On June 20, 2001 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Chester Jason, Jr.,
and
Clifford K. Mau,
Collins & Mau,Llp,
for Unlimited Civil
in the District Court of Alameda County.
Preview
_ e eo kumannn
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, [_FORCOURT USEONLY |
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ce ee
! FILED
ALAMEDA COUNTY
CHESTER JASON, JR. FEB 25 20027
Plaintiff CLERK OF laa,
THE SUPERIGK
. vs. By oy; Gos
COURT
CLIFFORD K. MAU, ET AL Deputy
Defendant
Casenumber
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDERS 842396-6
AND ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
At the conclusion of the judicially supervised Case Management Conference in the above captioned
matter, THE COURT HAS ORDERED THE FOLLOWING:
1. A further Case Management Conference isscheduled for 4/19/2002 at10:40 AM in Dept. 19.
Updated CMC Statements (pursuant to Local Rule 4.3) shall be lodged inDept. 19 no laterthan
4/12/2002.
2. All unserved parties to be served so asto allow timely notice to appear atthe next Case
Management Conference. ,
3. Compliance with any of paragraphs (a) through (g) below is required ONLY ifsuch
paragraph ismarked with an “X” in the space provided:
[_] (a) Parties shall timely file (_]any demurrers, orsimilar motions challenging the pleadings, .
(_]summary judgment or summary adjudication motions,
so that adjudication of such motions shalloccur before the next CMC statements are due.
(b) Defense medical examination of plaintiff to be completed, and doctor to be deposed, before
the next CMC statements are due.
OO
(c) All non-expert depositions shall be completed before the next CMC statements are due.
(d) All interrogatory and/or document production discovery shall be completed before the next
CMC statements are due
(e) The identities of experts shall be disclosed and allexperts shall be deposed before the next
Oh
CMC statements are due (without prejudice tothe disclosure of additional experts per CCP
section 2034 prior to trial).
(£)All parties and claims adjusters must attend the next Case Management Conference.
LO)
(g) The case is referred to [_] Judicial Arbitration [_] private ADR, said process to be
completed before the next CMC Statement isdue to be lodged in this court,the resultsthereof to
be included insaid Statement, unless precluded by a confidentiality agreement.
FCMC - Rev.
3/18/98
(dkb)
as
©
|
®@
4. Other orders and/or comments:
PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL FILED A MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD. IT APPEARS
TO HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON 2/21/02. HOWEVER, THE NOTICE GIVE WAS NOT TO THE CLIENT,
BUT RATHER TO THE DEFENDANT. CLEARLY, THAT ORDER MUST BE VACATED AND COUNSEL
MUST APPEAR AT THE NEXT CMC UNLESS PROPERLY RELIEVED, IN WHICH CASE NOTICE TO HIS
CLIENT OF THE CMC SCHEDULED MUST BE GIVEN.
a
5. Any delay in the trial,caused by non-compliance with/ any order contained herein, shal} be the subject
of sanctions pursuant to CCP 177.5. “a
DATED: February 25,2002 Li
Defendant(s) Attorney(s)
my ASM E oe 70 Bt
eee Loy ~~
—
On aL -: Ser) .
Ll aeroeene
ST=EGuAT spanqet
ner
CLERE.”
Document Filed Date
February 25, 2002
Case Filing Date
June 20, 2001
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
_ e eo kumannn SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, [_FORCOURT USEONLY | COUNTY OF ALAMEDA ce ee ! FILED ALAMEDA COUNTY CHESTER JASON, JR. FEB 25 20027 Plaintiff CLERK OF laa, THE SUPERIGK . vs. By oy; Gos COURT CLIFFORD K. MAU, ET AL Deputy Defendant Casenumber CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDERS 842396-6 AND ORDER SETTING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE At the conclusion of the judicially supervised Case Management Conference in the above captioned matter, THE COURT HAS ORDERED THE FOLLOWING: 1. A further Case Management Conference isscheduled for 4/19/2002 at10:40 AM in Dept. 19. Updated CMC Statements (pursuant to Local Rule 4.3) shall be lodged inDept. 19 no laterthan 4/12/2002. 2. All unserved parties to be served so asto allow timely notice to appear atthe next Case Management Conference. , 3. Compliance with any of paragraphs (a) through (g) below is required ONLY ifsuch paragraph ismarked with an “X” in the space provided: [_] (a) Parties shall timely file (_]any demurrers, orsimilar motions challenging the pleadings, . (_]summary judgment or summary adjudication motions, so that adjudication of such motions shalloccur before the next CMC statements are due. (b) Defense medical examination of plaintiff to be completed, and doctor to be deposed, before the next CMC statements are due. OO (c) All non-expert depositions shall be completed before the next CMC statements are due. (d) All interrogatory and/or document production discovery shall be completed before the next CMC statements are due (e) The identities of experts shall be disclosed and allexperts shall be deposed before the next Oh CMC statements are due (without prejudice tothe disclosure of additional experts per CCP section 2034 prior to trial). (£)All parties and claims adjusters must attend the next Case Management Conference. LO) (g) The case is referred to [_] Judicial Arbitration [_] private ADR, said process to be completed before the next CMC Statement isdue to be lodged in this court,the resultsthereof to be included insaid Statement, unless precluded by a confidentiality agreement. FCMC - Rev. 3/18/98 (dkb) as © | ®@ 4. Other orders and/or comments: PLAINTIFF’S COUNSEL FILED A MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD. IT APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN GRANTED ON 2/21/02. HOWEVER, THE NOTICE GIVE WAS NOT TO THE CLIENT, BUT RATHER TO THE DEFENDANT. CLEARLY, THAT ORDER MUST BE VACATED AND COUNSEL MUST APPEAR AT THE NEXT CMC UNLESS PROPERLY RELIEVED, IN WHICH CASE NOTICE TO HIS CLIENT OF THE CMC SCHEDULED MUST BE GIVEN. a 5. Any delay in the trial,caused by non-compliance with/ any order contained herein, shal} be the subject of sanctions pursuant to CCP 177.5. “a DATED: February 25,2002 Li Defendant(s) Attorney(s) my ASM E oe 70 Bt eee Loy ~~ — On aL -: Ser) . Ll aeroeene ST=EGuAT spanqet ner CLERE.”