On December 29, 2003 a
Request,Application
was filed
involving a dispute between
Travelers Casualty And Surety Company Of America, A Connecticut Corporation,
and
Alfred Antonini,
Alva Antonini,
Texas Valla Real Estate I, Inc., A Texas Corporation,
Wellington La Peak, Inc., Texas Corporation,
for Limited Civil
in the District Court of Alameda County.
Preview
ATTORNEY
Dean
ORPARTY WITHOUT
P.:Sperding
ATTORNEY (Name,
@ number,
andaddress): o— FC
wun
—.,
[-LAW OFFICE OF DEAN P. SPERLING
201 E. Sandpointe Avenue
Suite 220
Santa Ana, CA 92707-5742
TELEPHONENO.: (714) 438-8090 FAXNO.(Optional):
E-MAIL
ADDRESS (Optional):
ATTORNEY FOR(Name) Plaintiff
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Alameda
STREETADDRESS: 24405 Amador Street
MAILING
ADDRESS: .
CITYANDZIPCODE: Hayward, CA 94544
BRANCHNAME: Hayward Hall of Justice
PLAINTIFF: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation,
DEFENDANT: ALFRED ANTONINI, individual; ALVA ANTONIN
~ | CASENUMBER:
JUDGMENT
(_] By Clerk By Default [_] After Court Trial HGO3133859
Lx] By Court [__] On Stipulation [__] Defendant Did Not
; . Appear at Trial
JUDGMENT
means BY DEFAULT
a. Defendant was properlyserved witha copy ofthe summons and complaint.
b. Defendant failedtoanswer the complaint or appear and defend the action withinthe time alloweddby law.
c. Defendant's default was entered by the clerkupon plaintiffs
application.
d. L__] Clerk's Judgment (Code Civ. Proc.,§ 585(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contractor judginent ofa court of
"this state forthe recovery of money.
. CX] Court Judgment (Code Civ. Proc.,§ 585(b)). The court considered
oO
(1) | plaintiffs
testimony and other evidence.
(2) plaintiff's
written declaration(Code Civ. Proc.,§ 585(d).
2, (] ON STIPULATION
a. Plaintiff
and defendant agreed (stipulated)
that a judgment be entered inthiscase. The courtapproved the stipulated.
judgment and
b. [_] the signed writtenstipulationwas filedinthe case.
[] the stipulationwas stated inopen court [__] the stipulation
was stated on the record.
Ww.
. [| AFTER COURT TRIAL. The jury was waived. The courtconsidered the evidence.
a. The case was triedon (dateand time):
before (name of judicial
officer):
b. Appearances by:
{___] Plaintiff
(name each): E C () Piaintitrsattorney(name each):
(1) E | VV E D (1) ,
(2) SEP 9
2) |
7 2004
CL] Continued on Attachment % ;
y .
[_"] Defendant (name each): ALAMEDA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT [__] Defendant's attorney (name each):
(1) (1)
(2) » (2)
["_] Continued on Attachment 3b. ,
[] Defendant did notappear at trial.Defendant was properlyserved withnotice oftrial.
d. [__] Astatement of decision (Code Civ.Proc.,§ 632) [ ]wasnot [_ ] was requested.
; - Page1 of 2
Bee eee eam use . JUDGMENT schitians Cadeof OwProcedure,
§§585,
664.6 ;
JUD-100
[NewJanuary
1, 2002] hus
LNawoanr lzooz
"| Aenuer
man}
oot-anr
7107abeg .
Ayndag ' Aq ‘x4819
":91eq
"ENOD OY] UlAji}UO JUaWHpn! jeulBUO ayy yoAdoo anu)e Stsiyyyeu AjIWaO | /
(feuondo) ALWOIdILYAD S,.MYA19 fas)
A\ndaq Aq aia [| eq
wao1dsOTwDIANt ,
“LJ ‘aed
‘(Ayoads) nO [] v2
¢ sae} Aouioye pue $ sao} Aguioye pue
mo $ s}S09 . $ sjsoo
J9A008J 0} PG WA}! U]paweU jUepUajep-ssalD [| J8AOD1 0} GG Wa}! UlPoWWeU JUBPUajog ]
"PGWa}! Ul PaweuU JURPUdJap-ssSOlO ‘qG Wa}! Ulpaweu
wou Bulyjou anledel 0}JUBUIE}dWIO9-Ss019 fe JUEPUjap Woy Buiujou sAleoed 0}yNUIel Lj q
$ WLOL (9) OO'T6E'6T $ W1LOL (9)
$s -(Apioads)ayo «[__] (s) . $ ‘(Ayoads) uO [__]_ (s)
8 sjsop [_] () Oo'6RE — F S809 (r)
$ saajAouoyy [| (¢) O9°EPL’s = ¢ _ sae) ABUONY CX] (e)
% jO ayesjenuue. me % OT sO oye jenuue
au) JeJSQazU! ~BY} 3 Sela}U!
$ yuaw6pniaig [—] (2) op oes’e § -weubpniaid [X] (2)
$ sebeweq [| (t) 00°89R'ZT ¢ seBewed [xX] (1)
"JuIe|dWO9-SSOl9 SU} UO JUBUIe}dWOo-ssol9 sjure|dwoo au} uO YHUIE|d Aed
Aed ysnw saoge 9g way u| poweu Juepuajap-ssolg ff] 'o ysnw aaoge eG Wad}Ui palweU jUBpUajag ‘2
yJunowy 9
,:(yoee auseu) yUePUayap-SSOI9 JO} [~~] “Pp “(yoee auleu) JUePUaap 404 [_] 4
"9GJUaWYDeVY UO penuUuOD [_Uptaezodzoo SexdL SOUT 1 ‘Syma Pe IVROLENTEIO penywarpdzod>
‘oul
SexeaL e& ‘I 3LVLSa Twae WITWA SVX@L
a !TENPTATpUt ‘ININOLNY WATW ‘TRenptaATtpuT
:(yoRa aweu) JUePUdjJap-sso1D ysUIeEBepuUe ‘ININOLNY Gaua Ty 7(Ssaweu)juepuajep ysuleBe pue
‘uotqerzodaz059 ynoTAoOSsuUOD
a
WOIYEWY JO ANVdUWOD ALANS CNV
:(yoea aweu) JUBLIB|GWOD-SSOld JO} C_] ie) ALTWASYO SUA TEAVUL ‘(yoes aweu) ynurejd 410 e
sijuow6pnp ‘sapeg ‘Ss
‘somed aul Jouojejndiys ayy 0} Buipsoooe pasajua siyusuuHpnr “yuawbpne payejndys [_] 'p
MY3IOSHL [] = LUNOD HL [X] ‘Ag SMO71104 SV GSYSLNZ SI LNAWOOaNr
Tee
“ININOLINY WATY ‘TeENPTATPUT ‘ININOLNWY CSuYaTW ‘iNvaNa430
6S8CETECOOH ‘uotTzer0dz0D yNoTADauUdD e “WOINEWy |
MEEWAN SSD _JO ANVdWOD ALAYUNS GNV ALTWASWO SUBTHAVUL ‘sslNivid
Document Filed Date
September 27, 2004
Case Filing Date
December 29, 2003
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.