arrow left
arrow right
  • Sykes VS Sykes Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Sykes VS Sykes Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

05-27-2004 12:57 FROM “1c STEVEN B. PISER, SBN 62414 LAW A OFFICES Professional OF STEVEN Corporation B. PISER FILED ALAMEDA COUNTY i) 499 Fourteenth Srreet, Suite 210 Oakland, California 94612 Ww Telephone 510-835-5582 MAY 2 7 2004 CLERK OF THE SUPER; BP Attomey for Douglas G. Sykes OR CouatT By US : Deputy IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA GWEN R. SYKES, ) Case No. RGO3106646 ) Plainuff, } MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND - ) AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF v, ) MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER ) RESPONSES TO FORM AND SPECIAL DOUGLAS SYKES,; an individual, DOES-I---) INTERROGATORIES AND FOR 14 through 20, inclusive, SANCTIONS AGAINST GWEN ROWE- LEE 15 Defendants Date: June 18, 2004 B 16 Time: 2:00 p.m. Dept: 31 Y FAX 17 Trial Date: October 1, 2004 18 A court shall order further responses where a response to an interrogatory isinadequate or evasive. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030(1). Unless the court finds that the party who refused to comply with the Discovery Act acted with substantial justification, sanctions should be awarded. Code of Civil Procedure section 2023(b). Dated: May 27, 2004 LAW OFFI S OF STEVEN B. PISER A Professi al Corporation Legal By: FiledBy hom B. Piser ttomey for Defendant ouglas Sykes One LawOffices of 1 STEVEN B. PISER MEMO ISO MTN TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA AND FOR SANCTIONS MAY 27 2684 13:@1 PAGE . 85