On June 20, 2001 a
Party Statement
was filed
involving a dispute between
Chester Jason, Jr.,
and
Clifford K. Mau,
Collins & Mau,Llp,
for Unlimited Civil
in the District Court of Alameda County.
Preview
eo @ ‘cc
—
IAWATHA T. ROBERTS, ESQ. SB# 25320 F {
OBERTS & STOKES ALAMEDA COUNTY
ttorneys at Law
WN
576 Tenth Street JAN 07 2002”
akland, CA 94607-4038 CL
WY
elephone: (510) 655-5722 ERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
‘\forms\with-dec By Gaa,
&
ttorney Plaintiff; . Deputy
Chester Jason
vn
Dn
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
NI
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, NORTHERN BRANCH
OA
UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
oO
10
|CHESTER JASON CASE NO. 842396-6
11
Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF HIAWATHA T.
12 ROBERTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
VS. TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL
13
CLIFFORD K. MAU, et al. [Code Civ. Proc. § 284(2); Cal. Rules Prof.
14 Conduct, Rule 3-700(B)]
Defendants.
15 Date: January 30, 2002
/ Time: 2:00 p.m.
16 Dept: 31
17
il,HIAWATHA T. ROBERTS, declare:
18
1. I am the attorney of record for plaintiff Chester Jason in the above-entitled matter.
19
2. I was employed to represent Plaintiff inthis action by a written agreement
20
executed on or about the inception of their joint appearance herein, by the terms of which either
21
party to the agreement was empowered to end the contract and employment relationship upon
22
imely and reasonable notice to the other party to the agreement. Implicit in the agreement was the
23
laintiff s commitment to do all that was reasonably necessary to help me in the preparation of
24
his case for trial, and or to bring the matter to a resolution by settlement, including an agreed
25
easonable compensation plus reimbursement of costs,
26
3. Factors have arisen that permit me to seek the court's authorization to be relieved as
27
counsel for Plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule
28
3-700, subdivision (C). I am moving under § 284(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for an order
o be relieved as counsel for plaintiff, because plaintiff wishes to terminate my services and either
employ another attorney or represent himself. Additional evidence detailing these factors can be
set out ina separate supplemental declaration filed under seal for review by the court in camera,
ifthe Court so desires.
NW
I have informed Plaintiff that I intended to withdraw as Counsel of Record inthe above
DBD
ntitled action pursuant to his wishes..
NN
CAO
5. I have also informed the Defendant of my intention to bring this motion.
6. The residence address of each defendant is set forth herein: Defendant Mau: 1305
oO
10 Franklin Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612, and Defendant Collins & Mau LLP: 1305
11 Franklin Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612. This isconfirmed by the fact that these addresses
12 lhave been the defendants respective addresses from the onset of the Attorney-client relationship,
13 and the address to which we have mailed documents, to which the defendants have responded.
14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
15 foregoing is true and correct.
16
17
18
Dated: January 3, 2002 Law Offices Of Roberts & Stokes
19
20
21 By: Hiawatha T. Roberts, Esq, Attorney for
Plaintiff, Chester Jason
22
V/
23
V//
24
V/
25
26
27
28
Document Filed Date
January 07, 2002
Case Filing Date
June 20, 2001
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
eo @ ‘cc — IAWATHA T. ROBERTS, ESQ. SB# 25320 F { OBERTS & STOKES ALAMEDA COUNTY ttorneys at Law WN 576 Tenth Street JAN 07 2002” akland, CA 94607-4038 CL WY elephone: (510) 655-5722 ERK OF THE SUPERIOR COURT ‘\forms\with-dec By Gaa, & ttorney Plaintiff; . Deputy Chester Jason vn Dn IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA NI COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, NORTHERN BRANCH OA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION oO 10 |CHESTER JASON CASE NO. 842396-6 11 Plaintiff, DECLARATION OF HIAWATHA T. 12 ROBERTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION VS. TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL 13 CLIFFORD K. MAU, et al. [Code Civ. Proc. § 284(2); Cal. Rules Prof. 14 Conduct, Rule 3-700(B)] Defendants. 15 Date: January 30, 2002 / Time: 2:00 p.m. 16 Dept: 31 17 il,HIAWATHA T. ROBERTS, declare: 18 1. I am the attorney of record for plaintiff Chester Jason in the above-entitled matter. 19 2. I was employed to represent Plaintiff inthis action by a written agreement 20 executed on or about the inception of their joint appearance herein, by the terms of which either 21 party to the agreement was empowered to end the contract and employment relationship upon 22 imely and reasonable notice to the other party to the agreement. Implicit in the agreement was the 23 laintiff s commitment to do all that was reasonably necessary to help me in the preparation of 24 his case for trial, and or to bring the matter to a resolution by settlement, including an agreed 25 easonable compensation plus reimbursement of costs, 26 3. Factors have arisen that permit me to seek the court's authorization to be relieved as 27 counsel for Plaintiff in accordance with the provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 28 3-700, subdivision (C). I am moving under § 284(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure for an order o be relieved as counsel for plaintiff, because plaintiff wishes to terminate my services and either employ another attorney or represent himself. Additional evidence detailing these factors can be set out ina separate supplemental declaration filed under seal for review by the court in camera, ifthe Court so desires. NW I have informed Plaintiff that I intended to withdraw as Counsel of Record inthe above DBD ntitled action pursuant to his wishes.. NN CAO 5. I have also informed the Defendant of my intention to bring this motion. 6. The residence address of each defendant is set forth herein: Defendant Mau: 1305 oO 10 Franklin Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612, and Defendant Collins & Mau LLP: 1305 11 Franklin Street, Suite 300, Oakland, CA 94612. This isconfirmed by the fact that these addresses 12 lhave been the defendants respective addresses from the onset of the Attorney-client relationship, 13 and the address to which we have mailed documents, to which the defendants have responded. 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the 15 foregoing is true and correct. 16 17 18 Dated: January 3, 2002 Law Offices Of Roberts & Stokes 19 20 21 By: Hiawatha T. Roberts, Esq, Attorney for Plaintiff, Chester Jason 22 V/ 23 V// 24 V/ 25 26 27 28