On November 26, 2019 a
Order
was filed
involving a dispute between
Runyon, Nathan Peter,
and
Does 1-50, Inclusive,
Ng, Kaiser,
Payward, Inc., A California Corporation,
for civil
in the District Court of San Francisco County.
Preview
oe NY DH FF YW YN
eee a i
BNRRRBRBRRBESEeSEVWTABDEBESS
CLAIRE E. COCHRAN (SBN 222529)
GREGORY W. STEVENS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
LAW OFFICES OF CLAIRE COCHRAN, P.C.
100 PINE STREET, SUITE 1250
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 .
TELEPHONE: (415) 580- 6019
FACSIMILE: (415) 745- 3301
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Nathan Peter Runyon
Pbeontidiog!
AUG 262021
ON, OF es COURT
BY:
Deputy Clerk
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
INATHAN PETER RUNYON,
Plaintiff,
v.
PAY WARD, INC., a California Corporation
d/b/a KRAKEN; and KAISER NG an
individual and DOES 1-50, inclusive,
Defendant.
CASE NO, CGC-19-581099
[IP ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL
Date: Augush, 2021
Time 9:30 a.m.
Dept.: 302
Judge: The Hon. Ethan P. Schulman
Action Filed: November 26, 2019
Trial Date: September 13, 2021
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEALCo mnt nu F&F BW HH =
NY Ny oN NON ee a sa a a
Ear Bt telly declrsby hap
Defendants’ unopposed motion to seal/is granted. The court finds that (1) there exists an
overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the records, (2) the overriding interest
supports sealing the records, (3) a substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be
prejudiced if the records are not sealed, (4) the proposed sealing is narrowly tailored and (5) no less
restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. (California Rules of Court, rule 2.550.)
So Ordered
Hy Hen
EN sok —
Hon. Ethan P. Schulman
JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT
2 \
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL
Document Filed Date
August 26, 2021
Case Filing Date
November 26, 2019
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
oe NY DH FF YW YN eee a i BNRRRBRBRRBESEeSEVWTABDEBESS CLAIRE E. COCHRAN (SBN 222529) GREGORY W. STEVENS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) LAW OFFICES OF CLAIRE COCHRAN, P.C. 100 PINE STREET, SUITE 1250 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111 . TELEPHONE: (415) 580- 6019 FACSIMILE: (415) 745- 3301 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Nathan Peter Runyon Pbeontidiog! AUG 262021 ON, OF es COURT BY: Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO INATHAN PETER RUNYON, Plaintiff, v. PAY WARD, INC., a California Corporation d/b/a KRAKEN; and KAISER NG an individual and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendant. CASE NO, CGC-19-581099 [IP ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL Date: Augush, 2021 Time 9:30 a.m. Dept.: 302 Judge: The Hon. Ethan P. Schulman Action Filed: November 26, 2019 Trial Date: September 13, 2021 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEALCo mnt nu F&F BW HH = NY Ny oN NON ee a sa a a Ear Bt telly declrsby hap Defendants’ unopposed motion to seal/is granted. The court finds that (1) there exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the records, (2) the overriding interest supports sealing the records, (3) a substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the records are not sealed, (4) the proposed sealing is narrowly tailored and (5) no less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest. (California Rules of Court, rule 2.550.) So Ordered Hy Hen EN sok — Hon. Ethan P. Schulman JUDGE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT 2 \ [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL