arrow left
arrow right
  • MANTILLA, KATHERINEE C v. MENCIO, DREW R Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
  • MANTILLA, KATHERINEE C v. MENCIO, DREW R Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
  • MANTILLA, KATHERINEE C v. MENCIO, DREW R Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
  • MANTILLA, KATHERINEE C v. MENCIO, DREW R Et AlV01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s) document preview
						
                                

Preview

DOCKET NO. CV UWY -18-6041232 SUPERIOR COURT KATHERINE C. MANTILLA JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF WATERBURY V. AT WATERBURY DREW R. MENCIO ET AL APRIL 6, 2021 OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR NONSUIT Pursuant to Connecticut Practice Book, the plaintiff objects to defendant's Motion for Order of Compliance dated March 10, 2021. � � N • Defendants were given undated HIPPAA compliant medical authorizations with initial i . s discovery responses dated July 31, 2018. Nevertheless, plaintiff has this day, sent via e-mail, 0 0 N 0 fax and U.S. mail additional authorizations . 0 0 � a:, 0 • Plaintiff has complied and provided the defendant with supplemental compliance upon a:, � 0 ::::, N receipt as well, as followed up with the defendant's counsel to assist in addressing any further missing medical documentation, to no response. • Additionally, plaintiffs counsel has requested the records which defendants are seeking and will disclose them upon receipt. Plaintiff has complied with all requests of Interrogatories per Connecticut Practice Book §§13-7(a)(2) and 13-IO(a)(2). Furthermore, a trial date has not been scheduled in this matter at this time. WHEREFORE, the plaintiff objects to the Motion for Non-Suit and seeks costs of this Motion and a reasonable attorney's fee. The Plaintiff, James K. Smith, Esq.