arrow left
arrow right
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
  • MICROCHECK SYSTEMS INC (TEXAS CORPORATION) vs. ZIGROSSI & MURPHY L L C (TEXAS CORPORATION) (IND A INJUNCTION document preview
						
                                

Preview

wpe 12/19/2887 12:08 2819701F"4 LAW OFFICES PAGE 05/16 Cause No. 2004-59790 MICROCHECK SYSTEMS, INC. ‘ IN THE DIsTRAP ADR cpp Dr AND EDUCATED SYSTEMS rosa CHENG & SOLUTIONS, INC. Theremat Clerk 0 Plaintiffs 19 mut \o7 14- Vs. DEC MURPHY, nannis counAae ZIGROSSI & LLC. Cae) NT TEXAS —— EDUCATED SOLUTIONS, ta FROST BANK, TEXAS, ) CHRIS ZIGROSSI, SCOTT MURPHY, Sy MIKE SMITH, JIM HAYDEN, : ALEX CAMPBELL, and 1002 6T 33d . ” Defendants ' 125™ JUDICIAL HARB, DEFENDANT, SCOTT MURPHY’S SECOND APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND SCOTT MURPHY’S ANSWER BEYOND THE DOCKET CONTROL TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COMES, SCOTT MURPHY, (hereinafter referred to as “Murphy”) one of the Defendants in the referenced and titled cause, and files this his Motion for Application for Leave to file a Second Amended Answer beyond the docket contro! cut-off and in support of same would respectfully show the Court the following: 1. The Court recently held a Summary Judgment hearing on December 3, 2007. 2. Subject to that hearing, the Court has granted an Interlocutory Order granting Summary Judgment against Scott Murphy and also granting Partial Summary Judgment denying certain affirmative defenses alleged on behalf of Scott Murphy, 3. As a result of the Court’s ruling and the rapid pace of change in this suit, Scott Murphy has new affirmative defenses that were specifically given rise to by the Court's ruling on December 3, 2007. 4, The truth of the matter is that at this point Scott Murphy js unclear as to whether this case is operating under a docket control order which would act to limit this amended 1 : EMORANDUM 4 Ps phthe time of ~12/19/2087 12:08 281970154 LAW OFFICES PAGE 6/16 ay answer or not. Scott Murphy therefore files this application for leave out of an abundance of caution. 5. Further, this amended pleading is permissible pursuant to Rule 63 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, as this case is currently on the Trial Docket for January 14, 2008, will not present any surprise to Plaintiffs, and would serve in equity and justice. WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant, Scott Murphy prays that this Application for Leave be granted and that he be allowed to file his Second Amended Original Answer. hy 4 . Respectfully submitted, ee . J. Reid Perry, Attorney at Law 12850 Jones Road #201 Houston, TX 77070 Tel: (281) 970-417512/19/2087 12:88 2819701 LAW OFFICES PAGE 87/16 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Thave been unsuccessful in my attempt to contact the Plaintiffs attorneys regarding this Motion for Application for Leave to Amend Scott Murphy’s Second Amended Answer Beyond the Docket Control Cut-Off. I have been successful in my attempt to contact Defendant Mike Smith’s attorney regarding this Motion for Application for Leave to Amend Scott Murphy’s Second Amended Answer Beyond the Docket Control Cut-Off, and he is not opposed. Thave been successful in my attempt to contact Defendant MiChoice’s attorney regarding this Motion for Application for Leave to Amend Scott Murphy’s Second Amended Answer Beyond the Docket Control Cut-Off, and he is not opposed. _-12/19/2887 12:88 2813701 mq LAW OFFICES PAGE 28/16 CER’ CATE OF SE) I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Defendant, Scott Murphy’s, MOTION FOR APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND SCOTT MURPHY’S SECOND ANSWER BEYOND THE DOCKET CONTROL CUT-OFF has been forwarded to all Counsel of Record, by fax and first class mail on December 5A 2007. a Copy to: Christopher D, DeMeo State Bar No. 00796456 2500 Two Houston Center Fannin Houston, Texas 77010 713-951-1000 713-951-1199 — fax Murphy, Ii igs Wehee Road #201 Houston, Texas 77070 281-807-4400 281-970-1664 — fax David Petersen 8303 SW Freeway #810 713-779-8648 - faxsome -12/19/2007 12:88 | 2849781 5m LAW OFFICES ' “o¢ 1 J. REID PERRY Attomey at Law 12850 Jones Road, Suite 201 Houston, Texas 77070 www Jreidperrylaw.com December 19, 2007 Ms. Theresa Chang Harris County District Clerk 1115 Congress Houston, Texas 77002 Re: Cause No. 2004-59790; Microcheck Systems, Inc. and Educated Inc. vs. Zigre: County, Texas Dear Ms. Chang: Please file the enclosed: 1) Notice of Submission 2) Murphy’s Answer Beyond the Docket Control Cut-Off 3) Order 4) Defendant, Scott Murphy’s Second Amended Original Answer Please file and retum a file stamped copy to me. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Very truly yo J. Reid P IJRP:lr Enclosure cc: Chuistopher D, DeMeo: Via fax 713-951-1199 ce: ; Via hand ce: Devid P. Petersen, Via fax 713-775-8648 Defendant, Scott Murphy’s Second Application for Leave to Amend ms and Solutions, ANG E Was maui dec 19 PM 2 29 A \ OGG. Seott Aor. wios63 wees tnt ee EO HAR Telephone: 231-970-4175 Fax: 281-970-1664 ireldperrviaw@sbeslobal net ssi & Murphy, LLC, et al; In the 125th Judicial District Court of Harris PAGE 82/16 DEPUTY BY.