arrow left
arrow right
  • Tirman VS PPH Franchise Holdings, LLC Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Tirman VS PPH Franchise Holdings, LLC Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Tirman VS PPH Franchise Holdings, LLC Unlimited Civil document preview
  • Tirman VS PPH Franchise Holdings, LLC Unlimited Civil document preview
						
                                

Preview

Superior Court of California, County of Alameda Rene C. Davidson Alameda County Courthouse Tirman No. RG19017399 Plaintiff/Petitioner(s) Case Management Order VS. Date: 02/18/2020 PPH Franchise Holdings, LLC Time: 03:00 PM Dept: 23 Defendant/Respondent(s) Judge: Brad Seligman (Abbreviated Title) ORDER re: CASE MANAGEMENT & ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court has ordered the following at the conclusion of a judicially supervised Case Management Conference. FURTHER CONFERENCE A further Case Management Conference isscheduled for 03/03/2020 at 03:00 PM in Dept. 23. Plaintiff and Defense Counsel shall fileUpdated Case Management Statements (preferably jomt) in compliance with CRC § 3.725, preferably on pleading paper rather than on Judicial Council Form CM- 110, no laterthan five(5) court days prior to the CMC. PARTIES ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO SERVE COURTESY COPIES ON THE COURT BECAUSE OF DELAYS IN SCANNING AS A RESULT OF BUDGET SHORTFALLS IN ALAMEDA COUNTY. SANCTIONS Proof having been made to the satisfaction of the court that Plaintiff has failed to: failed to appear at CMC SANCTIONS ARE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: stayed untilthe next Case Management Conference. NOTICES Counsel forDefendant(s) must forthwith serve a copy of this order on allcounsel of record and self- represented parties, and file proof of service. Any delay inthe trial,caused by non-compliance with any order contained herein, shallbe the subject of sanctions pursuant to CCP 177.5. fy | facsimile a i ae Dated: 02/18/2020 Ge VY? Judge Brad Seligman