On December 31, 2018 a
Judgment
was filed
involving a dispute between
Energy Capital Credit Union,
and
Maier, Theodore Joseph,
for Contract Consumer/Comm/Debt >$100,000 but <$200,000
in the District Court of Montgomery County.
Preview
RECEIVED AND FILED
FOR RECORD
August 23, 2019 1:45 PM
Melisa Miller, District Clerk
Montgomery County, Texas
CAUSE NO. 18-12-17053
ENERGY CAPITAL CREDIT UNION § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF
§
VS. § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS
§
THEODORE JOSEPH MAIER § 284TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
ORDER AT DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION DOCKET
On this day, a regular day in the term of this Court, came to be heard the Court’s Motion
to Dismiss the above-styled and numbered case for lack of prosecution.
It is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:
_____ 1. The Court’s Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution is reset for hearing on
__________________________, 2019, at 8:30 AM.
x
_____ 2. No party seeking affirmative relief to said suit appeared, and the Court, having
considered the facts surrounding same, finds that this cause of action should be dismissed for
lack of prosecution; therefore it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-
styled and numbered cause is dismissed, and same is hereby removed for the docket of this
Court.
Signed this on this the 23rd day of August, 2019
________________________________
Judge Presiding
Minute
27th of August, 2019
Document Filed Date
August 23, 2019
Case Filing Date
December 31, 2018
Category
Contract Consumer/Comm/Debt >$100,000 but <$200,000
For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/.
Preview
RECEIVED AND FILED FOR RECORD August 23, 2019 1:45 PM Melisa Miller, District Clerk Montgomery County, Texas CAUSE NO. 18-12-17053 ENERGY CAPITAL CREDIT UNION § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF § VS. § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, TEXAS § THEODORE JOSEPH MAIER § 284TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT ORDER AT DISMISSAL FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION DOCKET On this day, a regular day in the term of this Court, came to be heard the Court’s Motion to Dismiss the above-styled and numbered case for lack of prosecution. It is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: _____ 1. The Court’s Motion to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution is reset for hearing on __________________________, 2019, at 8:30 AM. x _____ 2. No party seeking affirmative relief to said suit appeared, and the Court, having considered the facts surrounding same, finds that this cause of action should be dismissed for lack of prosecution; therefore it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above- styled and numbered cause is dismissed, and same is hereby removed for the docket of this Court. Signed this on this the 23rd day of August, 2019 ________________________________ Judge Presiding Minute 27th of August, 2019