On February 04, 2014 a
Letter,Correspondence
was filed
involving a dispute between
Liu, Li Zhu,
Li Zhu Liu,
and
Alfred Bianchi,
Alfred Bianchi As Trustee Of The Bianchi Trust Dated November 13, 2006,
Lois Bianchi,
Lois Bianchi As Trustee Of The Bianchi Trust Dated November 13, 2006,
for Other PI/PD/WD Tort
in the District Court of Alameda County.
Preview
yt
nn
4 Demand to Quash Case Absent 'Controversy/Jurisdiction'
. To: Wong & Associates Fm: Lois Bianchi
PN 413 Third Street 2403 Bridle Pa
> Jack London Square Gilroy, calorga
a Oakland, CA. 94607 [950A LL
Larry Wong Esq., . NAR 2 4 as |
, CLERK OF
For the last 3 years you/your prior law office have established (claims to wit)By___ st !
a). no ‘controversy’ /valid claim to challenge ‘subject matter jurisdiction’ & venue, | / Deputy
b). no evidence to support your/past/present law office claims re fire origin/guilty party,
c). good faith (numerous harassing phone calls) from your alleged quasi law office,
d). consequent 'fraud' upon the court /by the court to proceed without evidence this
woman never waives 'sworn' statements) claim to challenge‘iimpersonum jurisdiction,’
e). evidence to accept 'Fire Dept.’ report dated 11/19/2014 establishing fire origin was
on Lisa Gallagher property from an indigent ‘fire’,
| f). no evidence to accept the damage was consequently spread to our property at 4601
; Foothill Blvd.,
g). no evidence to rebut per Notice Post Mailings date 1/21/2017 NOW established FACT,
h). no evidence to rebut this woman ‘Judgment’ and per the last page 'Affidavit in Fact For
A Matter on Public Record (you are required to note) this Affidavit was certified by the
w, Superior Court Clerk,
i).no evidence re answers to this woman prior 'discovery' attempts/only ‘collusion’ can be a trial.
Your acceptance (denial) re lack of evidence this woman established 'facts'you/your alleged client —
omission to answer/rebut are (your) now frivolous 'claims.' The latter/above justify you/your claims
are absent legal merit, lawful right. Both you/your client are however responsible/liable from your
past act/actions of falsifying a public [Court] record/elderly abuse and use of the U.S. Mail for ‘fraud’
(e.g. U.S. Mail Fraud). Thus this alleged case (account no. RG-14-712640) of yours is simply
frivolous litigation actions as stated all documents ‘fraudulent securities:' Do you understand?
Thus only an ‘idiot’ would request ‘settlement’ you are however liable for damages as stated hereto.
I hereto 'rebut' all your claims/statements. You/your law office/client are to ¢ease and desist further
harassment. Supported by the above ALL documents are ‘fraudulent securities.' Do you understand?
This demand sent to the 'Presiding Judge’ is to quash this alleged case (no 'controversy'/no ‘due
process' etc.) and to the U.S. Postmaster in Oakland re past elderly abuse/frivolous litigation/ 'fraud'
upon the Court. Your personal aggrandizement/elderly 'shake down'/again your case is neither
legal/lawful.
This woman reserves the right to amend heretofore as sworn statements are forthcoming.
r 5
AorrarkBeanihe 13" Mar. 2017
date
Cc: Presiding Judge, Superior Court, Oakland, CA.
U.S. Postmaster, Oakland CA 94607
, e
'
; : ' NOTICE POST MAILINGS |
TO THE SUPERIOR COURT, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Lois K. Bianchi CASE # RG-14-712640
V. } ' NOTICE PAST MAILINGS
Li Zhu Liu ).
. i,Lois, living woman, with sound mind, and freewill intent; declare that Lawrence Wong of The Law
office of Wong & Hung on behalf for their alleged client Li Zhu Liu pa ‘Plaintiff has to datefailed to
substantiate (via unanswered Discovery’) their litigation against i,alleged non-assumpsit
[Defendant]. Liu/Lawrence FAILURE to answer isprima facie evidence ré act/action(s) of: a).
alsifying a public record, b). fraud upon the Court, c). elderly abuse. Following Discovery Notice(s)
is/are per Post Tracking number(s) as follows:
Tracking number Sent "Received
7016 1379 0000 0873 4443 11/29/2016 Ssvembpenal DAEAN
RETURN
9590 9402 1831 6104 224240 —~RECEIPTs
9402 6102 0088 3258635615 11/22/2016
9402 7102 0079 3188 634073 11/22/2016
9590 9402 1831 6104 224264 RETURN
. RECEIPTs
0402 6102 0088 3258635615 11/21/2016
7015 0640 0000 1498 8052 09/16/2016
9505 5124 1861 6250010070 09/06/2016
9505 5124 1861 6250010063 09/06/2016
9505 5124 1861 6250010056 09/06/2016
9505 5107 2501 6205 008528 07/23/2016
7013 3020 0000 2405 1137 07/18/2016
9505 5124 1863 62000097 70 =: 07/18/2016
U.CC.1-103.6,1-207,1-301,1-308
Dated this 1-21-[F Byf q ; :
ve co . ‘Bianchi ;
care gf:2304 Bridle Path, Gilroy, California Republic
{near 95020] without the United States
_ page 1 of 1 Post Tracking # 7015 0640 0007 88626501. By: Lois: Bianchi.
Document Filed Date
March 24, 2017
Case Filing Date
February 04, 2014
Category
Other PI/PD/WD Tort
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
yt nn 4 Demand to Quash Case Absent 'Controversy/Jurisdiction' . To: Wong & Associates Fm: Lois Bianchi PN 413 Third Street 2403 Bridle Pa > Jack London Square Gilroy, calorga a Oakland, CA. 94607 [950A LL Larry Wong Esq., . NAR 2 4 as | , CLERK OF For the last 3 years you/your prior law office have established (claims to wit)By___ st ! a). no ‘controversy’ /valid claim to challenge ‘subject matter jurisdiction’ & venue, | / Deputy b). no evidence to support your/past/present law office claims re fire origin/guilty party, c). good faith (numerous harassing phone calls) from your alleged quasi law office, d). consequent 'fraud' upon the court /by the court to proceed without evidence this woman never waives 'sworn' statements) claim to challenge‘iimpersonum jurisdiction,’ e). evidence to accept 'Fire Dept.’ report dated 11/19/2014 establishing fire origin was on Lisa Gallagher property from an indigent ‘fire’, | f). no evidence to accept the damage was consequently spread to our property at 4601 ; Foothill Blvd., g). no evidence to rebut per Notice Post Mailings date 1/21/2017 NOW established FACT, h). no evidence to rebut this woman ‘Judgment’ and per the last page 'Affidavit in Fact For A Matter on Public Record (you are required to note) this Affidavit was certified by the w, Superior Court Clerk, i).no evidence re answers to this woman prior 'discovery' attempts/only ‘collusion’ can be a trial. Your acceptance (denial) re lack of evidence this woman established 'facts'you/your alleged client — omission to answer/rebut are (your) now frivolous 'claims.' The latter/above justify you/your claims are absent legal merit, lawful right. Both you/your client are however responsible/liable from your past act/actions of falsifying a public [Court] record/elderly abuse and use of the U.S. Mail for ‘fraud’ (e.g. U.S. Mail Fraud). Thus this alleged case (account no. RG-14-712640) of yours is simply frivolous litigation actions as stated all documents ‘fraudulent securities:' Do you understand? Thus only an ‘idiot’ would request ‘settlement’ you are however liable for damages as stated hereto. I hereto 'rebut' all your claims/statements. You/your law office/client are to ¢ease and desist further harassment. Supported by the above ALL documents are ‘fraudulent securities.' Do you understand? This demand sent to the 'Presiding Judge’ is to quash this alleged case (no 'controversy'/no ‘due process' etc.) and to the U.S. Postmaster in Oakland re past elderly abuse/frivolous litigation/ 'fraud' upon the Court. Your personal aggrandizement/elderly 'shake down'/again your case is neither legal/lawful. This woman reserves the right to amend heretofore as sworn statements are forthcoming. r 5 AorrarkBeanihe 13" Mar. 2017 date Cc: Presiding Judge, Superior Court, Oakland, CA. U.S. Postmaster, Oakland CA 94607 , e ' ; : ' NOTICE POST MAILINGS | TO THE SUPERIOR COURT, ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Lois K. Bianchi CASE # RG-14-712640 V. } ' NOTICE PAST MAILINGS Li Zhu Liu ). . i,Lois, living woman, with sound mind, and freewill intent; declare that Lawrence Wong of The Law office of Wong & Hung on behalf for their alleged client Li Zhu Liu pa ‘Plaintiff has to datefailed to substantiate (via unanswered Discovery’) their litigation against i,alleged non-assumpsit [Defendant]. Liu/Lawrence FAILURE to answer isprima facie evidence ré act/action(s) of: a). alsifying a public record, b). fraud upon the Court, c). elderly abuse. Following Discovery Notice(s) is/are per Post Tracking number(s) as follows: Tracking number Sent "Received 7016 1379 0000 0873 4443 11/29/2016 Ssvembpenal DAEAN RETURN 9590 9402 1831 6104 224240 —~RECEIPTs 9402 6102 0088 3258635615 11/22/2016 9402 7102 0079 3188 634073 11/22/2016 9590 9402 1831 6104 224264 RETURN . RECEIPTs 0402 6102 0088 3258635615 11/21/2016 7015 0640 0000 1498 8052 09/16/2016 9505 5124 1861 6250010070 09/06/2016 9505 5124 1861 6250010063 09/06/2016 9505 5124 1861 6250010056 09/06/2016 9505 5107 2501 6205 008528 07/23/2016 7013 3020 0000 2405 1137 07/18/2016 9505 5124 1863 62000097 70 =: 07/18/2016 U.CC.1-103.6,1-207,1-301,1-308 Dated this 1-21-[F Byf q ; : ve co . ‘Bianchi ; care gf:2304 Bridle Path, Gilroy, California Republic {near 95020] without the United States _ page 1 of 1 Post Tracking # 7015 0640 0007 88626501. By: Lois: Bianchi.