arrow left
arrow right
  • NONKIN, ANN MARIE v. PESCHEL, MICHAEL Et AlT90 - Torts - All other document preview
  • NONKIN, ANN MARIE v. PESCHEL, MICHAEL Et AlT90 - Torts - All other document preview
  • NONKIN, ANN MARIE v. PESCHEL, MICHAEL Et AlT90 - Torts - All other document preview
  • NONKIN, ANN MARIE v. PESCHEL, MICHAEL Et AlT90 - Torts - All other document preview
  • NONKIN, ANN MARIE v. PESCHEL, MICHAEL Et AlT90 - Torts - All other document preview
  • NONKIN, ANN MARIE v. PESCHEL, MICHAEL Et AlT90 - Torts - All other document preview
						
                                

Preview

DOCKET NO. LLI-CV14-6009898-S SUPERIOR COURT ANN MARIE NONKIN JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF LITCHFIELD VS. AT LITCHFIELD MICHAEL PESCHEL, ET AL SEPTEMBER 21, 2015 MOTION FOR EXPERT TESTIMONY FEE AGAINST DEFENDANT, MICHAEL PESCHEL The Plaintiff in the above-mentioned matter respectfully requests the Court to compel the Defendants, Michael and Judy Peschel to pay for the expert witnesses they deposed for the following ne Te reasons: gS 35 zo 1 On April 17, 2015 the Defendants, Michael and Judy Peschel deposed the Plaintiff's expert a SZ witness, Mr. Richard Calkins. The cost for the expert to be deposed was $2,575.00, of which $1,225.00 was 3 =e Eo 22 for preparation and $1,350.00 was for testimony. To date the Plaintiff has paid $1,287.50 for the expert’s 8E preparation and the Defendants, Michael and Judy Peschel have only paid $337.50 and Defendants UpCountry Services of Sharon, Inc. have paid $337.50 leaving a balance of $612.50 owed to the expert witness, (See Exhibit A attached herein) Counsel for the Defendants Michael and Judy Peschel has indicated that he does not feel that he is responsible for preparation done by the expert witness and that the Defendants’ are not responsible for any further fees. However, as stated above, the Plaintiff promptly paid for all of the preparation time of the expert witness. The balance owed is for testimony not preparation. ORAL ARGUMENT '¢ REQUESTED TESTIMONY 2 REQUIRED Furthermore, the Plaintiff paid for one-half of the entire fee of the Defendants expert witnesses’ deposition, regardless of the amount for the deposition and/or preparation, as agreed to by the parties. 22 Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book § 13-4, the party deposing the expert witness must pay for the deposition cost excluding preparation costs, The Plaintiff promptly paid for all preparation costs of said depositions. The depositions were approximately four months ago, and despite numerous requests from the Plaintiffs attorney the Defendants, Michael and Judy Peschel have failed to fully pay the experts for their time given for testimony. ud gs Se 33