arrow left
arrow right
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
  • David Cardinal  vs.  Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC, et al(23) Unlimited Other PI/PD/WD document preview
						
                                

Preview

CM-110 AfiORNEY 0R PARTY wrrHOUT ATrORNEY (Name, and mus).- State Bar number, Fon counr use ONLY Richard H. Dalrymple, III, 197839 LAW OFFICES OF LARRY S . BUCKLEY ElEctrunically 1660 Humboldt Road, Suite 5 Supamr MSan Court cfiallfarmafinunry lumen- Chico I Cal i fornia 9 5 92 8 h1- mepnoueuo; (530) 343-3695 FAx~0_(oM.- (530) 343—3110 0“ 10/22/2019 EMAIL Aonaessmpaonal): By £5! fli Shafl Lg DaVid ArrORNEY FOR (Name).- Cardinal MP“? Chi SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF san Mateo STREETADDRESS: 400 County Center MAILINGADDRESS: CITYANDZIPCODE: Redwood City, CA 94063 BRANCHNAME: Civil Division PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: David Cardinal DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC; James Williams CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT CAsE NUMBER; (Check one): m UNLIMITED CASE (Amount demanded D LIMITED CASE (Amount demanded is$25,000 1 9—CIV— 0 4 0 7 7 exceeds $25,000) or less) A CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE is scheduled as follows: Date: November 15 , 2Ol9 Time: 9: 00 a .m. Dept.: ll Div.: Room: Address of court from the address above): (if different m Notice of Intent to Appear by Telephone, by (name): Richard H . Dalrymple , III INSTRUCTIONS: Allapplicable boxes must be checked, and the specified information must be provided. 1. Party or parties (answer one): a. b. m D This statement This statement is is submitted by party (name): Plainti submitted jointly by parties (names): ff David Cardinal 2. Complaint and cross-com plaint (to be answered by plaintifis and cmss-complainants only) a. The complaint was filed on (date): July l7 , 2019 b. D The cross-complaint, if any, was filed on (date): 3. Service (tobe answered by plaintiffs and cmss-complainants only) a. b. m D named in the complaint and cross-complaint have been served, have appeared. or have been dismissed. All parties The followingparties named inthe complaint or cross-complaint (1) D have not been served (specify names and explain why not): (2) D have been served but have not appeared and have not been dismissed (specify names): (3) D have had a default entered against them (specify names): c. D The may be added following additional parties they may be served): (specify names, nature of involvement in case, and the date by which 4. Description of case a. Type of case General in m negligence. complaint D cross-complaint (Describe, includingcauses of action): Page1 of 5 Formdida wagraMwatl “Cahggnlllase CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Carll-‘gnggogygo CM—110 (Rev. July 1.2011] www.courtsmgov Cardinal, David CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERZDaVid Cardinal CASENUMBER: 19-CIV-04077 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC James Williams 4. b. Provide a brief statement of the case.includingany damages. (prersonal injury damages are sought, specify the injuryand damages claimed, including medical expenses to date flndicate source and amount], estimated future medical expenses, lost earnings to date, and estimated future lost eamings.lfequitable reliefis sought,describe the nature ofthe relief.) Defendants failed to tighten the handlebar bolts on Plaintiff's motorcycle resulting in the mmmmmfimmmmmmwmmmWMmMMfimmmmm including, but not limited to, a left femur fracture requiring surgery and injuries to his left hand and fingers. Plaintiff's past medical expenses are over $200,000.00. Discovery is continuing D (lfmorespaceisneeded, checkthisboxandattachapagedesignatedasAttachment4b.) as to future medical expenses and past and future lost 5. Juryornonjurytrial wages. Thepartyorpartiesrequest m ajurytrial D anonjurytrial. (Ifmorethanonepany,providethenameofeachparty requestingajurytrial): 6. Trialdate a. D The trialhas been setfor (date): b. m No trialdate has been set. This case willbe readyfor within trial 12 months ofthe date of the filing ofthe complaint (if not,explain): c. Dates on which parties or attorneys willnot be available for (specify dates trial and explain reasons forunavailability): 12/09/19; 01/14/20; 02/18/20; 03/02/20; 03/16/20; 03/23/20; 05/04/20; 05/18/20; 06/01/20; 06/08/20; 06/15/20; 06/29/20; 07/13/20; 07/20/20; 08/03/20; 08/17/20; 08/24/20; 08/31/20; 09/21/20; 09/22/20; 03/04/21 - 7. Estimatedlengthotmal due to other trials. The party or parties estimate that the will trial take (checkone): a. m days(specifynumber): 2-3 b. D hours (shortcauses) (specify): 8. Trial representation (tobe answered foreach party) The partyorparties willbe represented attrial m bythe attomeyor party listedinthe caption D bythefollowing: a. Attorney: b. Firm: c. Address: d. Telephonenumber: f. Faxnumber: e. E-mailaddress: g. Panyrepresented: U Additionalrepresentation isdescribed in Attachment 8. 9. Preference D This case isentitledto preference (specify code section): 10. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) a. ADR information package. Please note that ADR different processes are available in and communities; read different courts theADR information package provided by the court under rule 3.221 for informationabout the processes available through the mun and community programs inthiscase. (1) Forpaniesrepresentedbycounsel:Counsel mhas DhasnotprovidedtheADRinformationpackageidentified inrule 3.221to the clientand reviewed ADR options with the client. (2) ForseIf-representedpanieszParty Dhas DhasnotreviewedtheADRinformationpackageidentifiedinrule3.221. b. Referral to judicial arbitration or civil action mediation(ifavailable). (1) D This matter issubject to mandatoryjudicial arbitration under Code Procedure section 1141 of Civil .11 or to action civil mediation under of Code Procedure section 1775.3 because the amount of Civil incontroversy does not exceed the statutorylimit. (2) D Plaintiff elects case to refer this and agrees to judicial arbitration to recovery to the amount specified limit inCode of CivilProcedure section 1141.11. (3) D This case is exempt from judicial under arbitration rule 3.811of the CaliforniaRules of Court orfrom action civil mediation under Code of Civil Procedure section 1775 et seq. (specify exemption): cwwIRev.JuIy1.2om CASEMANAGEMENTSTATEMENT Pagan” 'Essenfld C «hm EM? Cardinal, David CM410 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONERIDaVid Cardinal _ CASE NUMBER: l9-CIV-04077 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC James Williams 10. c. Indicate the ADR process or processes that the party or parties arewilling to participate in.have agreed toparticipatein,or have already participated in {check allthat applyand provide the specified information): The patty or parties completing Ifthe party or parties completing this form inthe case have agreed to thisformarewillingto have already completed an participate in or ADR process or processes, participate inthe followingADR indicate the status of the processes (attach a copy of the parties'ADR processes (check allthatapply): stipulation): m Mediation session not yet scheduled (1)Mediation m U Mediation session scheduled for (date): D Agreed tocomplete mediation by (date): U Mediation completed on (date): m Settlement conference not yet scheduled (2) Settlement D Settlement conference scheduled for (date): conference D Agreed to complete settlement conference by (date): U Settlement conference completed on (date): D Neutralevaluation not yet scheduled (3) Neutralevaluation D U Neutral evaluationscheduled for (date): D Agreed to complete neutral evaluation by (date): D Neutral evaluation completed on (date): D Judicial arbitration not yet scheduled (4) Nonbindingjudicial D D Judicial arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration D Agreed to completejudicial arbitrationby (date): U Judicial arbitration completed on (date): D Private arbitrationnot yet scheduled (5)Binding private D D Private arbitration scheduled for (date): arbitration D Agreed to complete private arbitrationby (date): D Private arbitration completed on (date): D ADR session not yet scheduled (6)0ther(specify): D D ADR session scheduled for (date): D Agreed tocomplete ADR session by (date): D ADR completed on (date): CMHMMHthHI CASEMANAGEMENTSTATEMENT Pwnas 'Essentia Cardinal, David CM-110 _ PLAINTIFF/PEmIONEazDavid Cardinal cAsENUMBEn; 19-CIV-04077 DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC; James Williams 11. Insurance a. D Insurance carrier, ifany, for party filing this statement (name): b. Reservationofrights: D Yes D No c. D Coverage issues significantly affect resolution will of thiscase (explain): 12. Jurisdiction Indicateany matters that may affect the court's jurisdiction or processing of this case and describe the status. D Bankruptcy U Other((specify): Status: 13. Related cases, consolidation, and coordination a. D There are companion, underlying, or related cases. (1) Nameofcase: (2) Nameofcoun: (3) Casenumber: (4) Status: D Additionalcases are descn'bed inAttachment 13a. b. D Amotionto D consolidate D coordinate Mllbefiledbymameparty): 14. Bifurcation D The party or parties intend to file a motion for an order bifurcating, severing. or coordinating the followingissues or causes of action (specifymoving party,type ofmotion, andreasons): 15. Othermotions m The party or patties expect to file the following motions before trial(specifymoving party,type ofmotion, and issues): Usual motions in limine. 16. Discovery a. D The party or partieshave completed discovery. all b. m The followingdiscovery willbe completed by the date specified (describe allanticipated discovery): M MM flat; Plaintiff Written Discovery Per Code Plaintiff Party/Witness Depositions Per Code Plaintiff Expert Depositions Per Code c. D The following discovery issues,including issues regarding the discovery of electronically stored information, are anticipated(specify): cwwtkevvJuIynzmn CASEMANAGEMENTSTATEMENT MM” Cardinal, David CM-110 PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: David Cardinal meuumsm 19-CIV-04077 DEFENDANTIRESPONDENT: Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC; James Williams 17. Economiclitigation a. D This is a case limited civil the (i.e., amount demanded is$25,000 or less) and the economic procedures litigation in Code of Civil Procedure sections 9098 willapply to this case. b. D This is alimited case and a motion to withdraw the case from the civil economic procedures or litigation for additional discovery willbe filed (ifchecked, explain specifically why economic procedures relating litigation to discovery ortn'al should not apply to this case): 18. Otherissues D The party or parties requestthatthe following additionalmatters be considered or determined atthe case management conference {specify}: 19. Meetandconfer a. D The party or partieshave met and conferred with allparties on allsubjects required by rule 3.724 of the California Rules of Court {ifnot explain): b. Afler meeting and conferring as required rule3.724 of the California Rules of Conn. the parties agree on by the following (specify): 20. am Totalnumberofpagesattached(ifany): completely familiar with this case and l__ l willbe fullyprepared to discuss the status of discovery and alternative dispute resolution, as well as oiher issues raised by1his statement. and willpossess the authon‘tyto enter on these issues into stipulations at thetime of the case management conference, including the written authority of the party where required. Date: October 22, 2019 (TYPEORPRMNME) (TYPE ORPRlNT NAME) (SIGNATUREOFPARTYORATFORNEY) D Additional signatures are attached. cu-uotaevJuwmu CASEMANAGEMENTSTATEMENT W0” , E H 9% Elm Cardinal, David Re: Cardinal v. CatalystReaction Tuning, LLC, elal. Case No. 19-CIV-04077 PROOF 0F SERVICE 1am employed inthe County 0f Butte, State of Californi a. Iamoverthe age of 18 andnot gpsrtytothewithinaction. Mybusincssaddxessis 1660Humb01dtRo ad,SuiteS, Chico, California 5 28. 0n this date, I served the foregoing document (s): PLAINTIFF’S CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT on the partyfies) identified below, addresse d as follows: Catalyst Reaction Tuning, LLC James Williams 870 Bransten Road San Carlos,CA94070 The following is the manner in which service of the document(s) was effected: _X_ First Class Mail (Iam familiar with my firm’s practice for collectin g and processing correspondence for mailing with the United States Post Service. Inthe ordinary course of business, correspondence is deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day such correspondence is collected. Iplaced atrue and correct copy of the document(s) listed above in a sealed envelope addressed as shown above with postage thereon fully prepaid for collection and mailing on this date, following ordinary business practices .) __ OvernightExpressService(Bydepositin gahueandcorrectcopyofthe document(s) listed above in asealed envelope or package addresse d as shown 17 above with delivery fees paid in a box regularly maintained by Federal Express for overnight delivery.) 18 19 _ FacsimileTransmission(Byuseoffacsim 343-3 1 10, I served atrue ilemachinetelephonenumber(530) and correct copy of the document(s) listed above on the addressee and facsimile number shown above by transmitting via facsimile 20 machine on this date before 5:00 pm.) 21 _ PersonalServioe (Bypersonallydeliveringa documents(s) listed above ina sealed envelope to the trueandcorrectcopyofthe addressee shown above.) 22 [declare under penalty ofperjury under the law ofthe State of California that the foregoing 23 istrue and correct. 24 Executed on October 22, 2019, at Chico, California. 25 26 éuziePatterson 27 28