On February 28, 2020 a
Answer
was filed
involving a dispute between
Linda Doak,
and
Carol Rogers,
Scott Rogers,
for V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
in the District Court of New London County.
Preview
DOCKET NO.: KNL-CV-20-6045526-S : SUPERIOR COURT
LINDA DOAK : J.D. OF NEW LONDON
v. : AT NEW LONDON
SCOTT ROGERS, ET AL. : APRIL 7, 2020
ANSWER
1. The defendants lack sufficient knowledge and information upon which to base a
belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 1 and therefore leave the plaintiff
to her proof.
2. The allegations contained in paragraph 2 are admitted.
3. The defendants admit so much of paragraph 3 as alleges that the defendant Carol
Rogers was involved in a motor vehicle collision. So much of this paragraph as alleges that
Carol Rogers caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages is denied. As for the remaining
allegations contained in this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient knowledge and information
upon which to base a belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof.
4. The allegations contained in paragraph 4 are admitted.
5. The allegations contained in paragraph 5 are denied.
6. The defendants deny so much of paragraph 6 as alleges that the defendant Carol
Rogers was careless and/or negligent in the operation of the subject vehicle. The defendants
further deny that the defendant, Carol Rogers, caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. As for
the remaining allegations contained in this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient information
and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to
her proof.
7. The defendants deny so much of paragraph 7 as alleges defendant Carol Rogers’s
negligence. The defendants further deny that defendant Carol Rogers caused the plaintiff’s
injuries and damages. As for the remaining allegations contained in this paragraph, the
defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to their
truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof.
8. The defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a
belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 8, and therefore leave the plaintiff
to her proof.
9. The defendants deny so much of paragraph 9 as implies that defendant Carol
Rogers caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. As for the remaining allegations contained in
this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a
belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof.
10. The defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a
belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 10 and therefore leave the plaintiff
to her proof.
2
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
THE DEFENDANTS,
SCOTT ROGERS and CAROL ROGERS
By: /s/ #420759
Andi Hallier
RICCIO & BELETSKY, LLC
500 East Main Street, Suite 324
Branford, Connecticut 06405
Juris No.: 417172
Tel.: (203)433-4311
Fax: (203)433-4781
Email: andi@riccio-beletsky.com
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that a copy of the above was or will immediately be mailed or delivered
electronically or nonelectronically on this 7th day of April, 2020 to all counsel and self-
represented parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received from
all counsel and self-represented parties of record who were or will immediately be electronically
served.
Bart A. Sayet, Esq.
SAYET & SEDER
P.O. Box 128
Norwich, Connecticut 06360
/s/ #420759
Andi Hallier
Commissioner of the Superior Court
3
Document Filed Date
April 07, 2020
Case Filing Date
February 28, 2020
Category
V01 - Vehicular - Motor Vehicles - Driver and/or Passenger(s) vs. Driver(s)
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
DOCKET NO.: KNL-CV-20-6045526-S : SUPERIOR COURT LINDA DOAK : J.D. OF NEW LONDON v. : AT NEW LONDON SCOTT ROGERS, ET AL. : APRIL 7, 2020 ANSWER 1. The defendants lack sufficient knowledge and information upon which to base a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 1 and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 2. The allegations contained in paragraph 2 are admitted. 3. The defendants admit so much of paragraph 3 as alleges that the defendant Carol Rogers was involved in a motor vehicle collision. So much of this paragraph as alleges that Carol Rogers caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages is denied. As for the remaining allegations contained in this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient knowledge and information upon which to base a belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 4. The allegations contained in paragraph 4 are admitted. 5. The allegations contained in paragraph 5 are denied. 6. The defendants deny so much of paragraph 6 as alleges that the defendant Carol Rogers was careless and/or negligent in the operation of the subject vehicle. The defendants further deny that the defendant, Carol Rogers, caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. As for the remaining allegations contained in this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 7. The defendants deny so much of paragraph 7 as alleges defendant Carol Rogers’s negligence. The defendants further deny that defendant Carol Rogers caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. As for the remaining allegations contained in this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 8. The defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 8, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 9. The defendants deny so much of paragraph 9 as implies that defendant Carol Rogers caused the plaintiff’s injuries and damages. As for the remaining allegations contained in this paragraph, the defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to their truth, and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 10. The defendants lack sufficient information and knowledge upon which to base a belief as to the truth of the allegations contained in paragraph 10 and therefore leave the plaintiff to her proof. 2 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, THE DEFENDANTS, SCOTT ROGERS and CAROL ROGERS By: /s/ #420759 Andi Hallier RICCIO & BELETSKY, LLC 500 East Main Street, Suite 324 Branford, Connecticut 06405 Juris No.: 417172 Tel.: (203)433-4311 Fax: (203)433-4781 Email: andi@riccio-beletsky.com CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that a copy of the above was or will immediately be mailed or delivered electronically or nonelectronically on this 7th day of April, 2020 to all counsel and self- represented parties of record and that written consent for electronic delivery was received from all counsel and self-represented parties of record who were or will immediately be electronically served. Bart A. Sayet, Esq. SAYET & SEDER P.O. Box 128 Norwich, Connecticut 06360 /s/ #420759 Andi Hallier Commissioner of the Superior Court 3