46AM Pii6
b. PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISPUTED AND
UNDISPUTED FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
¢, DECLARATION OF HAB SIAM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTTON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
d. EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION OF HAB SIAM IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
e. DECLARATION OF GWEN SYKES IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
10 f. EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION OF GWEN SYKES IN OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN
ll THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
12 g. EXIWIBIT B TO DECLARATION OF HAB SIAM IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, LN THE
13 ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION;
14 h. [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
15 ADJUDICATION; and
16 PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF PAPERS IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
7 JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY
ADJUDICATION.
18
4. Tam readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collecting and processing
19
correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, in the ordinary course of business,
20
correspondence would be deposited with the U.S, Postal Service on that same day with postage
21
22 on such correspondence fully prepaid at Campbell, California. I am aware that, on motion of the
23 party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or the postage meter date
24 is more than one day after the deposit date for mailing in affidavit. I placed true and correct
25 copies of the document(s) specilicd above in scaled envelopes addressed to Steven B. Piser, Law
26
Offices of Steven B. Piser, 499 Fourteenth Street, Suite 210, Oakland, CA 94612.
27
28
2
PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF SERVICL BY MAIL OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION ‘10 YEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVL, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION
Case No. RG03 106646
FROM :SIAM LAL! GROUP FAS NO. i 4888771545 Aug. 16 2664 85:46AM P1i?
T declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Statc of California that the
foregoing information is true and correct.
Fxecuted: August 17, 2004 z
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 3
PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANI'S-
MOTION TOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADIUDICATION
Case No, RG03106646
Preview
FROM :SIAM LAW GROUP FAs NO, :4688771548 Aug, 15 264 85:46AM Pils FILED BY FAX Hab Siam, State Bar No, 214787 ALAMEDA COUNTY SIAM LAW GROUP August 18, 2004 2921 8. Winchester Blvd. CLER Campbell, CA 95008 KOF Telephone: (408) 873-0303 By Gorn ese A RT Pout Fax Number: (408) 877-1548 CASE NUMBER: RG03106646 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gwen R. Sykes SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA 10 GWEN R. SYKES, Case No, RG03106646 ll Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF SERVICE BY 12 Vv, MAIL OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 13 DOUGLAS SYKES, an individual, and SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE DOES 1-20, inclusive ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 14 ADJUDICATION Defendants. 15 BY FAX 16 DATE: August 31, 2004 17 TIME: 2:00 p.m, DEPT: 31 18 TRIAL DATE: October 1, 2004 i9 1, Hab Siam, declare under penalty of perjury that the following facts are true and correct: 20 1, I'm an American citizen who is employed in Santa Clara County, California, My zl business address is 2921 5. Winchester Blvd., Campbell, CA 95008. 22 2. I’m over 18 years old, and I’m not a party to any of the actions specified above. 23 3, On August 17, 2004, I caused the document(s) specified below to be served on the 24 25 parties specified on the attached service list: 26 a. PLAINTLFF’S MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 27 JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; 28 1 PLAINTIFT'S PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OL PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDAN'I"S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN TL ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Case No. RG03 106646 FROM = SIAM LAW GROUP FAS NO. 4688771548 Aug. 16 2664 85:46AM Pii6 b. PLAINTIFFS SEPARATE STATEMENT OF DISPUTED AND UNDISPUTED FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; ¢, DECLARATION OF HAB SIAM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTTON FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; d. EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION OF HAB SIAM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; e. DECLARATION OF GWEN SYKES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; 10 f. EXHIBIT A TO DECLARATION OF GWEN SYKES IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN ll THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; 12 g. EXIWIBIT B TO DECLARATION OF HAB SIAM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, LN THE 13 ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION; 14 h. [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY 15 ADJUDICATION; and 16 PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY 7 JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION. 18 4. Tam readily familiar with the firm’s practice for collecting and processing 19 correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, in the ordinary course of business, 20 correspondence would be deposited with the U.S, Postal Service on that same day with postage 21 22 on such correspondence fully prepaid at Campbell, California. I am aware that, on motion of the 23 party served, service is presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or the postage meter date 24 is more than one day after the deposit date for mailing in affidavit. I placed true and correct 25 copies of the document(s) specilicd above in scaled envelopes addressed to Steven B. Piser, Law 26 Offices of Steven B. Piser, 499 Fourteenth Street, Suite 210, Oakland, CA 94612. 27 28 2 PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF SERVICL BY MAIL OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION ‘10 YEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVL, SUMMARY ADJUDICATION Case No. RG03 106646 FROM :SIAM LAL! GROUP FAS NO. i 4888771545 Aug. 16 2664 85:46AM P1i? T declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the Statc of California that the foregoing information is true and correct. Fxecuted: August 17, 2004 z 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 PLAINTIFF'S PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OF PAPERS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANI'S- MOTION TOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUMMARY ADIUDICATION Case No, RG03106646